Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Paedophile to be beheaded and crucifiedFollow

#202 Nov 04 2009 at 5:42 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Well you're reading them enough to form an opinion about them,


No, you don't understand, I have to read the first line which is why I replied fully to that 1 line post you wrote. Beyond that I have no clue what you write. If it's about kittens, then PM me else I'm not interested. Especially after I read what BT said about you.
____________________________
.
#203 Nov 04 2009 at 5:44 PM Rating: Good
It's just like I said, his life story is a litany of failures punctuated by mistakes. And, we can only hope, a full stop.
#204 Nov 04 2009 at 5:50 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
jtftaru wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
So, in this post you have called me (and others who post here) "scumbag filth," and compared me (and others who post here) to compounded fecal matter. You then made assumptions on how I behave.

Care to show me where I insulted you at all before you levered those attacks on me?

Edited, Nov 4th 2009 5:02pm by Belkira


You misunderstand. I didn't mean you personally I meant you collectively. I did use the word collectively in a previous post.

You must be aware of the reputation the Asylum and its posters have? And the OOT to a certain extent? I can't believe you are unaware of it.

If you truly are, you can always click on the many links in this forum to see all the threads, (most of which don't involve me) where all people do is attack and insult each other.

Jophiel made reference to it earlier.


I understand the reputation, as well as the use of a collective "you."

Surely you understand, however, that using the collective "you" includes me, considering I post in the OOT and, to a lesser extent, the Asylum. Therefore, you were attacking me, when it was not warranted.

That's the problem with generalizations.

My point, though, is that you've really just demostrated that you are just as bad as those that you are judging.


Er no. I've read plenty of your personal posts in the OOT and here that justify your reputation. Just not in this particular thread. You're no angel. So the generalisation does actually apply to you.

I haven't demonstrated anything other than pointing out to ********* how they have behaved.

Go back through the thread. You'll see I am respectful to people who actually contribute with relevance to the thread, even if their opinions differ from mine - like your friend Annabelle.

So no, you have no point to make.
____________________________
.
#205 Nov 04 2009 at 5:51 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,359 posts
jtftaru wrote:
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Well you're reading them enough to form an opinion about them,


No, you don't understand, I have to read the first line which is why I replied fully to that 1 line post you wrote. Beyond that I have no clue what you write. If it's about kittens, then PM me else I'm not interested. Especially after I read what BT said about you.


Well I can't dock you points for consistent willful ignorance: people, law, ethics, and yourself. You're so willfully ignorant that you're willfully for the concept of willful ignorance. That's like metawill or something, jesus.
#206 Nov 04 2009 at 5:52 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
<-- finds this thread and the troll who started it to be mind-numbingly tedious.
#207 Nov 04 2009 at 5:55 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
Samira wrote:
Quote:
You must be aware of the reputation the Asylum and its posters have? And the OOT to a certain extent? I can't believe you are unaware of it.


And what possible difference does it make if we have a "reputation" beyond this forum? Who gives a ripe one, exactly?


No one. I'm just pointing out that it isn't just me who points out how you guys behave.

Samira wrote:
Quote:
People get treated according to how they behave. That's kind of the theme of the thread. I appreciate you live in a fantasy world but in the real world you don't get to be rude and obnoxious to people without them pointing out how you behave. It doesn't reflect badly on them for pointing out how you behave, but on you for behaving like that.


Same pattern. You're failing hard, here, bud.



There is no 'pattern' and there's nothing to fail at. You are who you are, whether I point it out or not.

If you want to have a civilised discussion, like some people in this thread have, then that's what you'll get (from me anyway). If you want to act like a ****, attack people for no reason, not even respond to the thread properly and generally act like an Asylum prick then don't complain if you're treated accordingly.
____________________________
.
#208 Nov 04 2009 at 5:59 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
drivel


I'm sure there is someone somewhere who is reading your posts.

Ambrya wrote:
<-- finds this thread and the troll who started it to be mind-numbingly tedious.


The only trolls are those such as yourself who can't contribute usefully to a thread.
____________________________
.
#209 Nov 04 2009 at 6:03 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
We can only hope jtftaru gets stuck on the wrong end of some anecdotal evidence linking him to a local murder, and he gets put up in front of such a quick and easy "Execute the evil doers" type system, and begs for his life and innocence.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#210 Nov 04 2009 at 6:03 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Ambrya wrote:
<-- finds this thread and the troll who started it to be mind-numbingly tedious.


Nah, I like him more than Varus. This guy actually thinks everyone else is out to get him. It's cute. Unique, even.
#211 Nov 04 2009 at 6:05 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
TirithRR the Eccentric wrote:
We can only hope jtftaru gets stuck on the wrong end of some anecdotal evidence linking him to a local murder, and he gets put up in front of such a quick and easy "Execute the evil doers" type system, and begs for his life and innocence.


That's precisely what I was talking about earlier. I made it clear several times that the death penality would not be just for something like anecdotal evidence but as proven again, people don't bother replying to what is said but to what they want to see.
____________________________
.
#212 Nov 04 2009 at 6:08 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
<-- finds this thread and the troll who started it to be mind-numbingly tedious.


Nah, I like him more than Varus. This guy actually thinks everyone else is out to get him. It's cute. Unique, even.


Again with the nonsense. How many times have I said you guys have a reputation for acting like this and it's not just with me? I had to spell it out specifically for Belkira. It's pretty much the same in every thread, hence your reputation.
____________________________
.
#213 Nov 04 2009 at 6:12 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
<-- finds this thread and the troll who started it to be mind-numbingly tedious.


Nah, I like him more than Varus. This guy actually thinks everyone else is out to get him. It's cute. Unique, even.


I think he's actually showing more of a persecution complex than tailmon does.
#214 Nov 04 2009 at 6:18 PM Rating: Decent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
Quote:
There is no fantasy land argument. I pointed out that child rapists or murderers are deserving of capital punishment and most people agreed. If you and your kind are incapable of having a decent conversation without acting like textbook message board losers that doesn't affect me.


And everyone pointed out that it would highly inefficient to perform capital punishment on everyone, among other things. And you responded by saying that they were ignoring your point and eventually started trolling, either inadvertantly or on purpose. Your argument is a fantasy land argument because what you suggest would never work in reality. This has been pointed out multiple times and you have yet to address it, just pretending that it doesn't matter or that it's irrelevant.

Quote:
As opposed to most of the others on here who simply attack and insult anyone who doesn't agree with what they say.
Which is, once again, what you're doing. You'll find that we're actually pretty civil when dealing with someone who can hold an intelligent conversation and present logical arguments. It's when we're dealing with people who refuse to see reailty and don't understand anything (ie: idiots) that everyone goes down to your level and throws insults while they're at it because you're not going to understand their argument anyway. Actually, you're not going to find out that we're civil because you're never going to take part in the fomor type of argument.

Quote:
You haven't agreed to anything. You weren't involved. And what would you know about reality anyway?


It doesn't take much effort to read the thread. A once over and any decent rational person will see that you've been ignoring everybody and just screaming "LALALALALALALALALALA". What would I know about reality? I can't place myself at any certain point of perspective because I don't have many things to compare myself too, but I can definitely say I know more than you. Almost all of my serious arguments have had a basis in reality and actually were applicable or made sense. And when I found out that some parts may be incorrect or flat out wrong, I realized it and changed my perspective slightly. Something you seem to be unable to do, on both accounts.

Quote:
People get treated according to how they behave. That's kind of the theme of the thread.


And you're suprised that we've been treating you like a 13 year old who thinks he's a big boy? And you try to call us out of it? Smiley: lol

Quote:
If you go back and read the thread you'll see that the people who actually addressed the point or posted relevantly in the thread were treated accordingly. Feel free to try it one day.


No, you'll see that some people were treated appropriately, and that some were incorrectly deemed "irrelevant" or "drivel" and then discarded as if they were the ramblings of a hobo wearing his own **** to keep warm. The amount of reading comprehension that you lack is absolutely astounding. I dare say you may even be able to compete with Alma.
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#215 Nov 04 2009 at 6:20 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
I think he's actually showing more of a persecution complex than tailmon does.


Ah, the old 1 liner trick again...

I've already pointed out you behave this way with everyone not just me.

It's funny, I was thinking the same thing about you and your continual nonsense posts even though I haven't read 90% of them. You certainly have some sort of complex...
____________________________
.
#216 Nov 04 2009 at 6:24 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
jtftaru wrote:
I was thinking the same thing about you and your continual nonsense posts even though I haven't read 90% of them.

Pretty clearly false.

#217 Nov 04 2009 at 6:26 PM Rating: Decent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
trickybeck wrote:
jtftaru wrote:
I was thinking the same thing about you and your continual nonsense posts even though I haven't read 90% of them.

Pretty clearly false.



Pensive's posts are usually nothing but pure logic without a single trace of emotion. It's no surprise he wouldn't be able to follow anything he says.
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#218 Nov 04 2009 at 6:26 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
<-- finds this thread and the troll who started it to be mind-numbingly tedious.


Nah, I like him more than Varus. This guy actually thinks everyone else is out to get him. It's cute. Unique, even.


I think he's actually showing more of a persecution complex than tailmon does.


Freaking hell, you're right. Ok, still cute, not unique. Good try, Taru :-(

Quote:
You certainly have some sort of complex...


An Edifice Complex. Tall buildings just do it for me.
#219 Nov 04 2009 at 6:31 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
The One and Only Deadgye wrote:
drivel


Didn't read any of that nonsense.

I remember you from last time - you're just another self-deluding ignorant web stereotype who can't bear the fact people don't agree with whatever stupid thing you want to believe is true.

You have no grasp of reality and no ability to even respond logically to anything anyone says. The previous comment about cat memes was a valid one.

You really need to stop and realise how ridiculous people like you look trying to foist your mental problems onto other people.

If you can't even respond to what people are saying, or just resort to throwing hysterical insults when they don't agree with you, no one will take you seriously.

You're as ridiculous as Pensive and I have no intention of reading your posts any more than his...
____________________________
.
#220 Nov 04 2009 at 6:31 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
The One and Only Deadgye wrote:
Pensive's posts are usually nothing but pure logic without a single trace of emotion. It's no surprise he wouldn't be able to follow anything he says.

I don't know whether he's following them or not, but his claim to not reading 90% of them is dubious.

#221 Nov 04 2009 at 6:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,359 posts
jtftaru wrote:
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
I think he's actually showing more of a persecution complex than tailmon does.


Ah, the old 1 liner trick again...


I wasn't talking to you, *****. I chose to respect your willful ignorance and not respond to you. For some reason you just can't get enough of my presence that you wanted to reply anyway.
#222 Nov 04 2009 at 6:33 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
trickybeck wrote:
jtftaru wrote:
I was thinking the same thing about you and your continual nonsense posts even though I haven't read 90% of them.

Pretty clearly false.



Certainly not false. Makes no difference either way. From the posts I read at the start and the first lines of his later ones, he just says the same thing over and over.
____________________________
.
#223 Nov 04 2009 at 6:35 PM Rating: Good
****
4,512 posts
jtftaru, you're trying a little too hard.
#224 Nov 04 2009 at 6:36 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
The One and Only Deadgye wrote:
trickybeck wrote:
jtftaru wrote:
I was thinking the same thing about you and your continual nonsense posts even though I haven't read 90% of them.

Pretty clearly false.



Pensive's posts are usually nothing but pure logic without a single trace of emotion. It's no surprise he wouldn't be able to follow anything he says.


I read this post it was so short and it's the stupidest thing I've ever heard you say. The few posts I read of Pensive's were chock full of nothing but puerile emotional insults, totally devoid of any logic or reasoning.
____________________________
.
#225 Nov 04 2009 at 6:38 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
<-- finds this thread and the troll who started it to be mind-numbingly tedious.


Nah, I like him more than Varus. This guy actually thinks everyone else is out to get him. It's cute. Unique, even.


I think he's actually showing more of a persecution complex than tailmon does.


Freaking hell, you're right. Ok, still cute, not unique. Good try, Taru :-(

Quote:
You certainly have some sort of complex...


An Edifice Complex. Tall buildings just do it for me.


Your keyboard warrior sound-bites sound really naff. You need to get some new ones.

And that comment wasn't in response to you. Once again you can't even get the hang of responding properly...
____________________________
.
#226 Nov 04 2009 at 6:39 PM Rating: Decent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
jtftaru wrote:
The One and Only Deadgye wrote:
drivel


Didn't read any of that nonsense.

I remember you from last time - you're just another self-deluding ignorant web stereotype who can't bear the fact people don't agree with whatever stupid thing you want to believe is true.

You have no grasp of reality and no ability to even respond logically to anything anyone says. The previous comment about cat memes was a valid one.

You really need to stop and realise how ridiculous people like you look trying to foist your mental problems onto other people.

If you can't even respond to what people are saying, or just resort to throwing hysterical insults when they don't agree with you, no one will take you seriously.

You're as ridiculous as Pensive and I have no intention of reading your posts any more than his...


I love how you can deem what I said nonsense when you admit to not even reading it. I have to resort to cat memes? I've had the ability to post images for less than a year. Tell me, buddy, how exactly did I manage to post cat memes in all my arguments the previous 5 years?

The thing I laughed about the most was when you told me what I had a grasp of. You've read some of my posts on an internet forum, and outright refuse to read others, and you think you know me? Smiley: lol
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 239 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (239)