Jophiel wrote:
That's fine. If someone's being a dink, I have no problem with 1000 people saying "Hey, you're a dink!".
Ok. But that's not what's happening. What's happening is that one person is being a dink, and a thousand people, instead of telling him he's a dink tell everyone they can find about how bad said dinkiness is, giving the perception that it's a whole host of people being dinks and not just the one. That's the point at which we should have a problem because it creates a perception that is far out of step with reality.
Quote:
I thought we didn't read political blogs?
I googled. Found thread after thread of people talking about how mean conservatives were being. While I admit to only checking about a half dozen or so links off my google search, I failed to find a
single instance of a conservative actually saying the things in question. All of the cases were liberals loudly proclaiming how mean conservatives were being.
See how that fits the "problem case" I outline above?
Kinda reminds me of two bloggers on a conservative site saying that they didn't like Jindals speech being repeated by every single liberal blog, online news site, and even referenced on CNN. Yup. It's just like that...
Quote:
The funniest part is the logical twists you need to make to say "The people trying to pass the piece of legislature Kennedy wanted have no interest in Kennedy! They only want to pass the piece of legislature that Kennedy always wanted and it's WRONG!" with a straight face.
No. It's wrong to take advantage of someone's death to push a political agenda. Whether by drawing on pity for the dead, or acrimony towards anyone who opposes the proposal, it's still wrong.
By making a big deal about "passing one for the
GipperTedster", the Dems are playing on the worst aspect of victim politics. We're supposed to allow them to push their policies out of respect for the dead? I'm sorry, that doesn't wash. It was a bad idea to pass overbearing gun control by naming it the "Brady Bill", and it is a bad idea to try to pass overbearing health reform by renaming it the "Kennedy Bill" (or whatever).
If you want to honor his legacy, pass it. Cleanly. Respectfully. Honestly. Don't play on the emotions of a death to try to drum up public sympathy for something the public would normally oppose. That's got to be the worst reason to pass a piece of legislation IMO...