Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Liberals have no shame.Follow

#27 Sep 05 2009 at 11:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
So, I was right. One family's begging of the media is worth substantially less than another family's based on your assessment of that family's value.

That was all I needed to know. Thanks.

Oh, and I personally think that there is much more compelling reasons to post a wartime photo than one of someone not wearing panties but, sadly, we seem to live in a world where the opposite is the case.

Edited, Sep 5th 2009 2:34pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#28 Sep 05 2009 at 11:41 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Oh, and I personally think that there is much more compelling reasons to post a wartime photo than one of someone not wearing panties but, sadly, we seem to live in a world where the opposite is the case.

Edited, Sep 5th 2009 2:34pm by Jophiel


You can't ********** to wartime photos.




(or... shouldn't...)
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#29 Sep 05 2009 at 11:54 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
You can't ********** to wartime photos.


You shouldn't really ********** to blurry and gross accidental nudity either. Maybe if your fetish is specifically exhibitionism or voyeurism, it would make sense (you take what you can get,) but for someone just after an image of the ******, there would be much better options.
#30 Sep 05 2009 at 12:39 PM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,969 posts
ThiefX wrote:
You are equating a celebrity asking a Photographer not print a picture of them puking after drinking too much or a picture of a celeb who "forgot" to wear panties to the parents of a child an adult asking the press not to print a picture of thier son as he lies dying?


Fixed, because last I checked the military does not let people under 10 bear arms.


For the record, I'd like every adult US citizen to see every wounded and dead soldier's photo so they don't forget what's behind all the rhetoric that got them wounded/killed in the first place.
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#31 Sep 05 2009 at 2:29 PM Rating: Excellent
Wait, Mass Effect has blue alien sideboob?


That's really all I've taken away from this thread.
#32 Sep 05 2009 at 2:35 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
NixNot wrote:
Wait, Mass Effect has blue alien sideboob?


That's really all I've taken away from this thread.


I was surprised too. I had to google it to see it.

I was disappointed, greatly.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#33 Sep 05 2009 at 2:39 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
I wish the networks and newspapers let the last administration make them a brunch of Pussies, who sterilize news reports from the front lines.

Soldiers get wounded and die and to try to say that we shouldn't have to face reality because it offends members of their family who support their son going to war but not wanting to face how he died is a shame.

How strange it seems to me having watch nightly coverage of the war in Southeast Asia. I'm thankful my parents didn't censor what news we watched as children. Instead they made sure we talked about what we saw and learn not to glorify war. Photography has been showing the results of battles since the Civil War. Though Bradly did stage many of his photos of Gettysburg.

Then the last administration try to keep us from the truth of their fail wars and a chance to show our respect to the men and women who died in Iraq. All the while making the most of photos of Bush at Ground Zero and in a flight jacket before a Mission Accomplish sign.

okay, I'm tire of reading right wing loons create lies, that anyone with a brain can see through. I'm going to go knit some and maybe read a decent book about war. Darn Turtledove for starting another alt history series of WWII. At least he allows his characters to admit that they needed to change their underware the first time they faced combat and death.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#34 Sep 05 2009 at 2:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

And for the record. Im a Paramedic.


Probably not, although you do display the requisite "too stupid to make it through medical school" vibe and tweeker characteristics so as to make it barely plausible.

Why you're a cowardly pussy doesn't particularly interest me.


The picture is being used to make a political statement. This kids parents asked that the AP not release the picture and they did anyway.


Who gives a fuc[/i][/i]k? They don't own the photo, or their child's memory. Maybe the kid would have wanted only for it to be published.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#35 Sep 05 2009 at 4:10 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
Wait, Mass Effect has blue alien sideboob?


On a couple of assari, if memory serves. I'm thinking of Benezia and the dancers at chora's den.

There also might be some sideboob in the liara romance arc.
#36 Sep 05 2009 at 4:54 PM Rating: Default
I'm honestly surprised by how many of you seem to find it perfectly OK to publicly disrespect the family of a man who died on the battlefield in such a way. It seems to me sometimes that politics overrides common decency, and for all the intelligence feigned in this forum, that very common decency (and sense) seems ultimately irrelevant or non-existent. Yes, this type of thing is shown all the time and is hardly anything for the general public to get upset about, but it seems pretty cut and dry to me that a family not wanting a photo of the bloodied and dying body of their son/brother/father to be used as political currency should have such a request granted out of respect for the dead, if nothing else.

#37 Sep 05 2009 at 8:18 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
BrownDuck wrote:
I'm honestly surprised by how many of you seem to find it perfectly OK to publicly disrespect the family of a man who died on the battlefield in such a way. It seems to me sometimes that politics overrides common decency, and for all the intelligence feigned in this forum, that very common decency (and sense) seems ultimately irrelevant or non-existent. Yes, this type of thing is shown all the time and is hardly anything for the general public to get upset about, but it seems pretty cut and dry to me that a family not wanting a photo of the bloodied and dying body of their son/brother/father to be used as political currency should have such a request granted out of respect for the dead, if nothing else.



I agree it was disrespectful to do this. I think what most people on this forum take umbrage with is how ThiefX acts soooo shocked that it happens, when, as has been said, similar stories are exploited all the time by both sides. Saying "Liberals have no shame" is ridiculous. It is perfectly accurate to say "And neither do conservatives." Hell, even libertarians or the rainbow green party might not have shame if it would advance their cause.

Nothing wrong with showing pictures of war and reminding the public of the cost it inflicts; however, it would be nice to go with the family's wishes in cases like these. Same deal with the Ted Kennedy thing; sure, there might not be any LEGAL reason to hold off on criticism or debate what afterlife debates the guy, but most people would consider common decency and bite their tongues.

Alas, some conservatives have no shame.
Liberals too.
#38 Sep 05 2009 at 8:35 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
BrownDuck wrote:
It seems to me sometimes that politics overrides common decency

What politics? This excuse may have at least had traction during the last administration when we could pretend that the Liberal Media just wanted to take Bush down but are you suggesting that the Liberal Media wants to take Obama down? If so, isn't the answer that the media isn't being "political" in that way at all? Hell, at least blame it on them wanting to sell papers or something.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#39 Sep 05 2009 at 9:11 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
It seems to me sometimes that politics overrides common decency

What politics? This excuse may have at least had traction during the last administration when we could pretend that the Liberal Media just wanted to take Bush down but are you suggesting that the Liberal Media wants to take Obama down? If so, isn't the answer that the media isn't being "political" in that way at all? Hell, at least blame it on them wanting to sell papers or something.


Politics is much more than just the U.S. government or democrats vs republicans. Your immediate jump to infer that this is some how a Bush vs. Obama or Dem vs. Pubbie argument is off the mark. In this particular case, I'd say the politics were of a corporate nature at the AP, and quite possibly several anti-war agendas at the local publisher level.

#40 Sep 05 2009 at 9:27 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
BrownDuck wrote:
In this particular case, I'd say the politics were of a corporate nature at the AP, and quite possibly several anti-war agendas at the local publisher level.

Well, as long as you're just talking out your ***, it's okay to blame it all on some undefined and nebulous "politics" then. Carry on.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#41 Sep 05 2009 at 9:30 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
BrownDuck wrote:
In this particular case, I'd say the politics were of a corporate nature at the AP, and quite possibly several anti-war agendas at the local publisher level.

Well, as long as you're just talking out your ***, it's okay to blame it all on some undefined and nebulous "politics" then. Carry on.


What... because I'm unable to simplify it to ____ vs Obama or ____ vs Liberals, you simply dismiss it as "talking out of my ***"? That's real intelligent.
#42 Sep 05 2009 at 9:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
No, because you can't do any better than "It's corporate politics". What's "corporate politics"? What exactly are you accusing folks of? What are you accusing them of trying to gain? I mean, if you're going to smear someone, can't you do better than "umm.... politics!"?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#43 Sep 05 2009 at 9:55 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
What are you accusing them of trying to gain?


Tell more people that "war is [i]bad[/i"]?

I can see it as political in the same sense that some broad war theory or activism is political, or that all media is inherently political. It's not exactly an original message or anything, but I don't know what else to call it when you make a story or statement about an issue of the times: art?
#44 Sep 05 2009 at 10:03 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Tell more people that "war is bad"?

I don't think you can take that from just a photo. There were plenty of photos of the dead and wounded taken since the American Civil War and they certainly weren't all taken with the agenda of saying "War is bad" from a political perspective.
Quote:
or that all media is inherently political.

In which case, it's pointless to try to call them out on it. Publishing, not publishing it, using it to mop their floors, publishing the daily Dow, whatever is all "political". Which is what I meant by nebulous -- at that point, calling it "political" is meaningless.

Maybe there's an excellent case to be made for it being specifically political but I haven't heard one yet.

Edited, Sep 6th 2009 1:04am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#45 Sep 05 2009 at 10:22 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
Wait, Mass Effect has blue alien sideboob?


On a couple of assari, if memory serves. I'm thinking of Benezia and the dancers at chora's den.

There also might be some sideboob in the liara romance arc.


The sideboob is from the sex scene with Liara. Getting with Ashley shows you some awkwardly rendered shoulderblades and that's it. I'm not sure about Kaiden because, well. I don't play females in RPGs. I find it difficult.

Considering that it's Nix we're talking to, I should point out that Mass Effect caught a little bit of flak since its romance subplots featured two guy-girl relationships, a girl-guy relationship, a girl-girl relationship and absolutely no guy-guy action whatsoever. I wasn't surprised, because the game is basically a twenty-four-hour long interactive action film, but some people got mad because they thought it was unfair that a sex scene with a tentacle-headed bisexual hermaphrodite was put ahead of any noteworthy homosexual interaction, especially between men.
#46 Sep 05 2009 at 11:09 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
I don't play females in RPGs. I find it difficult.


A play females almost always Smiley: frown

Quote:
In which case, it's pointless to try to call them out on it.


More or less yeah. It's political in some sense, but not a particularly bad one.
#47 Sep 05 2009 at 11:20 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
I don't play females in RPGs. I find it difficult.


A play females almost always Smiley: frown


Glad I'm not the only one. Smiley: laugh


zepoodle wrote:
Now that I've seen it, the picture is not at all that graphic. This reminds me of when people got all freaked out about the blue alien sideboob in Mass Effect.


Actually, I think this is a very different case from the Mass Effect one. Many people upset by this are upset because this was shown against the wishes of the family(I happen to agree with Locke's statement about the whole matter). The contents of the image itself is mostly irrelevant, it's that the family doesn't want it shown.

The issue with Mass Effect was that some woman heard that the game had some sex in it and then blew that WAY out of proportion(with a good helping hand from Fox News). They so failed to do their research that Jack Thompson released a statement to the effect of it being "not that bad".
#48 Sep 06 2009 at 1:28 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
A play females almost always Smiley: frown


While I do enjoy looking at a woman in a skin-tight suit for hours on end, I find it hard to get properly immersed when I'm pretending to be someone with totally different genitalia. I just can't connect to the character very well. This probably bodes extremely ill for my future relationships.

Quote:
Actually, I think this is a very different case from the Mass Effect one. Many people upset by this are upset because this was shown against the wishes of the family(I happen to agree with Locke's statement about the whole matter). The contents of the image itself is mostly irrelevant, it's that the family doesn't want it shown.

The issue with Mass Effect was that some woman heard that the game had some sex in it and then blew that WAY out of proportion(with a good helping hand from Fox News). They so failed to do their research that Jack Thompson released a statement to the effect of it being "not that bad".


Well, yeah. It's not exactly a case of alien sideboob. That was just what sprung to mind when I saw the picture.

Also, it gave me an excuse to use the phrase "blue alien sideboob."

Edited, Sep 6th 2009 9:31am by zepoodle
#49 Sep 06 2009 at 5:02 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
They so failed to do their research that Jack Thompson released a statement to the effect of it being "not that bad".


You know you messed up when Jack Thompson says you overreacted...
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#50 Sep 06 2009 at 9:59 AM Rating: Excellent
I'm sorry, but this is ridiculous. Do you know how many pictures of dead civilians are printed? And I'm sure it's almost always against the wishes of the family. Why should this one Marine be so special?

I feel compassion for the dead Marine's family, sure. I'm sorry their son is dead. But this is a war, and it's a war that's been dumbed down for the citizens of the US so much that a picture of a dying Marine is controversial?? How many times have you people seen Michael Jackson being hauled out of his home on a stretcher? How many times have you watched the nightly news with popcorn in your laps, staring with rapt attention at a five car pile up on the interstate where people have died?

My husband, who works for a newspaper, said it best, I think. He said, "This being such a big deal makes me realize that we should've been allowed to show these photos from the very beginning."

This is a war. It's about time that the unpleasant side was shown to the people who don't have to put their lives on the line. I'm terribly sorry that this guys parents didn't want this photo printed, but they are no different from the thousands of cases all across the country where journalists publish a picture that family members would rather they didn't. They are not in public relations, they are in the business of getting news out. This, quite obviously is news.
#51 Sep 06 2009 at 10:00 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
In which case, it's pointless to try to call them out on it. Publishing, not publishing it, using it to mop their floors, publishing the daily Dow, whatever is all "political". Which is what I meant by nebulous -- at that point, calling it "political" is meaningless.


My original statement was general in nature. You're the one who tried to assign some specifics to it. Go figure. The AP did, however, put some internal or personal agenda ahead of compassion and respect for the dead - a pretty clear example of politics overriding common decency, which is exactly what I said. The continuation of that in this forum by way of blaming "liberals" for it and the subsequent "liberal defense" of the reporting simply furthers my claim. To me, a case like this has absolutely nothing to do with either side of the political spectrum. It should have been about respect for the dead and the family, nothing more or less. Next thing you know, a fallen solder's wife will hear her dead husband's name on the nightly news before she hears it from the DOD.

I don't claim to know what drove the AP to release the photo in spite of the pleas of the family (short of what they've actually said), nor do I know the reason behind the decision to publish by local media outlets. Therefore, I cannot tell you what you asked for. I can tell you that common decency took a back seat to something, here, and "politics" is most certainly a valid description of that something, in the absence of specifics.

Edited, Sep 6th 2009 1:02pm by BrownDuck
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 274 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (274)