Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Classy DemocratsFollow

#202REDACTED, Posted: Oct 13 2009 at 2:09 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tricksy,
#203 Oct 13 2009 at 2:11 PM Rating: Good
publiusvarus wrote:
Tricksy,

Quote:
I'm more concerned with the nutritional content.


Translation:

I'm cheap.



One would think that you would be applauding him, since he isn't a burden on the healthcare system with his terrible eating habits.
#204REDACTED, Posted: Oct 13 2009 at 2:15 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tulip,
#205 Oct 13 2009 at 2:22 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Tulip,

Sorry honey people that eat cheap and don't care about what they put in their body aren't exactly the most healthy people.

He said nutritional not cheap. You said cheap.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#206 Oct 13 2009 at 2:24 PM Rating: Good

publiusvarus wrote:
Tricksy,

Quote:
I'm more concerned with the nutritional content.


Translation:

I'm cheap.



publiusvarus wrote:
Tulip,

Sorry honey people that eat cheap and don't care about what they put in their body aren't exactly the most healthy people.



See Highlighted and Underlined. Actually, the cheap stuff is the food with the Trans-fats and the high sodium. It’s been proven (and I'm sure I can find the quote if need be) that low income people (or the ones that buy cheap food) are the ones with weight issues.

If someone is concerned with Nutritional information they are most likely looking for things that are good for them, Fresh fruits and vegetables that are more expensive.


http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/12/29/obesity_battle_starts_young_for_urban_poor/

Quote:
Low-income parents often tell Boston Medical Center doctors that fresh fruits and vegetables either aren't accessible in the inner city or cost too much, Lenders said. "And a second issue is the safety in their area," which sometimes limits children's physical activity, she said. "A lot of parents don't feel their kids are safe on the streets, so they keep them in the house, and the best baby sitter in the house is the TV."


Edited, Oct 13th 2009 4:29pm by toohotforu
#207 Oct 13 2009 at 2:26 PM Rating: Good
publiusvarus wrote:
Tulip,

Sorry honey people that eat cheap and don't care about what they put in their body aren't exactly the most healthy people.



Your reading comprehension is failing you, once again. I guess it goes back to that Christian college that taught you to misinterpret whatever you read to fit your own agenda.

Quote:
I'm more concerned with the nutritional content.
#208REDACTED, Posted: Oct 13 2009 at 2:28 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tooty,
#209REDACTED, Posted: Oct 13 2009 at 2:29 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tulip,
#210 Oct 13 2009 at 2:32 PM Rating: Good
publiusvarus wrote:
Tooty,

Quote:
If someone is concerned with Nutritional information they are most likely looking for things that are good for them, Fresh fruits and vegetables that are more expensive.


/nod


So, to sum this up.

Your comment about being cheap because they are more concerned with Nutritional information is bogus.
#211 Oct 13 2009 at 2:38 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Tricksy,

Quote:
I'm more concerned with the nutritional content.


Translation:

I'm cheap.


Screenshot
#212 Oct 13 2009 at 2:39 PM Rating: Default
Tooty,

Quote:
Your comment about being cheap because they are more concerned with Nutritional information is bogus.


I said;

Quote:
Sorry honey people that eat cheap and don't care about what they put in their body aren't exactly the most healthy people.


I think you're missing something. I guess I should have spelled out that eating cheap generally means you're eating poor quality food.



#213 Oct 13 2009 at 2:42 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Quote:
I think you're missing something. I guess I should have spelled out that eating cheap generally means you're eating poor quality food.
You said that the translation of I'm more concerned with the nutritional content is I'm cheap

I take it you're retracting that statement?
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#214 Oct 13 2009 at 2:46 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Poor quality food is generally mass produced by large corporations whose interests lie entirely in the profit they can make with no regard whatsoever as to the nutritional content of the food, the health of the consumer, or the damage done to the environment during its production.

I'm guessing that the vast majority of these corporations are run by capitalists.

Socialist food FTW.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#215 Oct 13 2009 at 3:04 PM Rating: Good
publiusvarus wrote:
Tooty,

Quote:
Your comment about being cheap because they are more concerned with Nutritional information is bogus.


I said;

Quote:
Sorry honey people that eat cheap and don't care about what they put in their body aren't exactly the most healthy people.


I think you're missing something. I guess I should have spelled out that eating cheap generally means you're eating poor quality food.


It's pretty sad when you can't even figure out your own posts. Smiley: frown
#216REDACTED, Posted: Oct 13 2009 at 3:52 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Xarus,
#217 Oct 13 2009 at 3:53 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
it might have a chance if you ignore the fact that he said he does care about nutritional content. Also not being picky and eating crap are very different.

Edited, Oct 13th 2009 4:54pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#218 Oct 13 2009 at 3:53 PM Rating: Good
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Does that make sense?


Not really, no.

People who are picky eaters are typically obsessive about flavor and texture, not nutritional content. People who are not picky are free to concentrate on quality, regardless of flavor and texture.



Edited, Oct 13th 2009 2:54pm by Samira
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#219 Oct 13 2009 at 3:54 PM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Xarus,

I was responding to Trickys,

Quote:
But I'm not very picky, and there's no way I'd spend $150 on a dinner for two. I don't experience anything more than a brief, superficial pleasure from food. I'm more concerned with the nutritional content.


And like I said, generally speaking, people who aren't picky with what they eat tend not to care about the nutritional content.

Does that make sense?


"more concerned with the nutritional content" should be a big giveaway, at least in tricky's case.
#220 Oct 13 2009 at 4:35 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Xarus,

I was responding to Trickys,

Quote:
But I'm not very picky, and there's no way I'd spend $150 on a dinner for two. I don't experience anything more than a brief, superficial pleasure from food. I'm more concerned with the nutritional content.


And like I said, generally speaking, people who aren't picky with what they eat tend not to care about the nutritional content.

Does that make sense?
It's probably closer to "I'm fine with eating broccoli, even if it's not slathered in butter."

Is it that difficult to separate luxury items and healthy food? The two are almost mutually exclusive.

Edited, Oct 13th 2009 5:36pm by Sweetums
#221 Oct 13 2009 at 5:46 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Sweetums wrote:
It's probably closer to "I'm fine with eating broccoli, even if it's not slathered in butter."

Is it that difficult to separate luxury items and healthy food? The two are almost mutually exclusive.

Mhmm.

When I say "not picky," I mean that I'm not bothered if something is bland, unsweetened, unseasoned, bitter, or mushy. Which many healthy foods happen to be.

Completely unseasoned, boiled broccoli, as noted above, being one of those things. (I tried raw broccoli in my lunch for a while, but it gave me indigestion.)


As an addendum, I AM also cheap. Well, more frugal than cheap. You can't really said to be cheap when your yearly wage is about $28,000. (The preceding will be the only line that varus will respond to, in order to mock). Fortunately, many healthy foods correspond with low price. For example, a cup of rice, a can of black or kidney beans, and some frozen broccoli, all thrown in a rice cooker. This is more nutritious than a hamburger, and costs about $1.35.



Edited, Oct 13th 2009 6:46pm by trickybeck
#222 Oct 13 2009 at 8:19 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
Quote:
Completely unseasoned, boiled broccoli, as noted above, being one of those things. (I tried raw broccoli in my lunch for a while, but it gave me indigestion.)
If you are boiling the broccoli and especially if it is mushy, there is very little nutrition left in it.

You should steam the broccoli until it is firm but just tender, and add some salt and pepper will make it taste better, and it is better for you. Also, Olive oil has tons of essential fatty acids that you need, and so a little bit is great. Much better then tasteless, nutritionally empty mushy broccoli. Most vegetables should be steamed, although grilling is another great option. Toss with a very small amount of olive oil and salt and pepper and toss on the bbq for a little while.

Quote:
When I say "not picky," I mean that I'm not bothered if something is bland, unsweetened, unseasoned, bitter, or mushy. Which many healthy foods happen to be.
This is completely untrue.

Edited, Oct 13th 2009 9:20pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#223 Oct 13 2009 at 8:48 PM Rating: Good
***
3,909 posts
We need a new troll. Varus is boring.

I volunteer Kavekk.
#224 Oct 13 2009 at 9:07 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
Good nutritional food doesn't need to be costly, but it takes preparation time I am no longer able to spend. Add food allergies and shopping for food I can eat is becoming a nightmare as I learn how many foods have bi-sulfite's and dairy products in them.

I'm in process of creating a list of foods I can and can't have, for Jonwin to use when shopping. He does most of the cooking around here and he wasn't raised on expensive foods and have to deal with my mom's taste for good cooking. My dad learn fast how to cook, when she got too ill to do it herself.

I also have been asked to provide a list for the center were I go 2 times a week. They provide breakfasts and lunches for the clients. Often I can barely eat anything but the vegetables and fruit that is over cooked or in syrup, due to how much salt, fat and sugar there is in the food they cook. At least they finally stop pushing milk at me, though they are require to serve it to everyone.

f only Whole foods and Wegmans would take food stamps, but poor folks aren't suppose to care for what they eat it seems. Now I just need to learn how to make vegan dishes and add meat and eggs sparingly.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#225 Oct 13 2009 at 9:15 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Quote:
Completely unseasoned, boiled broccoli, as noted above, being one of those things. (I tried raw broccoli in my lunch for a while, but it gave me indigestion.)
If you are boiling the broccoli and especially if it is mushy, there is very little nutrition left in it.

No, I didn't mean that the broccoli is mushy. Those adjectives above weren't intended to apply to a specific food.

Besides, boiling too long destroys some nutrients, but boiling briefly doesn't leave it with "very little." Also, there is evidence that, for certain vegetables, cooking breaks down the plant matter or nutrients to a level more easily absorbed by the body.

Quote:
Quote:
When I say "not picky," I mean that I'm not bothered if something is bland, unsweetened, unseasoned, bitter, or mushy. Which many healthy foods happen to be.
This is completely untrue.

That's not an assertion you can even assign truth or untruth to.



Edited, Oct 13th 2009 10:18pm by trickybeck
#226 Oct 13 2009 at 9:17 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
That's not an assertion you can even assign truth or untruth to.


Sure it is. It's just going to be hypothetical truth that you hopefully discharge at some point for whatever thing you need the assertion. Just 'cause we can't verify it empirically doesn't mean we can't play pretend.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 253 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (253)