Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Olympics 2016Follow

#52 Oct 02 2009 at 9:55 AM Rating: Decent
**
318 posts
Tare wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Keiro wrote:
It was a (poor) attempt at sarcasm.

Then don't post it on the heels of Varus. People'll think you're serious!


Or at least as idiotic as Varus. <angry smiley here>


I didn't think that was possible? Y'know, like being colder than absolute zero.


Guess I'll have to watch my back.

Edited, Oct 2nd 2009 1:55pm by Keiro
#53 Oct 02 2009 at 10:04 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Tare wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Keiro wrote:
It was a (poor) attempt at sarcasm.

Then don't post it on the heels of Varus. People'll think you're serious!


Or at least as idiotic as Varus. <angry smiley here>


Actually I read Keiro's post as an explanation to Kavekk about what Varus meant. So I got the "tone" of sarcasm right away.
#54 Oct 02 2009 at 10:05 AM Rating: Decent
**
318 posts
That's what it was. Haven't posted in a few months so I forgot about the handy quote button.
#55 Oct 02 2009 at 10:10 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Keiro wrote:
That's what it was. Haven't posted in a few months so I forgot about the handy quote button.
This is what happens when smilies are not properly distributed. Even the non-premiums should have a minimum, safety net set of smilies for the Aslyum as a whole to prosper.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#56 Oct 02 2009 at 10:10 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Aripyanfar wrote:
Actually I read Keiro's post as an explanation to Kavekk about what Varus meant. So I got the "tone" of sarcasm right away.

Actually, shutthefuckupyourface&yourmomsface!

So... yeah!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#57 Oct 02 2009 at 10:21 AM Rating: Decent
**
318 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Actually I read Keiro's post as an explanation to Kavekk about what Varus meant. So I got the "tone" of sarcasm right away.

Actually, ***************************************

So... yeah!


I feel that way sometimes. Then I watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFQrs495WWQ

and think about how cool I feel.
#58 Oct 02 2009 at 10:30 AM Rating: Good
**
633 posts
trickybeck wrote:

Ignoring the vapid Obama discussion, I'd rather Chicago not get the Olympics. For one thing, studies tend to show that supposed "economic benefit" is no sure thing - many cities lose money in the long run. And a study from this year showing that Chicago would lose money was dismissed by Mayor Daley because it was conducted by an organization from Michigan.(!!) What a ******.

The other big problem is that, in this corrupt city, any potential economic benefit would be sucked up by crooked politicians, businessmen with their hands in said politicians' pockets, contracts given to friends & family, etc.

The one real lasting benefit I could see coming out of it is if they improve the state of the public trans. More frequent service and more areas of coverage would be super.


I live and own a retail business about 2 minutes from Downtown. I was actually really hoping to see us get it for that very reason. Millions of visitors which means lots of money.

You also get that city wide push to clean up everything that has deteriorated in the last 5 years. You can't even drive down one of my streets because of a sinkhole that has been there since spring. (Kinzie St.)

Its the urban planning that really matters. Do the venues just sit around and do nothing after the games? (*cough* Greece) Or do they continue to stimulate the populace outside of general sporting events.

On the other hand, one thing that bothered me was exactly how the they were going to make room for these venues. I am about to purchase my second sailboat and many of us were very concerned about the rumor that half of the marinas were going to be torn up to make way for new sailing venues. Slip fees were expensive enough in the past ($100 a foot in some places), I am sure that the new fees would reflect the tremendous amount of money required to redo the lakefront.

Washington Park, a community that has some of the lowest Testing scores in the state was going to be torn up in place of some stadium I think.

So yeah, there was a huge question if the return on investment really would bleed out to us hard working Chicagoans that could really use it.

Rio will most definitely benefit from the games. That is an example of the Olympics being able to completely rebuild a city and transform it into world class traveling destination. The common formula that even works with World Cup venues works. Massive development in the city center pushes out the low income and crime ridden areas.
#59REDACTED, Posted: Oct 02 2009 at 10:56 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#60 Oct 02 2009 at 11:04 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I was talking to Keiro with that. Hence the part where I quoted a guy named Keiro before responding. Your response, as in the the one that came under your quoted portion, was just surprise that you were shocked to see Chicago not get it.

I'm not really worried about what Ms. Obama has to say. Foaming hatred for First Lady's is really more of a Republican trait.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#61REDACTED, Posted: Oct 02 2009 at 11:13 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophiel,
#62 Oct 02 2009 at 11:18 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:


And i'm surprised you still can't tell when i'm being sarcastic.
Smiley: dubious
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#63 Oct 02 2009 at 11:22 AM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Jophiel,

Quote:
I'm not really worried about what Ms. Obama has to say. Foaming hatred for First Lady's is really more of a Republican trait.


We learned how to do it from Democrats treatment of W and Palin. Granted we're still not the experts they are.

I'm glad we can all agree that George Bush was really the first lady to **** Cheney.

publiusvarus wrote:

Quote:
was just surprise that you were shocked to see Chicago not get it.


And i'm surprised you still can't tell when i'm being sarcastic.

Sarcasm is for communists and freedom haters.
#64 Oct 02 2009 at 11:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
We learned how to do it from Democrats treatment of W and Palin.

I'm not sure which is worse. The notion that you think George W Bush was First Lady or that you think the GOP's vaginal gush regarding First Lady Hillary Clinton for eight years was because of Palin.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#65 Oct 02 2009 at 11:28 AM Rating: Good
**
318 posts
Quote:
publiusvarus wrote:
Jophiel,

Quote:
I'm not really worried about what Ms. Obama has to say. Foaming hatred for First Lady's is really more of a Republican trait.


We learned how to do it from Democrats treatment of W and Palin. Granted we're still not the experts they are.

I'm glad we can all agree that George Bush was really the first lady to **** Cheney.


Though neither Palin nor Bush were actually elected so I fail to see how either of them classify as first lady.
#66 Oct 02 2009 at 11:38 AM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Keiro wrote:

Though neither Palin nor Bush were actually elected so I fail to see how either of them classify as first lady.

Michelle Obama wasn't elected either.


#67REDACTED, Posted: Oct 02 2009 at 11:39 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#68 Oct 02 2009 at 11:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"Treatment of W" as opposed to "treatment of W's wife" (which was basically nothing, all things considered).

Perhaps before you get on people about reading, you should learn how to write?

Although this does play into your posts earlier in the week where you were demanding that we understand how much of a weak pussy Bush was Smiley: laugh

Edited, Oct 2nd 2009 2:42pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#69REDACTED, Posted: Oct 02 2009 at 11:48 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#70 Oct 02 2009 at 11:52 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Can I get a whoosh?
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#71 Oct 02 2009 at 12:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Tare wrote:
Can I get a whoosh?

WHOOOOSSSHHH!!!!....
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#72 Oct 02 2009 at 12:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
I keep forgetting you read at a 3rd grade level, my bad.

Yeah, but by TN standards, that's a masters degree.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#73REDACTED, Posted: Oct 02 2009 at 1:07 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#74 Oct 02 2009 at 1:07 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Jophed,

Quote:
Yeah, but by TN standards, that's a masters degree.


Yeah well Chicago isn't going to host the Olympics so there.

Neither is anyplace in the US, jackass. So congratulations.
#75 Oct 02 2009 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
Yeah well Chicago isn't going to host the Olympics so there

Yeah, you'll want to save that big gun for someone who gives a shit Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#76 Oct 02 2009 at 2:20 PM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Yeah well Chicago isn't going to host the Olympics so there.

Don't be silly. Obama is obviously going to nuke Rio (and probably Madrid, just to be safe)


Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 714 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (714)