Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Real Estate MarketFollow

#52 Aug 04 2009 at 10:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Want to try again? Do you agree or disagree that Obama is blowing a lot of his political capital?

Disagree. He's spending a lot of capital on things he wanted to get done. If not climate change and health care, what else is he going to do with it? Save it up for passing "Michelle Obama Day"?
Quote:
Do you agree that this process has rapidly hurt his popularity?

Yes, because it's phrased like that. The process has hurt his popularity. The phrase in vogue among the pundits right now is "sausage being made". People are sick of seeing it, hearing about it and sick of being told about it.
Quote:
Do you think that this is a problem for him?

Not really. It'd be a bigger problem to fail to deal with those issues and essentially become a caretaker president.
Quote:
How do you think this affects his effectiveness in the next year (like when it really would help the Dems up for re-election to have a popular president)?

2010 will be almost completely about two things: The unemployment rate and the Dow. If the economy is upswinging then the Democrats will be great. If it's falling or stagnant, you'll see a tough election year (although it's unlikely the Republicans will retake either chamber simply by the numbers). Passing meaningful health care reform will exaggerate a win or minimize a loss but it won't change the basic results.

Edited, Aug 4th 2009 1:53pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#53REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2009 at 11:18 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophiel,
#54 Aug 04 2009 at 11:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel wrote:
Save it up for passing "Michelle Obama Day"?
A day celebrating smoking hot middle-aged black women with sharp fashion sense and post-graduate degrees? Fucking count me in.
#55 Aug 04 2009 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good
publiusvarus wrote:
The Democrats can't even go out in public without being shouted down by mobs of angry citizens. And they're actually accusing the insurance industry of hiring these people!
Uhm... you live in crazyland.
#56REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2009 at 11:24 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Mindel,
#57 Aug 04 2009 at 11:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
And how in the h*ll can you say the economy is on an upswing when employment is down, the cost of living up, and wages down?

I said if the economy is on an upswing. Some indicators right now are looking better. Employment is always a lagging indicator since you need businesses to feel like things are going "well" before they start hiring again.
Quote:
The Democrats can't even go out in public without being shouted down by mobs of angry citizens.

Once again, you're adorable when you're so naive. Seriously, it's like having our very own little Limbaugh quoting puppy running around the forums. Don't ever change Smiley: smile
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#58 Aug 04 2009 at 11:28 AM Rating: Good
publiusvarus wrote:
Mindel,

Obviously you're not paying attention.

I live in DC and am in the vicinity of the Capitol a few times a week. Hell, I saw Frank Pallone at a ******* Harris Teeter a while back. There are no shouting crowds. Smiley: lol.
#59 Aug 04 2009 at 11:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
He's talking about staged events in which plants act as though they're spontaneously and independently interrupting town-hall meetings with their outrage. You know, after being coached through it.

The denial at the bottom is especially adorable.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#60 Aug 04 2009 at 11:42 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
He's talking about staged events in which plants act as though they're spontaneously and independently interrupting town-hall meetings with their outrage. You know, after being coached through it.

The denial at the bottom is especially adorable.
Oh, that is cute. Smiley: lol

Delicious manufactured outrage.
#61REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2009 at 12:03 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophiel,
#62REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2009 at 12:09 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#63 Aug 04 2009 at 12:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
Funny how when the shoes on the other foot it's "staged" but when acorn, funded by the US govn, shows up to support Obama it's authentic and a sign of what the people think.

So are you saying Acorn supporters are authentic? I'm not following you here.

Anyway, why not compare it to detractors since that's what these people are? Like, say, Code Pink. I've no problem saying that Code Pink demonstrations are staged. I also think Code Pink is a bunch of dinks in their tactics. Of course, at least they're honest enough to make clear that they're from Code Pink instead of pretending to be unorganized people just filled with zeal.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#64 Aug 04 2009 at 12:35 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
He's talking about staged events in which plants act as though they're spontaneously and independently interrupting town-hall meetings with their outrage. You know, after being coached through it.


I find the irony of thinkprogress.org attempting to generate outrage about this most adorable of all. You know. Given that they are a big money lobbyist paid-for site designed to place ideas and carefully targeted political language into the population while appearing to come from just average people...


Oh no! A guy working for a political activist group wrote a memo suggesting to other groups how to disrupt townhall meetings to raise awareness of their position? That's just horrible how he's using his right of free speech to oppose political policies. We've just got to put a stop to that kind of thing right now!


Lol...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#65REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2009 at 12:51 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophiel,
#66 Aug 04 2009 at 12:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Oh no! A guy working for a political activist group wrote a memo suggesting to other groups how to disrupt townhall meetings to raise awareness of their position? That's just horrible how he's using his right of free speech to oppose political policies. We've just got to put a stop to that kind of thing right now!

When did I say it was horrible or had to be stopped? Working those strawmen pretty hard this afternoon, aren't we?

And the other reports? The busing? The lobbyist ties? Hey, I'm not saying it's wrong but you can agree that this is all orchestrated, can't you?

Of course, look at who I'm asking. You said the accurate headcount for the tea parties was the one compiled by Freepers Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#67 Aug 04 2009 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
What do you think of Obama saying he was pro-single payer system?

Ummm.... somewhere between "Couldn't care less" and "Sounds good to me".

I always said that I was in favor of Clinton's plan in theory during the primaries but thought Obama's was much more likely to pass through Congress. If Obama is combining his dreams of a single-payer system with realpolitik so it passes, why am I supposed to be upset?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#68REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2009 at 1:00 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophiel,
#69 Aug 04 2009 at 1:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
I know you're trying to ignore this

Actually, I was working. Single-payer is your boogeyman, not mine.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#70REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2009 at 1:06 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#71 Aug 04 2009 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
You mean besides the lies? He was pro-single payer plan when speaking to his union buddies but now is against it when trying to sell it to the american people?

I'll need some exact quotes. What I've seen from him is mainly him saying some form of "A single payer system won't work in America." Which is true, hence my saying that Clinton's plan wasn't likely to happen. If he thinks it could be a reality 15-20 years out, I suppose it's possible. But it's not possible now.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#72 Aug 04 2009 at 1:15 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
gbaji wrote:
And?


That I thought it was funny.
#73REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2009 at 1:25 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophiel,
#74 Aug 04 2009 at 1:29 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
Googling drudge is a b*tch I know.

So is reading comprehension. I was asking for quotes from him saying that he was against single-payer systems versus him saying that single-payer wasn't right for America (i.e. wasn't going to happen).
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#75 Aug 04 2009 at 2:01 PM Rating: Default
Jophed,

Quote:
I was asking for quotes from him saying that he was against single-payer systems versus him saying that single-payer wasn't right for America (i.e. wasn't going to happen).


Did you even watch the link? What more evidence do you need?

Now he's got his resident ********* going out there saying people are taking what he's said out of context.

You're taking Obamapoligism to new heights.





Edited, Aug 4th 2009 6:01pm by publiusvarus
#76 Aug 04 2009 at 2:02 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
And the other reports? The busing? The lobbyist ties? Hey, I'm not saying it's wrong but you can agree that this is all orchestrated, can't you?


All? No. And if we're being honest here, can you agree that the Left does this sort of orchestration far far more than the Right does?

Quote:
Of course, look at who I'm asking. You said the accurate headcount for the tea parties was the one compiled by Freepers


As opposed to counts made by people who weren't there? Look. I know you (and others) love to assume that I wander various sites trolling for information which I then use to parrot my/their opinions on this forum, but the honest truth is that I don't visit other sites. I don't read blogs. And this is the only place I actively engage in political discussion of any sort. When I went looking for information, I did a google search and stopped at the first site which had posted numbers for the event. I had no clue who's site it was and what degree of involvement they had in the events themselves.


You discount it because it's an "enemy site" I suppose. I just went looking for numbers and wound up there. Who's expressing bias?


Also, which is it Joph? Is the Right engaged in massive orchestration of events by busing people in and spending big money, or is it unable to gather more than a small number of people for any kind of protest or political event? You kinda can't have it both ways, but you keep on trying...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 101 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (101)