ThiefX wrote:
Quote:
You do realize that many of these "Dixiecrats" who fought integration bolted to the Republican party in the late sixties and early 70's, right?
And you do realize Dixiecrats was more of a 3rd party that disolved more than a decade before the Civil Rights struggles of the 60's?
And yes some of thier members did become Republicans (for varied reason, mostly due to state rights issues) and a lot of thier members remained life long Democrats.
But you knew all this though right? Of course you did...........
You understand that words in quotes do not precicely mean what they usually mean, right?
Let me help you, you confused little boy.
In the 1930s, after the New Deal under Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a realignment occurred. Much of the Democratic Party shifted towards economic intervention and support for civil rights and liberties. After the crises of the Great Depression, World War II, and the beginning of the Cold War, Southern Democrats began to drift from the mainstream of the party. The formation of the Dixiecrat movement heralded an end to the New Deal coalition. For more than a century, white Southerners had overwhelmingly been Democrats, but in 1948 many bolted from the party,
angered by Harry Truman's efforts to abolish or ameliorate the effects of racial segregation, and supported Strom Thurmond's third-party candidacy for president.
In 1968, Alabama's Democratic former governor George C. Wallace ran for President on the American Independent Party ticket, and swept the electoral votes of the Deep South. The American Independent Party failed to keep its foothold in the South. Its 1972 candidate was John G. Schmitz, a John Bircher from California, whose strongest showing in the 1972 election was 10% in Idaho, but who did poorly in the South.
Subsequent southern Dixiecrats running on the American Independent Party ticket included Lester Maddox and John Rarick, but these campaigns did not succeed either.
TheifX wrote:
And yes some of thier members did become Republicans (for varied reason, mostly due to state rights issues) and a lot of thier members remained life long Democrats.
Is continuing to suppress an entire race a "states' rights" issue?