What Halliburton did was wrong. What Acorn did was worse.
False
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Justice For Jaime Leigh Jones?
Justice For Jaime Leigh Jones? Follow
Quote:
Giving someone advise does not constitute a crime.
Except that it does.
Jophiel wrote:
publiusvarus wrote:
What Halliburton did was wrong.
What should the reaction from the government be?
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
Giving someone advise does not constitute a crime.
Except that it does.
No, it doesn't. If the person acts on that advice, then the person giving advice may be considered an accomplice, but the simple act of giving advice itself does not constitute a crime.
BrownDuck wrote:
What Halliburton did was wrong. What Acorn did was worse.
False
False
Varus is incapable of plainly saying "Halliburton's actions were wrong" and letting it sit without trying to spin it into something about how other people are worse and so Halliburton really isn't so bad.
It's kind of sad. Sad and pathological.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Quote:
No, it doesn't. If the person acts on that advice, then the person giving advice may be considered an accomplice, but the simple act of giving advice itself does not constitute a crime.
Okay, as for that more precise phrasing, I think I'd agree.
publiusvarus wrote:
First off there's been no trial [...] Whatever happened to the presumption of innocence?
Indeed.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
publiusvarus wrote:
Duck,
Feigning outrage is something you're quite accustomed to we know.
First off there's been no trial for Jaime. Whatever happened to the presumption of innocence? Halliburton is taking the risk of being sued either way. There could be nothing to this girls story. She could be lying. She could just be a ****. Don't the accused have any rights?
As for Acorn there's multiple videos proving that they condone child prostitution. But are you people picketing their offices? Are you people screaming in protest? No! All you can manage to do is ignore it and continue talking about Halliburton. Yes I brought up Halliburton in the other thread to illustrate the vast differences in the way the media is covering the two.
Quote:
And you didn't blow a balloon when the duck farted.
Feigning outrage is something you're quite accustomed to we know.
First off there's been no trial for Jaime. Whatever happened to the presumption of innocence? Halliburton is taking the risk of being sued either way. There could be nothing to this girls story. She could be lying. She could just be a ****. Don't the accused have any rights?
As for Acorn there's multiple videos proving that they condone child prostitution. But are you people picketing their offices? Are you people screaming in protest? No! All you can manage to do is ignore it and continue talking about Halliburton. Yes I brought up Halliburton in the other thread to illustrate the vast differences in the way the media is covering the two.
I don't know what's worse, the fact that you completely missed the point of my statement or that you actually responded as if it made sense.
publiusvarus wrote:
And you're content to ignore anything illegal any Democrat is associated with.
Given that I've said multiple times that I'm cool with Acorn being investigated and the cessation of its funding, this would be provably false. Unlike you who can't do more than whine about Acorn.
You never answered my question: What should be the government response to Halliburton's actions?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
publiusvarus wrote:
First off there's been no trial [...] Whatever happened to the presumption of innocence?
Indeed.
Hahaha, I thought the same thing. Apparently bruises all over a woman's body, misplaced and tampered rape kits, and involuntary incarceration leaves room for doubt, but videos do not and mean systemic abuse. Good to know.
publiusvarus wrote:
I don't know. I don't know what part of this girls story is true or not. I havn't heard the defendents.
If the court finds in her favor, what should the response from Congress be?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I think you all seem to have forgotten Varus' misogyny in this whole debate. He doesn't care about one *****'s ruptured **** or implants to another. Hell, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if he's personally been involved in several incidents of sexually abusing women, one way or another. If anything, I can picture him giving high-fives to the men who have gotten away with this so far.
Guenny wrote:
I think you all seem to have forgotten Varus' misogyny in this whole debate. He doesn't care about one *****'s ruptured **** or implants to another. Hell, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if he's personally been involved in several incidents of sexually abusing women, one way or another. If anything, I can picture him giving high-fives to the men who have gotten away with this so far.
The more so since he probably knows some of them. Go go good ol' boys.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Jophed,
Obviously this woman should be compensated for her mental and physical distress and the perps imprisoned.
Quote:
If the court finds in her favor, what should the response from Congress be?
Obviously this woman should be compensated for her mental and physical distress and the perps imprisoned.
publiusvarus wrote:
Obviously this woman should be compensated for her mental and physical distress and the perps imprisoned.
I said the response from Congress. What should Congress's response be?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Quote:
Apparently bruises all over a woman's body, misplaced and tampered rape kits, and involuntary incarceration leaves room for doubt, but videos do not and mean systemic abuse. Good to know.
The marks on her don't count. Only the presence of marks on the rapist can determine whether or not she was willing
publiusvarus wrote:
What do you think?
I think you're dodging the question because you're afraid to answer.
What should Congress's response be?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#49REDACTED,
Posted: Sep 18 2009 at 12:11 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I don't know what the precedence for something like this is. And why should I commit to your question when you havn't seriously committed to mine?
If giving advice were a crime, then anyone who participated in an Advice Dog thread would have to be arrested.
Especially ones that said stuff like, "Hurt people! Kill others!"
Especially ones that said stuff like, "Hurt people! Kill others!"
publiusvarus wrote:
I don't know what the precedence for something like this is.
What do YOU think would be an appropriate response you'd want to see from Congress?
Quote:
And why should I commit to your question
We both know that I have nothing to do with you being afraid to answer.
What should be the response from Congress?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Recent Visitors: 708
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (708)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Justice For Jaime Leigh Jones?
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC