Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I saw a darkie breaking into the house across the street...Follow

#202 Jul 26 2009 at 6:14 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Goggy wrote:
And that's the logic your using. My argument is that if one of the first facts that officer thinks to write about his experience of entering the house is that he saw a 'black man' could suggest that he is predisposed to think of him as a 'black man' not just a 'man', and this is not just my opinion. There are many articles about our perceptions of races and people, and one of the underlying suggestions for ridding the world of racism is that we stop looking at people as different, in our immediate thought, but look at them as just people.


Even if the officer thought that Gate's ethnicity was the most important descriptor he could use, that doesn't make him racist. Skin and hair colour are probably the two most noticeable things about a person, and merely noting them down doesn't mean you're disparaging the person who possesses them. If I say "John has red hair", I'm probably saying that because less than 1% of the population has red hair and it's pretty damn noticeable if anyone wanted to find John. I'm not saying that gingers are less than human.

Quote:
I understand what you are saying about the statistic example I gave, but I also refer you to my previous paragraph and can see why people object to this focus on individual groups, it does nothing to beat racism in a country if people hear the highest ranking police officer in the country say that most crime is committed by black people.


If the solution is colour blindness, then getting worked up over the results of some statistical data is equally detrimental. Those people aren't opposed to the commissioner's statement because he said "the majority of muggings are carried out by [insert ethnicity]". They're opposed because the ethnicity is black people. They are specifically drawn to that statement because it connects black people and crime in a way they assumed was racist. If he said that statistical data showed that the majority of muggings were committed by white people, or redheads, or rugby players, or people over 40 or any other subset you care to name, would it still be considered discriminatory?
#203 Jul 26 2009 at 7:10 AM Rating: Default
***
3,229 posts
Well without going around in circles much more, I'm merely saying it could be.
#204 Jul 26 2009 at 8:13 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,087 posts
Quote:
If the solution is colour blindness, then getting worked up over the results of some statistical data is equally detrimental


QFT

Talking about how it makes people feel is important, but not at the expense of truth.

There is a normal identification & defensiveness in any minority community, a good example is the Italian Americans and how theyve dealt with the Mafia & its constant portrayal & glorification in the Media.

In fact, there are so many paralells to the Black experience its astonishing.

While millions of hard working Italian americans struggled to find a place in "The New World" thru hard work, family values, & strong religious influence,they daily confronted the Al Capone, John Gotti images.

The same can be said of the Chinese, Irish, etc etc....

I can tell you my grandfather felt very differently about the JFK assasination than I did, as he personally identified with him as an Irish Catholic.

I feel no defensiveness when I see a white person arrested on a show like "Cops", but Black friends have told me they feel an almost reflexive, visceral reaction to the same show.

Hopefully, Obama will have a beer with these guys & Gates will admit he was being an asshat...& Crowley feels bad about what happened (even though he felt he had no choice, thus no "Apology for having done his job")

Statistics can lie but facts are facts & we have more important problems to deal with than this fiasco.

Its an interesting choice to use a red-head as an example...due to the fact they are almost universally targeted for abuse in K-12 schools in this country.

Just like polio victims (gimp) & people with cleft palattes ("Hare-lip") were in years gone by
(the first derogatives I remember learning as a child are: "Red on the head like... & the ubiquitous "Red-headed step child")

#205 Jul 26 2009 at 3:14 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
I don't think it should be considered racist to describe people by their race. But someone earlier in the thread (varus, probably) said that had it been Palin in question, she would have been thrown in jail. That's clearly false. Had it been Palin, the passerby would have likely walked up and offered help getting into her house. The only reason the cops were called is because a black man was suspicious in the eyes of the passerby. The whole thing started because of a subconscious racist thought.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#206 Jul 26 2009 at 3:18 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,701 posts
TirithRR wrote:
The only reason the cops were called is because a black man was suspicious in the eyes of the passerby.




Where did the passerby say that they wouldn't have called the cops if they thought a white guy was breaking in?
____________________________
If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find someone that life has given vodka and have party.


This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
#207 Jul 26 2009 at 3:23 PM Rating: Default
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
KingJohn wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
The only reason the cops were called is because a black man was suspicious in the eyes of the passerby.




Where did the passerby say that they wouldn't have called the cops if they thought a white guy was breaking in?



Where did the passerby say that the sky was blue?


Just because they didn't say something directly, doesn't make it any less likely to be true.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#208 Jul 26 2009 at 3:35 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,701 posts
So because they didn't say that they wouldn't, it's correct to assume that they wouldn't?
____________________________
If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find someone that life has given vodka and have party.


This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
#209 Jul 26 2009 at 3:40 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
KingJohn wrote:
So because they didn't say that they wouldn't, it's correct to assume that they wouldn't?


You misunderstand me.

Just because they didn't say that they wouldn't, doesn't make it any less likely that they wouldn't.

You honestly think this woman would have called the cops if they saw a 45 year old, fairly attractive, white woman trying to open a jammed door to a house? There's a chance they would have, but just because she didn't specifically say that she wouldn't have called, doesn't make it any less likely that she wouldn't have called.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#210 Jul 26 2009 at 5:05 PM Rating: Excellent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
Assuming fails. Stop doing it.
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#211 Jul 26 2009 at 7:26 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
TirithRR wrote:
You honestly think this woman would have called the cops if they saw a 45 year old, fairly attractive, white woman trying to open a jammed door to a house? There's a chance they would have, but just because she didn't specifically say that she wouldn't have called, doesn't make it any less likely that she wouldn't have called.


Do you know their exact vantage point? The details they saw? If they would have been able to see that other woman as clearly? That they wouldn't have called the cops on a young white male - maybe this is sexism instead of racism?

No?

Ok.
#212 Jul 26 2009 at 8:52 PM Rating: Decent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
CBD wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
You honestly think this woman would have called the cops if they saw a 45 year old, fairly attractive, white woman trying to open a jammed door to a house? There's a chance they would have, but just because she didn't specifically say that she wouldn't have called, doesn't make it any less likely that she wouldn't have called.


Do you know their exact vantage point? The details they saw? If they would have been able to see that other woman as clearly? That they wouldn't have called the cops on a young white male - maybe this is sexism instead of racism?

No?

Ok.


Smiley: rolleyes ***** please, stop pretending that cultural biases against black men don't exist and have an adverse affect on them in society. I'm just waiting for Pensive now to swoop in for some emergency pedantry.

Edited, Jul 27th 2009 1:12am by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#213 Jul 26 2009 at 9:59 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
You honestly think this woman would have called the cops if they saw a 45 year old, fairly attractive, white woman trying to open a jammed door to a house?


What's that got to do with Sarah Palin?

badum pish

Quote:
I'm just waiting for Pensive now to swoop in for some emergency pedantry.


Against whom, or to what end? I'm thinking about about six ways that this could be interpreted.

Also, I wouldn't want to excoriate you for not reading my blatant repudiation of the admission that the opposite assumption of the one which I was previously attacking was not itself also worthy of attacking, both as an ideal and actuality within the thread, without first clarifying as to whether you had, in fact, read the repudiation and were introducing my pedantery into some other context than before.

Edited, Jul 27th 2009 2:02am by Pensive
#214 Jul 26 2009 at 9:59 PM Rating: Good
****
4,512 posts
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Smiley: rolleyes ***** please, stop pretending that cultural biases against black men don't exist and have an adverse affect on them in society. I'm just waiting for Pensive now to swoop in for some emergency pedantry.


Stop reading into things to prove your own pathetic point about how absolutely awful all whiteys must treat black people. You have absolutely zero proof other than "WELL OF COURSE IT'S BECAUSE HE'S BLACK SHE WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE IT OTHERWISE. I'm psychic, so I know! :D"

If you look for racism, sexism, homophobia, you name it, you sure as fuck are going to find it everywhere.
#215 Jul 26 2009 at 10:15 PM Rating: Good
CBD wrote:
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Smiley: rolleyes ***** please, stop pretending that cultural biases against black men don't exist and have an adverse affect on them in society. I'm just waiting for Pensive now to swoop in for some emergency pedantry.


Stop reading into things to prove your own pathetic point about how absolutely awful all whiteys must treat black people. You have absolutely zero proof other than "WELL OF COURSE IT'S BECAUSE HE'S BLACK SHE WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE IT OTHERWISE. I'm psychic, so I know! :D"

If you look for racism, sexism, homophobia, you name it, you sure as fuck are going to find it everywhere.


Anna is an expert on what black men in America experience on a daily basis. Her anecdotal and limited work experience makes it so.
#216 Jul 27 2009 at 2:40 AM Rating: Good
BD wrote:
Her anecdotal and limited work experience makes it so.


You'd have a point, if she wasn't as old as she is. Except for all things ****, I'd expect her to be pretty god-damned experienced.

Listen, we can keep going around in circles, but the truth of the matter anyone would have been pissed at a cop lingering around their home after establishing that they were the owner & not breaking in. The fact that he arrested a prominent black scholar, outside of his own home after establishing the fact that he was the owner & not breaking in, made it a race issue (even if the officer is not racist, which is how things seem to appear).

It was a **** move on the cop to arrest him for disorderly, even though Gates was being a ****.

As much as even I would like, cops just can't go around arresting all the ****** (There's a Nixnot joke in there somewhere, I know it).
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#217 Jul 27 2009 at 5:26 AM Rating: Decent
poodle,

Quote:
Seriously. I don't know how you mistake a college professor - who is your neighbour! - for a burglar without being painfully stupid.


They're yankees.


Anna,

Quote:
Gates is famous, Ugly and especially famous among Harvard affiliated peoples.


We know he kept screaming madly "Don't you know who I am!"


Can anyone explain why the disorderly conduct charge was dropped? According to all accounts this professor of black history was being disorderly and creating a public nuisance.



#218 Jul 27 2009 at 5:37 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,087 posts
Fairly common, similar to arresting a sympathetic figure at a media/protest event for "Unlawful Assembly" or "Obstructing Traffic" etc.
say, like a 75 year old grandmother in a wheelchair

Then releasing her later with no charges filed. Cops can use it to gain control of the situation without any permanent consequences.

Coincidently, also avoids creating "Martyrs" for the cause lol.

Also, officially, police arrest & District Atty. decides who to file charges on.
#219 Jul 27 2009 at 5:37 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:

Can anyone explain why the disorderly conduct charge was dropped? According to all accounts this professor of black history was being disorderly and creating a public nuisance.

Who was he bugging?





Edited, Jul 27th 2009 3:48pm by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#220 Jul 27 2009 at 5:41 AM Rating: Decent
Omegavegeta wrote:
BD wrote:
Her anecdotal and limited work experience makes it so.


You'd have a point, if she wasn't as old as she is. Except for all things ****, I'd expect her to be pretty god-damned experienced.


Except, you know, the whole being black thing. Also, being a male.

I don't want to turn this into an Anna bashing, but whenever I see her "take up the cause" for other people, I tend to ignore it. She's like the little boy who cried wolf on everyone else's behalf.
#221 Jul 27 2009 at 5:42 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
The Great BrownDuck wrote:
CBD wrote:
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Smiley: rolleyes ***** please, stop pretending that cultural biases against black men don't exist and have an adverse affect on them in society. I'm just waiting for Pensive now to swoop in for some emergency pedantry.


Stop reading into things to prove your own pathetic point about how absolutely awful all whiteys must treat black people. You have absolutely zero proof other than "WELL OF COURSE IT'S BECAUSE HE'S BLACK SHE WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE IT OTHERWISE. I'm psychic, so I know! :D"

If you look for racism, sexism, homophobia, you name it, you sure as fuck are going to find it everywhere.


Anna is an expert on what black men in America experience on a daily basis. Her anecdotal and limited work experience makes it so.


Kind of like how Brownduck claims that when he makes watermelon jokes about black people, they aren't racist because he has so much real life experience. Also, we both know that despite our similar socioeconomic backgrounds, I've accomplished more in my career--and I had by the time I was your age, so I'm not sure why you are talking about my work experience.

Edited, Jul 27th 2009 9:52am by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#222 Jul 27 2009 at 5:44 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
CBD wrote:
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Smiley: rolleyes ***** please, stop pretending that cultural biases against black men don't exist and have an adverse affect on them in society. I'm just waiting for Pensive now to swoop in for some emergency pedantry.


Stop reading into things to prove your own pathetic point about how absolutely awful all whiteys must treat black people. You have absolutely zero proof other than "WELL OF COURSE IT'S BECAUSE HE'S BLACK SHE WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE IT OTHERWISE. I'm psychic, so I know! :D"

If you look for racism, sexism, homophobia, you name it, you sure as fuck are going to find it everywhere.


Really? And this is the incident where you aren't gonna find it? This is people here denying certain realities that some people face. It's part of white privilege.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#223 Jul 27 2009 at 5:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
CBD wrote:
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Smiley: rolleyes ***** please, stop pretending that cultural biases against black men don't exist and have an adverse affect on them in society. I'm just waiting for Pensive now to swoop in for some emergency pedantry.


Stop reading into things to prove your own pathetic point about how absolutely awful all whiteys must treat black people. You have absolutely zero proof other than "WELL OF COURSE IT'S BECAUSE HE'S BLACK SHE WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE IT OTHERWISE. I'm psychic, so I know! :D"

If you look for racism, sexism, homophobia, you name it, you sure as fuck are going to find it everywhere.


Really? And this is the incident where you aren't gonna find it? This is people here denying certain realities that some people face. It's part of white privilege.
Hello, AnnabellaOnAlexanderAnnabella, Goblin in Disguise, I am a white male between the ages of 18 and 30 who has never engaged in any serious study of human society or race relations. Please allow me to express my uninformed opinion on a subject about which I know nothing. Having no insight in to the minority experience, I feel confident in informing you that white privilege is a myth. I learned this by watching the Colbert Report; the host of this show routinely does bits referencing and lampooning white privilege which I laugh at despite not really having a clue what's going on. I'm pretty much a giant tool.

Thanks for your time.
#224 Jul 27 2009 at 5:57 AM Rating: Good
I guess it's true what they say. You don't have to be posh to be privileged, you just have to be white.
#225 Jul 27 2009 at 5:58 AM Rating: Decent
You don't need to be a black male to talk about racism. Anyone who has studied the US legal system (or the European one, for that matter) for any length of time will know that those systems are institutionally racist. Not always, and not against every black/asian guy, of course. But on the whole, they are. Some of it is willfull, some isn't, but there are some stats that you fundamentally can't argue with.

I'm not saying that these prove that the officers were racists or not, just that it's possible to have an informed opinion on the subject if you actually work in those fields, regardless of your ethnicity/gender/religion/sexual orientation.

My personal opinion is that it's impossible to prove that the officers were racists. But it's blindingly obvious they were assholes. Is that better or worse? I don't know, but none of this would've occured had they shown an ounce of common sense, or respect. I would bet that the person who made the call was in part prompted by racial stereotypes. Had the perpetrator been a white female, the caller probably would not have been so quick to call the cops. Though it's impossible to be sure, obviosuly. And finally, Gates did have a bit of a chip on his shoulder, but considering his background and the circumstances of the arrest, it's neither surprising nor blameworthy.

The only downside is that Gates was not a homosexual who opened fire on the cops while his same-sex partner was having an abortion at the local state-funded hospital. Cos that would've been a proper debate.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#226 Jul 27 2009 at 6:01 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Mindel wrote:
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
CBD wrote:
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Smiley: rolleyes ***** please, stop pretending that cultural biases against black men don't exist and have an adverse affect on them in society. I'm just waiting for Pensive now to swoop in for some emergency pedantry.


Stop reading into things to prove your own pathetic point about how absolutely awful all whiteys must treat black people. You have absolutely zero proof other than "WELL OF COURSE IT'S BECAUSE HE'S BLACK SHE WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE IT OTHERWISE. I'm psychic, so I know! :D"

If you look for racism, sexism, homophobia, you name it, you sure as fuck are going to find it everywhere.


Really? And this is the incident where you aren't gonna find it? This is people here denying certain realities that some people face. It's part of white privilege.
Hello, AnnabellaOnAlexanderAnnabella, Goblin in Disguise, I am a white male between the ages of 18 and 30 who has never engaged in any serious study of human society or race relations. Please allow me to express my uninformed opinion on a subject about which I know nothing. Having no insight in to the minority experience, I feel confident in informing you that white privilege is a myth. I learned this by watching the Colbert Report; the host of this show routinely does bits referencing and lampooning white privilege which I laugh at despite not really having a clue what's going on. I'm pretty much a giant tool.

Thanks for your time.


I....I...see the light! Thank you, white male!
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 228 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (228)