Paedophile to be beheaded and crucifiedFollow

Look, jtfartu - if that is your real name - you're a fuckwit. The sad thing is that you're too short-sighted to realise this. Let's look at the facts here, OK? You're arguing with Red, a guy so smart he left France despite seventeen years of indoctrination. Do you really think you can best him, when your life story is a litany of miserable failures? Your inability to have an intellectual debate would be disturbing, if it weren't obvious that your mind is no loss to the world. Now, I'm sure you might impress your chip-grease-slick peers with your pathetic attempt to obfuscate the disconnect between what you are advocating and reality, but I'm afraid that those of us devoid of crippling mental problems are unimpressed. If I were to commit to words every insult that describes you, the tag cloud would block out the sun, and you could be an idiot in the shade. If I were a more nationalistic man, I would shove you in the nearest cannon and fire you across the channel, though you're probably too dense to travel outside British waters anyway.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that you're a complete imbecile and you're fooling nobody. I suggest you put yourself out of our misery and kill yourself.

Edited, Nov 4th 2009 3:57pm by Kavekk

I appreciate that you guys here in the Asylum have your reputation as moronic sub-human animals for a reason but I am patient and willing to teach you.

In the end we're all talking back to voices in our heads. Everything gets filtered through our perceptions and skewed by our biases.

/shrug

Well now THERE you go. You actually addressed my point. And it only took 15 posts, 73 insults, a small circle jerk and probably the divine intervention of some omnipotent deity.

Was that so hard? I mean, here we are now having a nice conversation. Isn't this nice?

Ok, back to the point. I don't agree that you can never get 100% proof. For a start, you can have an admission. Even without an admission, a room full of eye-witnesses together with CCTV footage for example is usually enough. Then when he's shown the footage, he will usually confess.

I get the point that you think if it's not 100% then the death penalty shouldn't apply but you are wrong to think there are no situations where 100% proof is attainable.

Also, let's say hypothetically that we DID get 100% proof. Do you then consider the death penalty appropriate? I get the impression that certain people here, even if they had 100% proof would still fight to have a baby rapist or murderer kept alive. I think this is morally wrong, not to mention a drain on the tax payer.

I do think that some crimes are bad enough to warrant the death penalty.

Crucifixion in a Muslim country. You'd think they'd have their own religion-based position of execution instead of stealing from someone else.

Seriously? This may be the dumbest thing you've said today.

I think you should go back and research crucifixion a little more.

You might actually be the most self-deluded person I've met.

Let me play with you then, and address your actual "point."

drivel