Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
I wish I could bear his child.
You are a woman, it's not your choice if you have his kid or not.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Buawhahahaha! The Hellbeast goes postal!
Buawhahahaha! The Hellbeast goes postal!Follow
You are a woman, it's not your choice if you have his kid or not.
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Kavekk wrote:
I bet this troll sock wishes he was as irrepressible as me.
Fixed?
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
I bet this troll sock wishes he was as irrepressible as me.
Fixed?
Technically both are true. I chose troll because it sounds more menacing and I'm bad to the bone.
Yes, you are. /pat
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
TirithRR wrote:
Majivo wrote:
we aren't bleeding - unless we get all pissy and go stab a guy.
But then it's not really you bleeding, it's the other guy.
The testosterone leaves us in such a blinding rage that we're equally likely to miss and stab ourselves in the thigh.
Could be worse, though. If we were women, we probably couldn't even penetrate the skin, right? Right?
Samira wrote:
Yes, you are. /pat
You know, I have two scars. That's pretty badass, right? Irrepressibly so, one might say.
Kavekk wrote:
Samira wrote:
Yes, you are. /pat
You know, I have two scars. That's pretty badass, right? Irrepressibly so, one might say.
Stretch marks are a form of scarring.
zepoodle wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Samira wrote:
Yes, you are. /pat
You know, I have two scars. That's pretty badass, right? Irrepressibly so, one might say.
Stretch marks are a form of scarring.
One's just below my eyebrow, the other's on my nose.
Women often faint in my presence, you know.
Kavekk wrote:
zepoodle wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Samira wrote:
Yes, you are. /pat
You know, I have two scars. That's pretty badass, right? Irrepressibly so, one might say.
Stretch marks are a form of scarring.
One's just below my eyebrow, the other's on my nose.
Women often faint in my presence, you know.
I'd imagine so if you have stretch marks on your nose.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samira wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
zepoodle wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Samira wrote:
Yes, you are. /pat
You know, I have two scars. That's pretty badass, right? Irrepressibly so, one might say.
Stretch marks are a form of scarring.
One's just below my eyebrow, the other's on my nose.
Women often faint in my presence, you know.
I'd imagine so if you have stretch marks on your nose.
I just can't stop lying.
I am as to lying as a kleptomaniac is to thievery.
I feel that way about potato chips.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Kavekk wrote:
You know, I have two scars. That's pretty badass, right? Irrepressibly so, one might say.
Are we sharing scar stories now?
My worst scar ever came from bursting open my chest.
On the first day of 6th grade (11 years old, for foreigners,) I found my long lost yellow gameboy pocket, with my longer, loster, copy of pokemon blue in it. I was so ridiculously chuffed that I rushed down the stairs to tell my mother, who was in our kitchen. Unbeknown to me, she had just spilled water on the floor, and had turned to answer the phone before cleaning it up. My eager little self, wanting to inform her of the amazing news, rushed into the kitchen, slipped on the water, the torque of which turn me to the right and face down, landing squarely on the point of an opened wooden floor cabinent.
40 stitches, a tetanus shot, a brusied rib, and 5 days of Mario RPG.
Was it worth it? Well you decide, I got the fourth star that day.
Sammy, are you making the case that George Bush Sr. is less talented than Hillary? Or are you just stating that he comes from a privileged family? Because if you sincerely are of the belief that Hillary stands shoulder to shoulder with the man I'd have to question your judgement-- which to date in my eyes has been exemplary despite our frequent difference of opinion.
Ambitious, yes. They both are or in his case was, but talent? She is nowhere near in his class.
Totem
Ambitious, yes. They both are or in his case was, but talent? She is nowhere near in his class.
Totem
"... slightly overweight..." --Monsieur L'Fromage
Hey, I am not slightly overweight, just a bit... husky. Big boned as it were. And if you keep talking like that I'm going to eat some comfort food, curl up in a big pink flannel nightgown, and watch a weepy, you big meany.
Totem
Hey, I am not slightly overweight, just a bit... husky. Big boned as it were. And if you keep talking like that I'm going to eat some comfort food, curl up in a big pink flannel nightgown, and watch a weepy, you big meany.
Totem
Majivo wrote:
it's just less noticeable
Psh, yeah right. I certainly notice it more. I'm due for another emotional period in a couple weeks actually.
Watch out.
Totem wrote:
Sammy, are you making the case that George Bush Sr. is less talented than Hillary? Or are you just stating that he comes from a privileged family? Because if you sincerely are of the belief that Hillary stands shoulder to shoulder with the man I'd have to question your judgement-- which to date in my eyes has been exemplary despite our frequent difference of opinion.
Ambitious, yes. They both are or in his case was, but talent? She is nowhere near in his class.
Totem
Ambitious, yes. They both are or in his case was, but talent? She is nowhere near in his class.
Totem
Impossible to evaluate, since by dint of class and sex they didn't start on a level playing field. Bush's family was very influential in business and political circles, and George was male at a time when that was absolutely necessary to be seriously considered for a job in 1950s era Big Oil, which would in turn allow one to make the sorts of connections that could lead to real power.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
When human males start having menstrual cycles, you let me know. Til then, your point is moot.
Wait....what?
Men have hormonal cycles. Why wouldn't they??
Quote:
1) Men's testosterone, for instance, varies and goes up and down four or five times an hour.
2) There are daily cycles with testosterone being higher in the morning and lower at night.
3) Men have a monthly hormonal cycle that is unique to each man, but men can actually track their moods and recognize they are related to hormonal changes through the month.
4) We know that there are seasonal cycles with testosterone higher in November and lower in April.
5) We know about hormonal cycles with males during adolescence, but also the years between 40 and 55 have what we call male menopause or andropause.
6) Finally, we know there are hormonal changes in men going through IMS, related to stress in a man's life.
2) There are daily cycles with testosterone being higher in the morning and lower at night.
3) Men have a monthly hormonal cycle that is unique to each man, but men can actually track their moods and recognize they are related to hormonal changes through the month.
4) We know that there are seasonal cycles with testosterone higher in November and lower in April.
5) We know about hormonal cycles with males during adolescence, but also the years between 40 and 55 have what we call male menopause or andropause.
6) Finally, we know there are hormonal changes in men going through IMS, related to stress in a man's life.
(bolding is mine)
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=53725
I'm always late to the party. :(
belialle wrote:
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
When human males start having menstrual cycles, you let me know. Til then, your point is moot.
Wait....what?
Men have hormonal cycles. Why wouldn't they??
Quote:
1) Men's testosterone, for instance, varies and goes up and down four or five times an hour.
2) There are daily cycles with testosterone being higher in the morning and lower at night.
3) Men have a monthly hormonal cycle that is unique to each man, but men can actually track their moods and recognize they are related to hormonal changes through the month.
4) We know that there are seasonal cycles with testosterone higher in November and lower in April.
5) We know about hormonal cycles with males during adolescence, but also the years between 40 and 55 have what we call male menopause or andropause.
6) Finally, we know there are hormonal changes in men going through IMS, related to stress in a man's life.
2) There are daily cycles with testosterone being higher in the morning and lower at night.
3) Men have a monthly hormonal cycle that is unique to each man, but men can actually track their moods and recognize they are related to hormonal changes through the month.
4) We know that there are seasonal cycles with testosterone higher in November and lower in April.
5) We know about hormonal cycles with males during adolescence, but also the years between 40 and 55 have what we call male menopause or andropause.
6) Finally, we know there are hormonal changes in men going through IMS, related to stress in a man's life.
(bolding is mine)
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=53725
I'm always late to the party. :(
I'm really not sure there's a point in me continuing to post in this thread since people are being so willfully ignorant about this, but even if men DO have hormonal cycles that could be considered vaguely equivalent to that of a woman, we most certainly don't have similar physical symptoms, and I don't think I'm out of line in stating that any woman who's been subject to particularly annoying, painful, or otherwise intrusive menstruation cycles can attest, it's not JUST the hormones that affect your mood, but also the physical discomfort and self-awareness that goes with. My point in even going there with this topic is to illustrate that, on average, women have a lot more going on physiologically than men do with regards to emotions and mood swings.
However, if what I'm reading here is correct, then it seems most of you would have absolutely no problem with me taking up the opinion that women deserve no special consideration of any kind for emotional outbursts related to any underlying physiological symptoms (pregnancy, PMS, menopause, etc...) because hey, guys have similar issues and women should not be given any special allowance in this regard.
Edited, Aug 13th 2009 11:30am by BrownDuck
I think it's more like your point is so stunningly moronic, that most people can't bother to dispute it. But Varrus agrees with you.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
I think it's more like your point is so stunningly moronic, that most people can't bother to dispute it. But Varrus agrees with you.
Do you agree or disagree with my last statement? And to be perfectly clear, I mean this:
Quote:
Women deserve no special consideration of any kind for emotional outbursts related to any underlying physiological symptoms (pregnancy, PMS, menopause, etc...) because hey, guys have similar issues and women should not be given any special allowance in this regard.
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
I think it's more like your point is so stunningly moronic, that most people can't bother to dispute it. But Varrus agrees with you.
Do you agree or disagree with my last statement? And to be perfectly clear, I mean this:
Quote:
Women deserve no special consideration of any kind for emotional outbursts related to any underlying physiological symptoms (pregnancy, PMS, menopause, etc...) because hey, guys have similar issues and women should not be given any special allowance in this regard.
your point is stunningly moronic
your point is stunningly moronic
your point is stunningly moronic
your point is stunningly moronic
your point is stunningly moronic
Dude, get help.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
I think it's more like your point is so stunningly moronic, that most people can't bother to dispute it. But Varrus agrees with you.
Do you agree or disagree with my last statement? And to be perfectly clear, I mean this:
Quote:
Women deserve no special consideration of any kind for emotional outbursts related to any underlying physiological symptoms (pregnancy, PMS, menopause, etc...) because hey, guys have similar issues and women should not be given any special allowance in this regard.
your point is stunningly moronic
your point is stunningly moronic
your point is stunningly moronic
your point is stunningly moronic
your point is stunningly moronic
Dude, get help.
Funny how you refuse to comment on a single simple statement regardless of the topic at hand. I think it's because you know that agreeing with my statement would be rather incorrect or at least, harmful to the female position, and that disagreeing with my statement validates my original opinion.
Quote:
Funny how you refuse to comment on a single simple statement regardless of the topic at hand. I think it's because you know that agreeing with my statement would be rather incorrect or at least, harmful to the female position, and that disagreeing with my statement validates my original opinion.
No, it's because it is moronic. Who do you associate with that you think this is a valid argument?
Also, taste the rainbow.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Quote:
Funny how you refuse to comment on a single simple statement regardless of the topic at hand. I think it's because you know that agreeing with my statement would be rather incorrect or at least, harmful to the female position, and that disagreeing with my statement validates my original opinion.
No, it's because it is moronic. Who do you associate with that you think this is a valid argument?
Also, taste the rainbow.
Agree or Disagree? Simple question.
Do women deserve a special allowance for emotional outbursts relating to or caused by PMS, pregnancy, menopause, etc..?
Recent Visitors: 496
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (496)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Buawhahahaha! The Hellbeast goes postal!
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC