Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Neat!Follow

#1 Jul 21 2009 at 3:51 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32015814/ns/technology_and_science-space/

PASADENA, Calif. - Astronomers say Jupiter has apparently been struck by an object, possibly a comet.

MoarpicsplsNassa, kkthx.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#2 Jul 21 2009 at 4:03 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,229 posts
In before zombie aliens are attacking...
#3 Jul 21 2009 at 4:35 AM Rating: Default
Lol that is really neat.
#4 Jul 21 2009 at 7:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
Definitely neat!
____________________________

#5 Jul 21 2009 at 7:20 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Precursor to 2012 obviously.
#6 Jul 21 2009 at 7:24 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
KTurner wrote:
Precursor to 2012 obviously.


Haha, glad I wasn't the only one to think this!
#7 Jul 21 2009 at 7:46 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
very cool!
#8 Jul 21 2009 at 8:07 AM Rating: Good
**
868 posts
It's a Decepticon scout looking for a new source of Energon.
#9 Jul 21 2009 at 6:25 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
It seems that Jupiter needs to shut his ***** mouth. He got smacked around a few years ago, too.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#10 Jul 21 2009 at 6:55 PM Rating: Good
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
KTurner wrote:
Precursor to 2012 obviously.


Haha, glad I wasn't the only one to think this!


More like 2010.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#11 Jul 21 2009 at 7:14 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Shaowstrike wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
KTurner wrote:
Precursor to 2012 obviously.


Haha, glad I wasn't the only one to think this!


More like 2010.


I loved that movie and book.
#12 Jul 21 2009 at 8:20 PM Rating: Good
Power got knocked out during the news and missed the report on this, but wow that is amazing!
#13 Jul 21 2009 at 8:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
so THATS where it went!

... I'm going to need that back. For science!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#14 Jul 22 2009 at 3:58 AM Rating: Decent
So, an object large enough to create an earth sized crater smashes into Jupiter, going completely unnoticed until after the impact and it's just "neat"? I realize Jupiter is some 400 million miles from Earth and about 11 times its diameter, but shouldn't we be able to detect something this big before it happens? NASA wasn't even remotely aware of the impact until someone who just happened to be spying Jupiter gave them a heads up. Sounds like our NEO search funding needs a boost.
#15 Jul 22 2009 at 4:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Why does Tare hate Jupiter?

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#16 Jul 22 2009 at 4:01 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
it's just "neat"?


It was 7 am, mmmkay?

Sheesh, give an uncaffeinated girl a break.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#17 Jul 22 2009 at 4:02 AM Rating: Decent
Tare wrote:
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
it's just "neat"?


It was 7 am, mmmkay?

Sheesh, give an uncaffeinated girl a break.


Preaching to the choir. I'm up 2 hours earlier than usual today for absolutely no apparent reason. Smiley: bah
#18 Jul 22 2009 at 4:12 AM Rating: Good
Well, if the comet hit Jupiter, it's orbit might very well not come near Earth at any point. We still don't know where all PHOs are, but this probably wasn't one of them.
#19 Jul 22 2009 at 4:15 AM Rating: Good
Kavekk wrote:
Well, if the comet hit Jupiter, it's orbit might very well not come near Earth at any point.


Most comets have an elliptical orbit that could very easily place them in line with Earth in the near future.

Quote:
We still don't know where all PHOs are, but this probably wasn't one of them.


Well, not now.
#20 Jul 22 2009 at 4:31 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Most comets have an elliptical orbit that could very easily place them in line with Earth in the near future.


No, BD, most comets won't be in line with the Earth in the near future.
#21 Jul 22 2009 at 4:57 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,229 posts
Even if they were, Bruce would save us.
#22 Jul 22 2009 at 5:32 AM Rating: Decent
Kavekk wrote:
Quote:
Most comets have an elliptical orbit that could very easily place them in line with Earth in the near future.


No, BD, most comets won't be in line with the Earth in the near future.


That's not what I said, now is it.
#23 Jul 22 2009 at 5:37 AM Rating: Good
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Quote:
Most comets have an elliptical orbit that could very easily place them in line with Earth in the near future.


No, BD, most comets won't be in line with the Earth in the near future.


That's not what I said, now is it.


Well, you said most comets could easily be in line with Earth in the near future, which is to say that the majority of comets have a high probability of being in line with earth in the near futuree. I mean, that's obviously not what you wanted to say, but it's what the words mean.
#24 Jul 22 2009 at 5:58 AM Rating: Decent
Kavekk wrote:
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Quote:
Most comets have an elliptical orbit that could very easily place them in line with Earth in the near future.


No, BD, most comets won't be in line with the Earth in the near future.


That's not what I said, now is it.


Well, you said most comets could easily be in line with Earth in the near future, which is to say that the majority of comets have a high probability of being in line with earth in the near futuree. I mean, that's obviously not what you wanted to say, but it's what the words mean.


Could and have are completely different words. It seems you have a reading comprehension problem, so I drew you a picture.

Screenshot


As I have very plainly illustrated, the statement

Quote:
Well, if the comet hit Jupiter, it's orbit might very well not come near Earth at any point.


is not necessarily true. The same comet could be on an orbit that would intercept earth at some point in the near future. How are we to know if we don't even know it's there?
#25 Jul 22 2009 at 6:09 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Could and have are completely different words.


Yes. And saying that something could easily do something is saying that it has a high probability of doing that thing. Understand?

Quote:
is not necessarily true. The same comet could be on an orbit that would intercept earth at some point in the near future. How are we to know if we don't even know it's there?


Pedantry aside, though, you're wrong anyway. It is not necessarily true that a comet that crosses Jupiter's orbit won't hit Earth - but that's not what I said. "might very well not" is also a statement about probability. I'm not saying it couldn't come close to Earth, I'm saying it's unlikely - that most comets that pass through Jupiter's orbit do not pass close to the Earth.

I like the diagram, though.

Edited, Jul 22nd 2009 2:09pm by Kavekk
#26 Jul 22 2009 at 6:12 AM Rating: Decent
Kavekk wrote:
Quote:
Could and have are completely different words.


Yes. And saying that something could easily do something is saying that it has a high probability of doing that thing. Understand?


Absolutely incorrect.

Quote:
You could easily get hit by a car next time you walk along the street. Therefore, it has a high probability of happening.


See how that statement is false?
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 58 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (58)