Kavekk wrote:
The USA's every action is sanctioned by the Almighty - thus, is it not appropriate to treat her leader as the manifestation of His will, with all the reverence this implies?
No, it is not "appropriate." Propriety is when we talk about such as using the correct fork, not the ontology of the Lord. It borders on heresy to prescribe that people should revere Obama as the Lord, for to state that it
should be the case implies that there is some logical way that it
might possibly not be the case. It is inconceivable to logic that this particular thing, Obama's infallible divinity, is not the case, as would be a four-sided triangle.
Blasphemous Britons wrote:
Can Obama deliver on nuclear vision?
This however, does not border on heresy, but is a flagrant blasphemy. Ask not whether he can. Ask whether or not you and I have made ourselves deserved of his
will.
Edited, Sep 24th 2009 5:37pm by Pensive
