Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

The Dems Give Up On RepublicansFollow

#52 Aug 20 2009 at 11:43 AM Rating: Decent
Red,

Quote:
What the **** do the ***** have to do with any of this? Is this really the level of debate Republicans have fallen to?


So it's ok when the Dems compare a president to Hitler and the ***** but when republican voters, not politicians mind you, decide to make some comparisons of their own this gets your panties in a twist?

Quote:
The fact Republicans focus so much on non-existant issues


Socialism in the US is not a non-existant issue.
#53 Aug 20 2009 at 11:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT

I don't think that article says what you want it to say.
Article wrote:
Michael Vujovich, 61, of Windsor was taken to Detroit's Henry Ford Hospital for an angioplasty procedure after he went to a Windsor hospital in April. Vujovich said the U.S. backup doesn't show a gap in Canada's system, but shows how it works.

"I go to the hospital in Windsor and two hours later, I'm done having angioplasty in Detroit," he said. His $38,000 bill was covered by the Ontario health ministry.

Apparently the doctors in Detroit are pleased as punch to accept payments from Canada's government system and Canada is able to expand coverage by striking arrangements with US doctors. Given that Windsor is three minutes from Detroit and the next large town (London with 350,000) is over two hours from Windsor, arranging for specific complicated procedures to be done in Detroit makes a lot of sense.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#54 Aug 20 2009 at 11:47 AM Rating: Good
Honestly, what's so wrong with killing the elderly? They're old and useless. The commune no longer has no need of them, so why not discard them? It'd be for the good of all of us - except the ones who are dead, of course.
#55 Aug 20 2009 at 11:48 AM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
zepoodle wrote:
It's a name, Gbaji. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is nothing of the sort, and neither was the National Socialist Worker's Party, nor the Holy Roman Empire.


Just because names are not always accurate does not mean that they are never accurate.

Quote:
The Democrats have no intention of bypassing the country's democratic system to push through healthcare reform.


At the risk of further Godwining the thread, the ****'s didn't bypass the country's democratic system either. At every step of the way, they gained sufficient popular support and parliamentary support to pass each new law.

While that doesn't mean we chuck out Democracy because it *can* lead to a bad result, it does mean that we should be vigilant in our duty to ensure that we don't hand too much power to those who lead us. Does the health care issue do this? Of course not. But why hand more power to the government than we have to?


We can solve the majority of issues people have with health care right now without resorting to a government funded option. That's really the problem here. There's a disconnect between what the public is complaining about and what the Democrats are offering them. It's a classic bait and switch. People complain about some very specific aspects of health care. The Dems take on the mantle of "fixing health care", but decide to fix the things that they want to fix (ie: eliminate the private funding in favor of government funding). And they are holding the legitimate problems with health care over the publics head in order to force their solution on them.


The public doesn't want the government paying for health care in this way. What they want is to allow providers to compete across state lines. What they want is assurances that their care wont be canceled on a technicality if they get sick. What they want is to be more easily able to transfer health care from job to job. None of those require government funded pools of health care. And the majority of Americans don't want that. But that's what the Dems have decided is their dealbreaker issue. They wont do any health care reform if it doesn't contain a public option (or so they have stated). That puts them firmly in the position of blocking real health care reform in order to pursue their own partisan agenda.


And that's why people are protesting this in large numbers. Not out of a love of the insurance companies. Not because the Republican party bussed them in. But because they don't want what the Democrats are selling. Pure and simple.

Quote:
Conflict in government is basically the foundation of fair government; it ensures compromise instead of absolutes.


Yup. Which makes you wonder why the Dems wont compromise...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#56 Aug 20 2009 at 11:50 AM Rating: Good
Hahahahahhhhahhahaaa Gbaji. So, it's allll about small government really. Those right wings pundits must have hated Dubya, and his big government. No wait, they had their nose up his ***....

Tell us more oh pointy haired one.
#57 Aug 20 2009 at 11:51 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
Quote:
If the Candian Healthcare system is so much better than the U.S. then why does this happen?


http://freep.com/article/20090820/BUSINESS06/908200420/1319/
There's a number of reasons.

Some people are just rich, and can afford to have non essential medical stuff done in the states, or non emergency stuff done faster.

In some cases, due to the fact that Canada is not as densly populated as the states, it's not cost effective to set up a certain type of service, or to expand an existing one, due to the rare demand. In this case it is cheaper to go directly to the hospitals in the States, which due to higher population density have these services.

Non of these have anything to do with publicly provided health care. It's still covered by Canadian health care which is the point. Instead of making people wait when there is an unexpected rush of a certain type of medical situation, we can leverage your greater capacity to help people faster. Note that your greater capacity is linked to population and not to whose paying for the service.

I wouldn't really expect you to have actually thought about that though. Go back to cheer leading Gbaji, you're much better at that.

edit: Or what joph said.

Edited, Aug 20th 2009 2:58pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#58 Aug 20 2009 at 11:57 AM Rating: Good
****
4,512 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
So it's ok when the Dems compare a president to Hitler and the ***** but when republican voters, not politicians mind you, decide to make some comparisons of their own this gets your panties in a twist?


I don't think anyone who consistently posts in this forum has ever compared Bush to Hitler, nor would they condone it. Nice try though, sweetums.

gbaji wrote:
Just because names are not always accurate does not mean that they are never accurate.


There was very little socialistic behavior from the *****. The majority of their somewhat-socialist policies were designed to get public favor. The fact that you feel the ***** were socialist shows that you fell for the same sh*t the people of Germany did back then.

Edited, Aug 20th 2009 3:57pm by CBD
#59 Aug 20 2009 at 11:59 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
I wish Gbaji would just stop talking about fucking ***** Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#60 Aug 20 2009 at 12:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
At the risk of further Godwining the thread, the ****'s didn't bypass the country's democratic system either.

Remember back when the election was going on and Palin was sitting up on stages working the crowd into a frenzy by saying that "Obama pals around with terrorists!" and the McCain campaign was working its damnedest to link Obama to Ayers? And then Gbaji would come on here with some pollyanna comments about how the real concern was Ayers' political philosophies and what he thought of education and all that. See, it wasn't that Palin was trying trying to work her folks into a froth over Obama being BFFs with America-hating terrorist monsters, it was really Ayers' positions on education that were the problem.

Obviously, this was retarded beyond description.

And now we have Gbaji jumping up and down comparing liberals and health care reform to the *****. Oh, but we're not talking about which side has the most people who say "Those other races need to be done away with before they destroy out culture and values" or the people saying "Those other people are the reason for our economic problems and the reason I don't have a job". We're not talking about which political parties feed into that ideology and use it to get votes. No, we're just worried about who wants "big government" and, gosh, we're only talking about ***** because they wanted big government! Why, it's just by accident that we're talking about a group who personified evil by scapegoating other races and loading them up to be murdered by the millions because that's not really the sort of thought we're trying for when we connect an emotionally charged catch-word with the liberals. It's really all very innocent.

I mean, the Swedes are socialists, right? We could have been comparing the liberals to Sweden except that it's one more letter to have to type than ***** so comparing liberals to ***** (Oh, but only the big government thing) obviously makes a lot more sense.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#61 Aug 20 2009 at 12:03 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Technogeek wrote:
Hahahahahhhhahhahaaa Gbaji. So, it's allll about small government really. Those right wings pundits must have hated Dubya, and his big government.


Small government is not about the dollar amount of the budget.


And yeah. A lot of conservative pundits attacked Bush just as much as the liberals. For different reasons mind you, but I don't recall a single conservative pundit saying that Bush was a bad president because he just didn't oppress people of color enough...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#62 Aug 20 2009 at 12:07 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I wish Gbaji would just stop talking about fucking *****.


I mentioned it one time. As a joke. All the other responses on my part have been to liberals falling over themselves to insist that ***** weren't socialist, and they didn't follow a democratic process, and other fun things to talk about.


Sensitive much? Really. I don't care about this. I just figured it might rile you guys up a bit and the first post I responded to was such a slowball, I couldn't resist. Stop trying to insist that the ***** really didn't have anything at all in common with the political left and I'll drop the subject. Honestly, aside from some very basic ideological assumptions, they shared nothing in common with modern US liberals. It's just funny to watch you guys scramble to try to insist that there's *nothing* in common at all.

OMG! The ***** were made up of people. The Democrats are made up of people! The Democrats are just like the *****! Run for the hills!


Lol...

Edited, Aug 20th 2009 1:08pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#63 Aug 20 2009 at 12:10 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
gbaji wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I wish Gbaji would just stop talking about fucking *****.


I mentioned it one time. As a joke. All the other responses on my part have been to liberals falling over themselves to insist that ***** were socialist, and they didn't follow a democratic process, and other fun things to talk about.


Nice try on the edit, slick Smiley: laugh
#64 Aug 20 2009 at 12:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
As a joke.

Heh.

Perhaps if this was the first time you had tried to connect Obama/Democrats and liberalism to the **** party, you'd have some credibility in your backpedaling.

Edited, Aug 20th 2009 3:13pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#65 Aug 20 2009 at 12:30 PM Rating: Default
**
739 posts
Quote:
I don't think that article says what you want it to say
.

You mean the part where the women diagnosed with cancer and was turned down by Canadian doctors for a bone marrow transplant came to the US and got one that saved her life.

You mean that Part?


I
Quote:
wouldn't really expect you to have actually thought about that though. Go back to cheer leading Gbaji, you're much better at that.

edit: Or what joph said.



When your done blowing Joph I think Pensive and Kavekk want thier turn.


#66 Aug 20 2009 at 12:33 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
ThiefX wrote:
Quote:
I don't think that article says what you want it to say
.

You mean the part where the women diagnosed with cancer and was turned down by Canadian doctors for a bone marrow transplant came to the US and got one that saved her life.

You mean that Part?
you mean the part where they couldn't find a matching donor, but the US hospital could, and the government still covered it? This article is a great example of how a public system can still be flexible and leverage available services. Thanks.
Quote:
When your done blowing Joph I think Pensive and Kavekk want thier turn.
Smiley: laugh I was just letting you know another post you could read, since I didn't really think you'd be up to actually understanding a post that had more then one sentence.

I'm angling to get him to give me some of his post count

Edited, Aug 20th 2009 3:35pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#67 Aug 20 2009 at 12:35 PM Rating: Good
****
4,512 posts
ThiefX wrote:
You mean the part where the women diagnosed with cancer and was turned down by Canadian doctors for a bone marrow transplant came to the US and got one that saved her life.


There was no mention of such a woman.

Oh! Wait! You mean the man who wanted the bone marrow transplant? I guess that shows how well you read the actual article.

It doesn't say that Canada does not do bone marrow transplants or that he was willingly turned down by the doctors.

EDIT: Making me mess up pronouns now. Must be a conservative conspiracy.

Edited, Aug 20th 2009 4:37pm by CBD
#68 Aug 20 2009 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
The article does clarify, and it's basically small city combined with the inability to find a matching blood donor. It's not on the front page though.

Quote:
Sensitive much?
You get this based on my language? I thought I was making a rather bad joke myself.

Edited, Aug 20th 2009 3:38pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#69 Aug 20 2009 at 12:37 PM Rating: Good
****
4,512 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
The article does clarify, and it's basically small city combined with the inability to find a matching blood donor. It's not on the front page though.


Yeah, that was a total brain fart for me, I was confusing this with another article when I wrote that part.
#70 Aug 20 2009 at 12:38 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
ThiefX wrote:
Quote:
I don't think that article says what you want it to say
.

You mean the part where the women diagnosed with cancer and was turned down by Canadian doctors for a bone marrow transplant came to the US and got one that saved her life.

You mean that Part?

Smiley: laughSmiley: laughSmiley: laughSmiley: laugh


Oh man, this is going to be too fun.

Quote:
Dany Mercado, a leukemia patient from Kitchener, Ontario, is cancer-free after getting a bone marrow transplant at the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit.

Told by Canadian doctors in 2007 he couldn't have the procedure there, Mercado's family and doctor appealed to Ontario health officials, who agreed to let him have the transplant in Detroit in January 2008.

...

Mercado, 26, faced a longer wait because he could not find a matching blood donor, even though his family conducted a broad search.


Fantastic, bud. You didn't even get the gender right, never mind the point!

Edit: Ninja'ed Smiley: bah

Edited, Aug 20th 2009 4:38pm by LockeColeMA
#71 Aug 20 2009 at 12:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
ThiefX wrote:
You mean the part where the women diagnosed with cancer and was turned down by Canadian doctors for a bone marrow transplant came to the US and got one that saved her life.

Smiley: laugh

Yeah, as already pointed out, you have the details of the story wrong. Hell, you have the entire plot wrong. But it sure did put the fear of Canadian health care into me when I learned that the Canadian government ultimately paid for a man to get expensive transplants in a US hospital when a suitable donor was found there. I mean, I feel much better knowing that the US government would never, ever pay money to save my life in a hospital in Ontario.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#72 Aug 20 2009 at 12:55 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
Admiral LockeColeMA wrote:
Edit: Ninja'ed Smiley: bah
haha
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#73 Aug 20 2009 at 1:02 PM Rating: Default
**
739 posts
Quote:
Yeah, as already pointed out, you have the details of the story wrong. Hell, you have the entire plot wrong. But it sure did put the fear of Canadian health care into me when I learned that the Canadian government ultimately paid for a man to get expensive transplants in a US hospital when a suitable donor was found there. I mean, I feel much better knowing that the US government would never, ever pay money to save my life in a hospital in Ontario
.

So I made a mistake and said she instead of he and that changes all of this?

Quote:
Dany Mercado, a leukemia patient from Kitchener, Ontario, is cancer-free after getting a bone marrow transplant at the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit.



Told by Canadian doctors in 2007 he couldn't have the procedure there, Mercado's family and doctor appealed to Ontario health officials, who agreed to let him have the transplant in Detroit in January 2008.



The Karmanos Institute is one of several Detroit health facilities that care for Canadians needing services not widely available in Canada.


Canada, for example, has waiting times for bariatric procedures to combat obesity that can stretch to more than five years, according to a June report in the Canadian Journal of Surgery.


Saying She instead of he doesn't mean that countless Canadians cross the border every year to use our "worse" healthcare system?











Edited, Aug 20th 2009 5:04pm by ThiefX
#74 Aug 20 2009 at 1:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Hahahahaha! Look, you should have told me you were illiterate. We could find help for you.

"Told by Canadian doctors that he couldn't have the procedure there" refers to not having it at the medical center in Detroit. Mercado found a donor in Detroit, was told "You can't have it done there" (at least, not paid by the Canadian government), appealed to the officials in Onatario and got their blessing.
Quote:
countless Canadians cross the border every year to use our "worse" healthcare system?

Erm, you realize that the "worse" part applies not to potential quality of care in the US but to being blocked from that care due to cost, right? And that having the Canadian government pick up the tab for your medical care negates the whole "How do I pay for it?" problem the US system has?

Do you even think before you type? Varus makes better points than you do. Go back to cheerleading for Gbaji, please.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#75 Aug 20 2009 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Thief, what part of a population 350000 town 3 minutes from a very big city confuses you? Let me guess, all of it. It's about leveraging services that aren't cost effective. It's cheaper for the government to send a few people to detroit then it would be to build facilities that would be empty most of the time.

You're still missing the point. Smiley: laugh

Quote:
Do you even think before you type? Varus makes better points than you do. Go back to cheerleading for Gbaji, please.
To be fair, he's not nearly as experienced as Varus. He should probably buy a car and go pick up college chicks.

Edited, Aug 20th 2009 4:17pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#76 Aug 20 2009 at 1:23 PM Rating: Default
Jophed,

Quote:
Varus makes better points than you do.


I make better points than everyone.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 292 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (292)