Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Reply To Thread

Classy DemocratsFollow

QuoteReply
#252 Oct 14 2009 at 9:24 AM Rating: Good
__DEL__1649636418093
View User Forum
Sage
******
30,646 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
They do. He just gets a new IP address through a program. I also think restarting your router if you're on a landline works...
That doesn't change the fact that his last account reached 1600 posts. If they really wanted him gone, they'd keep banning each account as it comes up, but they don't/can't be ***** to, so why bother in the first place?

Because Kao and Varrus are closet commies.


I think a large part of it is that people get bored after a while and ask for him to be unbanned so they have something to point and laugh at.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#253 Oct 14 2009 at 9:34 AM Rating: Good
Elinda
View User Forum
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Why exactly, do admins continue to ban Varrus' accounts, but not IP block him? What's the point of it? Either ban him outright or just give it up.
Did he get banned? I thought he just slipped so far down in rating that even non-filtering doesn't show his posts.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#254 Oct 14 2009 at 9:36 AM Rating: Good
Uglysasquatch
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
I assume he did, because I can still see his posts. Or some of them anyway.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#255 Oct 14 2009 at 10:08 AM Rating: Good
Xsarus
View User Forum
ZAM Administrator
*****
10,601 posts
Elinda wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Why exactly, do admins continue to ban Varrus' accounts, but not IP block him? What's the point of it? Either ban him outright or just give it up.
Did he get banned? I thought he just slipped so far down in rating that even non-filtering doesn't show his posts.
nah, he was still a ways from unrated. There's a stage where his posts pop in and out of view.

Edited, Oct 14th 2009 11:08am by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#256 Oct 14 2009 at 10:56 AM Rating: Default
__DEL__1592317444463
***
2,892 posts
Actually I was out of the office all morning and my laptop logs me directly on with the other name. Believe it or not I don't really care what name I go by here.

You people lead outstandingly boring lifes. This is why you're so obsessed with me.


▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#257 Oct 14 2009 at 10:59 AM Rating: Good
Uglysasquatch
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Actually I was out of the office all morning and my laptop logs me directly on with the other name. Believe it or not I don't really care what name I go by here.

You people lead outstandingly boring lifes. This is why you're so obsessed with me.


I'm so outstanding at my job that I simply always have time to waste, no matter what task I take on. I'm currently fulfilling 3 roles for my company due to this lovely economy and still have time to waste here. I'd be devestated if you weren't here to make me laugh. I'd have to go harrass people on the game forums and try to pull them into =28.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#258 Oct 14 2009 at 11:25 AM Rating: Good
Elinda
View User Forum
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Actually I was out of the office all morning and my laptop logs me directly on with the other name. Believe it or not I don't really care what name I go by here.

You people lead outstandingly boring lifes. This is why you're so obsessed with me.
You had us at 'hello'.

Hey, I see your buddy Rush is crying cuz the NFL team owners won't let him play with them? someone should have warned him that what goes around comes around.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
▲ Page top
#259REDACTED, Posted: Oct 14 2009 at 11:46 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Elinda,
QuoteReply
#260 Oct 14 2009 at 11:53 AM Rating: Good
Elinda
View User Forum
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
Hey, I see your buddy Rush is crying cuz the NFL team owners won't let him play with them? someone should have warned him that what goes around comes around.


It is the St Louis Rams. It's also sad that the media is flat out lying about what Rush has said in the past. Then again that's what liberals do; they lie about people who disagree with them.

And for the record he was right about Mcnabb. Had he been a white quarterback in philly playing the way he has he'd have been fired long ago. TO was 100% right about McNabb.



It's the owners of the other NFL teams that vote on whether he gets to own the Rams or not. There have been multiple negative racial comments, particularly about black athletes, all documented - many right on his own site. Already the ball players are threatening to not play for him.

You, like Rush, can blame it on the media, but clearly it's free market capitalism at work.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
▲ Page top
#261REDACTED, Posted: Oct 14 2009 at 11:56 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Elinda,
QuoteReply
#262 Oct 14 2009 at 11:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Samira
View User Forum
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
No, but they do get a say in whether or not they'll continue working. At least, they do if they have a union.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#263 Oct 14 2009 at 11:59 AM Rating: Good
Elinda
View User Forum
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
You, like Rush, can blame it on the media, but clearly it's free market capitalism at work.


God you're stupid. So according to you in a free market if you have the money to buy something you shouldn't be allowed to based on political preference? Yeah that's freedom. If the owner of the Rams wants to sell and Rush has the money to buy that's all that should matter. Employees generally don't get a say in whether or not the companies ownership changes hands.
The NFL is a franchise organization. Board members do get a say - almost always. You're stupid.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#264 Oct 14 2009 at 12:00 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1649636418093
View User Forum
Sage
******
30,646 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
You, like Rush, can blame it on the media, but clearly it's free market capitalism at work.


God you're stupid. So according to you in a free market if you have the money to buy something you shouldn't be allowed to based on political preference? Yeah that's freedom. If the owner of the Rams wants to sell and Rush has the money to buy that's all that should matter. Employees generally don't get a say in whether or not the companies ownership changes hands.


Let me put it to you this way, Varrus.

If you had the money to buy Whole Foods, and they all could read the things you were writing on here, the franchise owner has the right to refuse to sell it to you based on your character. See, he/she doesn't want their name besmirched by the cloud of ugliness that you present in public. Hypothetically, of course.

And if you were to somehow purchase it, the employees could very, very easily quit and leave you with no one to work for you.

In the long run, it makes more sense for the NFL to refuse the purchase when it could, in effect, ruin their good name and leave St. Louis without a team to call it's own.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#265 Oct 14 2009 at 12:19 PM Rating: Excellent
trickybeck
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
You, like Rush, can blame it on the media, but clearly it's free market capitalism at work.


God you're stupid. So according to you in a free market if you have the money to buy something you shouldn't be allowed to based on political preference? Yeah that's freedom.

This from the guy who won't sell me insurance because I use profanity. Who you crappin'? Smiley: laugh

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#266 Oct 14 2009 at 12:24 PM Rating: Default
__DEL__1592317444463
***
2,892 posts
Tulip,

Quote:
In the long run, it makes more sense for the NFL to refuse the purchase when it could, in effect, ruin their good name and leave St. Louis without a team to call it's own.


You mean like hiring convicted murderers, people who fight dogs, people who kill people while driving drunk. You're delusional if you think Rush could hurt the NFL's image more than Vick or any of the other thugs they give oppurtunity after oppurtunity.


Tricksy,

Quote:
This from the guy who won't sell me insurance because I use profanity. Who you crappin'? Smiley: laugh


Someone cursing at me is quite different than someone who disagrees with my politics. Now if I refused to insure people I knew to be liberal democrats you might have something.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#267 Oct 14 2009 at 12:30 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1649636418093
View User Forum
Sage
******
30,646 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Tulip,

Quote:
In the long run, it makes more sense for the NFL to refuse the purchase when it could, in effect, ruin their good name and leave St. Louis without a team to call it's own.


You mean like hiring convicted murderers, people who fight dogs, people who kill people while driving drunk. You're delusional if you think Rush could hurt the NFL's image more than Vick or any of the other thugs they give oppurtunity after oppurtunity.


I'm not saying you're wrong about that, just that they are in the right to do so. Which you didn't seem to understand.

Edited, Oct 14th 2009 1:31pm by Belkira
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#268 Oct 14 2009 at 12:53 PM Rating: Good
Elinda
View User Forum
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Tulip,

Quote:
In the long run, it makes more sense for the NFL to refuse the purchase when it could, in effect, ruin their good name and leave St. Louis without a team to call it's own.


You mean like hiring convicted murderers, people who fight dogs, people who kill people while driving drunk. You're delusional if you think Rush could hurt the NFL's image more than Vick or any of the other thugs they give oppurtunity after oppurtunity.


What you or I or the bundits think is irrelevant. That's the point. The owners and operators get to decide what they think is best for their organization. Apparently they're pretty skeptical that letting Rush own a share of the NFL would be good for business.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
▲ Page top
#269REDACTED, Posted: Oct 14 2009 at 1:08 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tulip,
QuoteReply
#270 Oct 14 2009 at 1:10 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1649636418093
View User Forum
Sage
******
30,646 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Tulip,

I'm not saying they don't have the right to. What I am saying is that owners saying Rush will hurt the leagues image is BS. I am saying that sports/political pundits are fabricating quotes and attributing them to Rush to kill this. I am saying it seems unamerican to deny someone the oppurtunity to buy something based on their political preference.


Hmm. Ok, then. When you said:

publiusvarus wrote:
If the owner of the Rams wants to sell and Rush has the money to buy that's all that should matter.


You didn't mean that they don't have the right to block Rush's purchase? Color me mistaken. My apologies.

▲ Page top
#271REDACTED, Posted: Oct 14 2009 at 1:15 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tulip,
QuoteReply
#272 Oct 14 2009 at 1:27 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1649636418093
View User Forum
Sage
******
30,646 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Tulip,

Quote:
You didn't mean that they don't have the right to block Rush's purchase?


I meant exactly what I said. If the owner wants to sell and someone wants to buy it there shouldn't be a problem, as long as the money was earned legally.


But... I just explained the problem to you, and you said that the NFL has the right to block the purchase.

So which is it??
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#273 Oct 14 2009 at 1:53 PM Rating: Decent
Driftwood
View User Forum
Scholar
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
And i'll refuse to insure someone and kick them out of my office for swearing. Then again I'm a businessman and you're white trash, go figure.


People aren't white trash just because they curse. Also, you're an insurance salesman, not quite the same thing as a businessman.

publiusvarus wrote:
Tulip,

Quote:
And yes, I believe easily that the profanity is not any more or any less than past administrations. This administration has been in the media and quoted quite a lot. It comes with the territory when you're the first President of the United States of America from a race that is anything other than Caucasian.


Translation:

Quote:
He's black so he can curse all he wants.




Actually, what she was saying is that he curses no mroe or less than the next normal guy, but he's getting more attention from the media because he's the first black president, thus, there are more clips of him and his administration cursing.

Quote:
I'm also guessing you are the type of people who ignore someone at the store who screams at their 5yr old child to shut the f*ck up or they're going to slap the sh*t out of them.


Yes, I am, but that's not because I'm a terrible person, but because it's not my ******* job, to look after other peoples' kids. Besides, they usually are in need of a spanking anyway.

Quote:
Punk,

Posting photo-shopped pictures of W doesn't change anything.



Varus, here is the video that that picture of Bush giving the finger is from. Enjoy!

Quote:
Remind me again how many thousands Saddam murdered this year.


You seem to ignore the fact that his killing of his own people was none of our goddamn business.

Quote:
You know I just do it to upset poor white trash like yourself right?


I love that you think almost everyone here is white trash, as though you only see the name, "Katie" when you see other peoples' posts.

Quote:
If there's one thing I learned in Europe it was to take my time eating. So when I enjoy a good meal I like it to last at least a couple of hours.


As a person who likes to cook food for people to enjoy, rather than just eat, I have to say that I'm glad you at least know how to eat a meal properly.

publiusvarus wrote:
Tricksy,

Quote:
I'm more concerned with the nutritional content.


Translation:

I'm cheap.



Actually, healthy food tends to be fairly expensive.

____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning

Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#274 Oct 15 2009 at 12:41 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1592311634559
Scholar
***
3,909 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
You people lead outstandingly boring lifes. This is why you're so obsessed with me.


I, for one, am far more entertained by examining the insides of a pomegranate than by listening to you.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#275 Oct 15 2009 at 12:55 AM Rating: Good
__DEL__1680481127345
View User Forum
Sage
******
21,262 posts
Varrus is like a bug. I don't think about bugs unless I see them. But when I see them, I squash them.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#276 Oct 15 2009 at 2:09 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1627863823061
Scholar
***
3,229 posts
Your posts are intended to raise a reaction, then you vilify people for that reaction.

Double standards?
▲ Page top
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 249 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (249)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC