In a stunning turn of events not seen here since the UBB days, a local forum conservative raises a point not immediately refuted by fact.
Forum enthusiast Jophiel commented, “I can’t believe I’m actually having a discussion on this forum which hasn’t yet devolved into name calling and disputes involving bizarre re-definitions of words.â€
“After countless nonsensical posts about who put their feet up on the desk in the oval office or who bowed to which leader we actually have a legitimate discussion in which neither side seems clearly at leave of their senses†added forum maven Nexa.
“Smashing. Now we can get back to talking about fast cars and boobies.†– Nobby
“Later†– Nepthys
“Wombats. Wombats in MiG fighters. And a new house.†– Kaolin
“Is it Friday? Or just a miracle? Yay!†– Tare
“Awe hell with it…ruining our good name. I’ll just go chop some wood, smoke, bench press…and all will be good.†– varrus
“Was that a…rabbit?†– Flea
“Well pick me out a $39 toaster! I never thought I’d see the day†– Jonwin
“I think lots of people simply don't recognize the importance of words themselves; if you don't have the word, then you don't have the concept to which it refers†– Pensive
“Yes, but he’s still wrong†- Smash
“Damnit Smash, don’t ruin it. We’ve got to encourage this.†– Tricky
“It does not remove your freedom to sue. It does not remove your right to be compensated for your damages. Tort reform only limits the punative damages which may be applied. You don't have a right to get a boat load of money because a judge decided that the doctor who harmed you works for a larger organization which can afford to be made an example of. “ – gbaji
so it goes.