Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Eat My MeatFollow

#52 Nov 02 2009 at 12:41 PM Rating: Good
***
3,959 posts
My hovercraft is full of Soylent Eels.

Joph, from which population would you clone?
#53 Nov 02 2009 at 12:53 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,369 posts
Lucinus wrote:
My hovercraft is full of Soylent Eels.

Joph, from which population would you clone?


The heirs to the Donner estate.
#54 Nov 02 2009 at 7:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
MDenham wrote:
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
uncanny valley mother@#%^er, do you know it?
Excuse me, where did he bring up computer graphics of people?

Edited, Oct 30th 2009 4:51pm by MDenham


A brainless, but living, human body is too human to distance myself enough to use a sex toy. It's also not human enough to have sex with it, as a fellow subject. Kay?


Didn't stop Paris Hilton getting her own TV show.
#55 Nov 02 2009 at 9:06 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
You have no idea how much angel meat could fetch on the open market.


Sure. But you also don't know how much angel meat can fit on the head of a pin, do you?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#56 Nov 02 2009 at 11:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
gbaji wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
You have no idea how much angel meat could fetch on the open market.


Sure. But you also don't know how much angel meat can fit on the head of a pin, do you?


A maximum number of 8.6766*10exp49 angels at the critical angel mass (3.8807*10exp-34 kg).

This is only upper bounds, and do not take into account the effects of a finite number of available angels, degeneracy pressures if angels obey the Pauli exclusion principle as suggested by Aquinas, or the theo-psychology of the angels themselves which may prohibit them from invading each others personal space.

Note that this only holds if the angels are dancing, if they are not, far less angels can fit on the head of a pin.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#57 Nov 03 2009 at 7:42 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
I would have thought if they weren't dancing, and were still, you could pack them in more tightly (like a crystaline lattice, like scales, or even more appositely, like an Escher drawing, and thus fit on more of them.

Screenshot


Edited, Nov 3rd 2009 8:53am by Aripyanfar
#58 Nov 03 2009 at 10:37 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
I would have thought if they weren't dancing, and were still, you could pack them in more tightly (like a crystaline lattice, like scales, or even more appositely, like an Escher drawing, and thus fit on more of them.


Naww, if they are moving it will condense their specific quantitative properties and therefore allow more to be touching the pin at a time.

If stationary you can only pack 1050 or so atop the same area rather than the ~86 Quindecillion that will fit while in motion..
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#59 Nov 03 2009 at 11:10 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Take your hands off me, you damn dirty apes!
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 232 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (232)