Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Okay, wtf is going on?Follow

#77 Nov 03 2009 at 9:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Honestly? I don't remember where I heard that number. Happy?

Not as happy as I'd be to get an actual cite since you seem intent on using it to make your points.
Quote:
Does it really matter? As you just stated yourself, I used the $2k figure before (about a month ago I believe).

Of course it matters -- do you think you count as your own cite these days? Why should we use it or accept it as a point if we don't know if it came from the CBO or the Heritage Foundation or United Healthcare or out of a fortune cookie? Hey, Gbaji! I heard that the healthcare bill will save everyone $50,000 a year! Does it matter where I heard it?

Your best guess is that this is a number the insurance companies came up with. Well, golly, I can't think of anything that could be fishy with the insurance companies telling us that health care reform will be terrible for the consumers.
Quote:
So regardless where I heard it or saw it, it matches the increase she's seeing, doesn't it?

A woman in Ohio picks up a hot pan with her bare hands. In Phoenix, her sister feels a sharp pain. Proof positive that psychic connections are real!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#78 Nov 04 2009 at 6:30 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
Does it really matter? As you just stated yourself, I used the $2k figure before (about a month ago I believe).

Of course it matters -- do you think you count as your own cite these days? Why should we use it or accept it as a point if we don't know if it came from the CBO or the Heritage Foundation or United Healthcare or out of a fortune cookie? Hey, Gbaji! I heard that the healthcare bill will save everyone $50,000 a year! Does it matter where I heard it?


If it actually does save everyone $50,000 a year, then no, it really doesn't. You were correct about the amount that would be saved. Where you heard the number isn't really that important.

You see where I'm going with this, right? Let's pretend for the moment that I just made up a number out of thin air. I make this wild and crazy claim that health care costs will go up by $2000/year. Then, a few months later, someone comments that they just received a notice from their insurance company saying that their health care costs will go up by $2000/year.

What does that mean? It means that my made up number was right. Shocking!

How many times have I made the argument that the source of something is less important than the truth of that something? I seem to recall making a point about how if a drunk in a gutter says "Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you", it's just as valid and "true" a statement as if the Son of God comes down from heaven and says the same thing. Far too many people get caught up on who says something, and where they got their information and far too few people look at the information itself. I see it all the time.


Um... And wouldn't the insurance companies be the best source to find out how much they're going to raise rates as a result of current health care reform? You know. If we are going to look at the source...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#79 Nov 04 2009 at 6:33 PM Rating: Good
****
4,512 posts
gbaji wrote:
I seem to recall making a point about how if a drunk in a gutter says "Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you", it's just as valid and "true" a statement as if the Son of God comes down from heaven and says the same thing. Far too many people get caught up on who says something, and where they got their information and far too few people look at the information itself. I see it all the time.


Philosophical statements are vastly different from referencing facts in support of your argument. Not that it's a surprise you're trying to claim they're similar or anything.
#80 Nov 04 2009 at 6:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
You see where I'm going with this, right?

Yeah. You're frantically trying to cover your *** for throwing out shit numbers, without sources and then lamely admitting that you think you maybe kinda sorta heard them on the radio maybe from an insurance company.
Quote:
What does that mean? It means that my made up number was right.

Except that your claim is that the legislation would raise everyone's insurance whereas the person in question stated that their insurance was raising its rates regardless of whether the legislation passed or not. The legislation, which hasn't even gone to the first round of voting yet had mysteriously made the insurance companies raise their rates? Really? I mean... wow! That's like... magic! And I bet the companies will lower their rates $2,000 if te legislation dies, right? Right? Huh? Because it's all because of the legislation, right? You.. heard it on the radio and stuff?

I realize that, as per usual, you were caught making shit up to match what you really deeply want to believe but you can't see the problem with that? Really?

Smiley: laugh Good lord.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#81 Nov 05 2009 at 7:33 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
Um... And wouldn't the insurance companies be the best source to find out how much they're going to raise rates as a result of current health care reform? You know. If we are going to look at the source...


That or independent economic analysts who have yet to have been paid off by aforementioned insurance company. But Unicorns are hard to find.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#82 Nov 05 2009 at 7:47 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Jophiel wrote:

Except that your claim is that the legislation would raise everyone's insurance whereas the person in question stated that their insurance was raising its rates regardless of whether the legislation passed or not. The legislation, which hasn't even gone to the first round of voting yet had mysteriously made the insurance companies raise their rates? Really? I mean... wow! That's like... magic! And I bet the companies will lower their rates $2,000 if te legislation dies, right? Right? Huh? Because it's all because of the legislation, right? You.. heard it on the radio and stuff?


This is exactly the first thing I thought when Gbaji said the increase next year was due to pending legislation. No, it's not. It's an effort to squeeze money out of their customers while using the legislation as an excuse. There's no chance that they will take lower an increase of that amount. As said, premiums have just kept on rising. The correct answer would have been "the economy went down, but the insurance companies know there isn't an alternative so they can charge more money."

I don't like that premiums go up, but I understand the private companies are in it for the money, not for their customers. Hence why I want reform with a public option that's actually in it for the citizens.
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 260 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (260)