Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

First ever single molecule "imaged" with AFMFollow

#1 Aug 31 2009 at 7:17 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
I'm sorry, I'm having image upload problems. But this link is totally worth gaping at.

A team at IBM have used an AFM, a carbon monoxide molecule as a "tuning fork", to record the image of a Pentacene molecule, commonly used in solar cells. It's a very regular molecule, with 22 carbon atoms and 14 hydrogen atoms in a neat array. My little heart totally geeked out looking at the two pictures, the one of the actual, real tiny single little molecule, compared with the graphical mock-up of the atomic array.

This is the first time Atomic Force Microscopy has been used to image a single molecule. It is already done routinely using scanning tunneling microscopy which uses the variation in quantum tunneling current between a probe and the surface as it is rastered across.

AFM tips are all kinds of exciting to scientists, compared to scanning Tunneling microscopy, because the AFM can physically move a single molecule around on a surface, hopefully with precision. New technologies are opening up!

Edited, Aug 31st 2009 11:30am by Aripyanfar
#2 Aug 31 2009 at 7:53 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Neato.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#3 Aug 31 2009 at 7:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
That is weirdly compelling, although I have no insight at all into its potential use.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#4 Aug 31 2009 at 8:17 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Samira wrote:
That is weirdly compelling, although I have no insight at all into its potential use.


If they can nudge single molecules around physically, nano machines and tiny chemical laboratories, and tiny chips on which biochemicals for medicines are adhered all probably become easier to make.

But I just loved looking at a real piece of something of very very little physical. It's hardly there. The "light path" between each atom, we don't even see that actual electron whizzing around. just the path of probability made visible.
#5 Aug 31 2009 at 8:26 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
that is pretty cool
#6 Aug 31 2009 at 8:28 AM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
It looks pretty blurry. I think I see bigfoot in that picture.
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#7 Aug 31 2009 at 9:05 AM Rating: Decent
Keeper of the Shroud
*****
13,632 posts
The guys that did it look exactly the way I expected they would look.
#8 Aug 31 2009 at 9:06 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I've got a friend who works for IBM researching this kind of thig. Pretty neat, I've gotta get his take on it.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#9 Aug 31 2009 at 9:09 AM Rating: Good
Very very cool.

Nice to see over a hundred years of atomic theory proven with one single fuzzy image.
#10 Aug 31 2009 at 9:32 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
GOGO 300GHZ processors and laptops with 3 year battery life.
#11 Aug 31 2009 at 10:04 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
Nice to see over a hundred years of atomic theory proven with one single fuzzy image.


Images don't prove, measurement of forces do.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#12 Aug 31 2009 at 10:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Timelordwho wrote:
Quote:
Nice to see over a hundred years of atomic theory proven with one single fuzzy image.


Images don't prove, measurement of forces do.


So if I wanted to prove your mother was massive, I'd use a gravimeter rather than an imaging satellite?

Edited, Aug 31st 2009 6:14pm by Kavekk
#13 Aug 31 2009 at 10:40 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
So if I wanted to prove your mother was massive, I'd use a gravimeter rather than an imaging satellite?


Or measuring tape.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#14 Aug 31 2009 at 11:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Considering the measurements in nanometers were included along with the image, I think it counts.
#15 Aug 31 2009 at 3:41 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

It makes you awe a bit at how accurately physicists depicted the shape of something they could neither see nor feel.



Edited, Aug 31st 2009 6:41pm by trickybeck
#16 Aug 31 2009 at 3:50 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Hmmm, interesting - I was reading about how the microscope works. As Aripyanfar said, it's sort of like a tuning fork. Or really more like a record needle. The needle makes contact with the surface of the object, and a laser reads how the needle bounces up and down. So they're not actually recording light that's reflecting off the molecule itself, which is kinda disappointing to me for some reason.

#17 Aug 31 2009 at 4:10 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Wow, pretty cool.

It's gotta be pretty exciting for chemists to see that the structures they've eeked out over the years, based on the various properties of the atoms seems to be pretty much on the mark.

The molecule they used is particularly interesting if anyone recalls the oddity of the benzene ring and it's rather unusual ringlike covalent bonding.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#18 Aug 31 2009 at 9:12 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Yeah, benzene rings were one of my favourites back in high school chemistry. Very neat, very logical. Pretty. Turn up just about everywhere.
#19 Sep 01 2009 at 11:08 AM Rating: Decent
trickybeck wrote:
So they're not actually recording light that's reflecting off the molecule itself, which is kinda disappointing to me for some reason.
The problem with using light for this is that you'd need to use extremely short-waved light (up in the X-ray/gamma ray region), which, as fifty years of comic books have shown us, is liable to give us a superpowered mutant pentacene molecule that will escape and begin to enslave unsuspecting people.

Or break it apart due to having enough energy per photon to easily break bonds, thereby rendering an attempt to view it useless.
#20 Sep 01 2009 at 12:10 PM Rating: Good
Aripyanfar wrote:

If they can nudge single molecules around physically, nano machines and tiny chemical laboratories, and tiny chips on which biochemicals for medicines are adhered all probably become easier to make.


IBM also did that in 1989.

http://nanotechnologysite.info/nanotechnology/1989-i-b-m-spelled-in-xenon-atoms/

As I recall, they also used AFM to image it, but that was atoms on a surface, not a single molecule.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 271 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (271)