Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I saw a darkie breaking into the house across the street...Follow

#277 Jul 27 2009 at 2:36 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Oh, so you haven't been there. Nice try, Sweetie. You have no context. Again, I work in the Cambridge Court Clinic. I'm a little clued in on trends in the area. Also, about the police force.


I am not talking about the behavior of the police force.

We were not talking about the behavior of the police force when I first replied to this thread.

My first reply to this thread was not about the behavior of the police force.

This continued discussion was not about the behavior of the police force but rather about the potential racism on the part of the woman who made the original call.

The same woman who couldn't even tell what the race of the men was from her vantage point and only saw the suspicious behavior, as that last article states near the bottom.

You're not usually this stupid. What's going on?

Edited, Jul 27th 2009 6:38pm by CBD
#278Annabella, Posted: Jul 27 2009 at 2:40 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You're being an idiot. I have worked in this town for eight years, CBD, in the justice system, where I have witness dozens of incidents of racial targeting, including incidents not dissimilar from this one. I know what it's like. Don't give me stupid internet **** as a defense, okay. You don't have to agree with me but Jesus Christ, stop acting like your special internet research means jack **** for me or reveals anything that you don't think I would know.
#279 Jul 27 2009 at 2:51 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
You're being an idiot. I have worked in this town for eight years, CBD, in the justice system, where I have witness dozens of incidents of racial targeting, including incidents not dissimilar from this one. I know what it's like. Don't give me stupid internet sh*t as a defense, okay. You don't have to agree with me but Jesus Christ, stop acting like your special internet research means jack sh*t for me or reveals anything that you don't think I would know.


It's not even that I disagree with you, it's that you're flat out wrong. I said it was ridiculous to assume the woman made the call simply because she saw two black men, and you responded by twisting it around to the justice system and the actual police force and their racism. That has nothing to do with the woman who made the call. You know, the topic of conversation?

I'm happy that you work so damn hard for the people who truly do need it, but that has absolutely nothing to do with a woman calling the cops after seeing suspicious behavior, especially given the mere fact (not opinion, fact) that she never made any racial claims in the 911 call and apparently could not even accurately discern their race from her vantage point.

The best part about all this is that you feel your past experiences give you some ultimatum to decide exactly what motivated this woman. Guess what? You don't know her past. You don't know her family history. You don't know how she was raised. You don't know her friends. You don't know her opinions. You don't know her beliefs. You don't know her job. You don't know what her family does for a living. You're just happily assuming that she must be racist, simply because racism does exist. That's ******** and you damn well know it.
#280 Jul 27 2009 at 2:54 PM Rating: Default
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Yes it does, because as you might have read, I am also talking about targeting POC in general, including when passerbys report to the police. You might think it's ridiculous but it happens all the time. You should realize in a racialized society like ours, where discrimination runs through the system and through society, that these accusations disproportionately affect POC. You don't see it through that lens because white privilege means that you don't have to think about how race affects you. You don't have to think about context because this isn't your community.

I wonder about you and your eagerness to maintain that she wasn't motivated by racism. Why is it so important to you? Why is that what resonates for you and why does that speak to you?

I'm sorry. If Gates were an old white guy at 12:44 on Ware Street, no one would have called the cops. You can feel free to believe differently.



Edited, Jul 27th 2009 7:00pm by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#281 Jul 27 2009 at 3:15 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

It's not even that I disagree with you, it's that you're flat out wrong. I said it was ridiculous to assume the woman made the call simply because she saw two black men, and you responded by twisting it around to the justice system and the actual police force and their racism. That has nothing to do with the woman who made the call. You know, the topic of conversation?


That's not the topic of the conversation you simpering fucking ignorant moron.


I'm happy that you work so damn hard for the people who truly do need it, but that has absolutely nothing to do with a woman calling the cops after seeing suspicious behavior, especially given the mere fact (not opinion, fact) that she never made any racial claims in the 911 call and apparently could not even accurately discern their race from her vantage point.


Who gives a fuck? Do police go blind when a 911 caller doesn't mention color? I was unaware of this phenomenon. It sounds fascinating, however. You're clearly obsessed with it. Explain to me how it is that the fact that the woman who called 911 and spoke to a dispatcher who then spoke to someone else who then sent police to the scene caused the arriving officers to be unable to come to the conclusion that the people they encountered there were, in fact, black. Does this magical optical happening have a name? Nubian Glaucoma, perhaps?


The best part about all this is that you feel your past experiences give you some ultimatum to decide exactly what motivated this woman.


It doesn't. What her years of training and clinical experience do, however, is give her about a 1000000000000 times better chance of understanding the psychosocial dynamics in play here and how they impacted each of the actors. Barring the sudden onset of psychic powers, NO ONE EVER will know what the woman thought other than her. Your fucking guess is based on nothing and is as likely as her secretly hating Gates and thinking "I'm a gonna get that damn nigger, muhahahahahhahah, I like cheese." Anna, at least, has substantially better odds as guessing more accurately.


Guess what? You don't know her past. You don't know her family history. You don't know how she was raised. You don't know her friends. You don't know her opinions. You don't know her beliefs. You don't know her job. You don't know what her family does for a living. You're just happily assuming that she must be racist, simply because racism does exist. That's bullsh*t and you damn well know it.


No, it isn't. It's how humanity can possibly function at all. This ludicrous conceit that without absolute certainty, all probabilities are equal must end. Stop being such a gigantic fucking sucker. You don't know as much about this as someone who spend a decade studying it. You don't know as much about this as someone who's worked in the system. Your opinion is not equal to Annas. It may be right, but in terms of a value proposition or adding anything to this discussion it's *entirely worthless*. Understand?

I live about a block away from where this occurred. I lost my house keys for an entire summer once and, in plain sight, went through a first floor window probably 15 times before I bothered replacing the lock. No one ever made a comment. I'm white. Meaningful? Not at all, it's a worthless anecdote. Sort of like everything you've posted on this thread.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#282 Jul 27 2009 at 3:26 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
I wonder about you and your eagerness to maintain that she wasn't motivated by racism. Why is it so important to you? Why is that what resonates for you and why does that speak to you?


Because I flat out refuse to ever make or allow such severe, baseless assumptions about a person. I find the behavior of the arresting officer in this situation to be disgusting and intolerable. I find it equally disgusting and intolerable that people should demand that this woman is racist, particularly given the amount of evidence that shows she wasn't, simply because she made the call that led to the arrest.

Annabella wrote:
If Gates were an old white guy at 12:44 on Ware Street, no one would have called the cops. You can feel free to believe differently.


Again, she could not discern their race from where she was. She never mentioned race when she called 911. When pressured to give more description, she said one of the men might be Hispanic - racist but certainly not supportive of your claim she called because Gates is black.

Gates didn't just have a bit of trouble opening his door. They had to break the already jimmied lock to get into the house. If I saw that and didn't live in the neighborhood, much like the woman, I would have called the cops. I don't care what their race is. I don't care what the history of the neighborhood is. I don't care about the history of the judicial system. I don't care about racial statistics. You have no evidence to support that this woman is any different other than you simply want her to be because that's what you've experienced.

Call me naive, but I will never reach a point where I generalize everyone as racist, sexist, what have you simply because I see a lot of that on a day-to-day basis. To me that's just as bad as the original racism.
#283 Jul 27 2009 at 3:33 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Call me naive


You're naive. PAINFULLY naive.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#284 Jul 27 2009 at 3:36 PM Rating: Good
****
4,512 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
That's not the topic of the conversation you simpering fucking ignorant moron.


Strange, because I'm pretty sure I was talking about that woman. I'm pretty sure I replied to someone talking about that woman. I'm pretty sure my reply... related to that woman.

I don't give a sh*t about the system or the police and would never try to claim they aren't corrupt and full of racist pigs who have no clue what the hell they're doing. I'm talking solely about baseless accusations against a woman who isn't even part of the system and merely made a call because she thought she saw two men breaking into a house.

Smasharoo wrote:
Anna, at least, has substantially better odds as guessing more accurately.


Because of the substantial research Anna has read on racism in forty year old women of Portuguese descent working in Cambridge.

Smasharoo wrote:
You're naive. PAINFULLY naive.


I'm genuinely curious how so.

If I was black and had an opportunity to escape slavery through the Underground Railroad, I wouldn't pass it up simply because the majority of white people around me hated black people at the time and would kill me for attempting escape. I'd be naive for assuming it was safe. I'd be naive for assuming that there wasn't the possibility of someone actually turning slaves in further down the line and disguising it as being caught. I'd be naive for assuming that everyone who knows the people that helped slaves escape were also abolitionists. I don't see how it's naive to assume that the people running it were automatically bad simply because the majority of southern white people were royal douchebags.

Edited, Jul 27th 2009 7:41pm by CBD
#285 Jul 27 2009 at 3:37 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Because of the substantial research Anna has read on racism in forty year old women of Portuguese descent working in Cambridge.


What do you do for a living?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#286 Jul 27 2009 at 3:41 PM Rating: Decent
Smasharoo wrote:

I'm happy that you work so damn hard for the people who truly do need it, but that has absolutely nothing to do with a woman calling the cops after seeing suspicious behavior, especially given the mere fact (not opinion, fact) that she never made any racial claims in the 911 call and apparently could not even accurately discern their race from her vantage point.


Who gives a fuck? Do police go blind when a 911 caller doesn't mention color? I was unaware of this phenomenon. It sounds fascinating, however. You're clearly obsessed with it. Explain to me how it is that the fact that the woman who called 911 and spoke to a dispatcher who then spoke to someone else who then sent police to the scene caused the arriving officers to be unable to come to the conclusion that the people they encountered there were, in fact, black. Does this magical optical happening have a name? Nubian Glaucoma, perhaps?


Link to the 911 call:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/07/27/911_tape_reveals_caller_did_not_bring_up_race_of_gates.html

Anna wrote:
I'm sorry. If Gates were an old white guy at 12:44 on Ware Street, no one would have called the cops. You can feel free to believe differently.


I neither know about nor care about the remainder of the argument, but this statement is flat out bullsh*t. The 911 operator explicitly asked the woman if the men were "white, black, or hispanic" and the woman flatly declared she did not know, that one of the men looked possibly hispanic but she didn't have a good view and that she couldn't even guess the race of the other. In fact, the woman made an extra effort to declare that she saw two suit cases and that she was unable to tell if they had a key and perhaps the door was stuck. She purposely avoided presuming any intent on the part of the men, despite the 911 operator trying to get her to say she thought she witnessed a break-in (listen to the f'in tape, ffs).

The woman placed a 911 call because someone else brought her attention to the matter ("an older woman") and she saw something that might be suspicious and clearly believes in "better safe than sorry". It is my belief after hearing the call that the woman meant absolutely no harm in placing the call, nor did she make any snap judgments about the men she was calling to report. Anna's implication that an old white guy would not have garnered the same phone call is absolutely incorrect, in this case, because it is perfectly clear that race had nothing to do with the woman's decision to make the call.


The 911 operator on the other hand is a complete douche bag.

Edited, Jul 27th 2009 6:42pm by BrownDuck
#287 Jul 27 2009 at 3:44 PM Rating: Default
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Brownduck is also naive.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#288 Jul 27 2009 at 3:44 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Link to the 911 call:


Why on Earth would you link this in response to what I posted. I know you have difficulty reading, but: wow.

The woman placed a 911 call because someone else brought her attention to the matter ("an older woman") and she saw something that might be suspicious and clearly believes in "better safe than sorry". It is my belief after hearing the call that the woman meant absolutely no harm in placing the call, nor did she make any snap judgments about the men she was calling to report. Anna's implication that an old white guy would not have garnered the same phone call is absolutely incorrect

Do you see the problem, here, logician? Let me know if you need help.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#289 Jul 27 2009 at 3:46 PM Rating: Good
****
4,512 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Because of the substantial research Anna has read on racism in forty year old women of Portuguese descent working in Cambridge.

What do you do for a living?


Nothing. I'm a college student which automatically means I'm a moron and will have no clue what I'm talking about. Anna's extensive experience in psychology and dealing with the Boston, MA area judicial system mean that she has the full right and power to dictate the thoughts and beliefs of the majority of the people in the area, or at least throw blind guesses at it far better than I can simply based on research she's read.

I think I covered all that for you?


#290 Jul 27 2009 at 3:48 PM Rating: Decent
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Brownduck is also naive.


No, you simply have issues with racism and refuse to believe the possibility that the woman's 911 call had absolutely nothing to do with race.
#291 Jul 27 2009 at 3:48 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Nothing. I'm a college student


Studying what? Why is this so hard for you, it's not a complicated question. Is it that you've at least the cunning of an eleven year old and can see the end result already?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#292 Jul 27 2009 at 3:49 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

No, you simply have issues with racism and refuse to believe the possibility that the woman's 911 call had absolutely nothing to do with race.


Still can't see the problem, huh? I find it extremely difficult to believe anyone could possibly be that stupid. Even you.



____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#293 Jul 27 2009 at 3:51 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Man, nobody wants to try to get along and share Smiley: frown
#294 Jul 27 2009 at 3:51 PM Rating: Decent
Smasharoo wrote:

Link to the 911 call:


Why on Earth would you link this in response to what I posted. I know you have difficulty reading, but: wow.


CBD made an argument that the race played no part in the woman's decision to call 911. Anna disputed that despite evidence to the contrary. You laid into CBD. You are incorrect, and so is Anna. My response is an illustration of this fact. I know you think you're @#%^ing super intelligent, but you're being a fool in this case.

Quote:
The woman placed a 911 call because someone else brought her attention to the matter ("an older woman") and she saw something that might be suspicious and clearly believes in "better safe than sorry". It is my belief after hearing the call that the woman meant absolutely no harm in placing the call, nor did she make any snap judgments about the men she was calling to report. Anna's implication that an old white guy would not have garnered the same phone call is absolutely incorrect
Do you see the problem, here, logician? Let me know if you need help.


There is no problem with my statement. Maybe your comprehension of it is flawed.

Edited, Jul 27th 2009 6:51pm by BrownDuck
#295 Jul 27 2009 at 3:55 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

There is no problem with my statement. Maybe your comprehension of it is flawed.


The women who made the 911 call is not the person who was suspicious at seeing the event.

Hence:

Her state of mind, what she said, etc. has absolutely nothing to do with if the woman who brought it to HER attention was informed by race.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#296 Jul 27 2009 at 3:56 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
Nothing. I'm a college student which automatically means I'm a moron and will have no clue what I'm talking about.


Being a student doesn't make your opinions worthless, but it does limit the factual observations that you can make credibly, without relying on potentially unreliable research, and also limits meta-observations to hypothetical analysis, which often can't be applied directly to reality. It doesn't mean you can't have an opinion; what it means is that you should listen, especially to someone with lots of painfully relevant experience.

Finding the balance between ad hominem and ad populum is difficult.
#297 Jul 27 2009 at 3:58 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
None of those things are mutually exclusive with racism.


I'll stop you right there. I wasn't saying that it's impossible to be an inept racist asshat. I was saying that this was the result of ineptitude and asshattery and not racism. If you see a guy who's been stabbed to death, you can safely say he was stabbed and not shot without having said that it's impossible to be stabbed and shot simultaneously, or that stabbing and shooting are mutually exclusive. What I've done is look at the situation (stabbed corpse) and determined a cause. I'm not an expert or anything other than a mildly interested internet guy, but this situation looks like two people being asshats, not two people being racist asshats. Without oversimplifying it too much, this seems like a purely normal case of natural human asshattery.

I've forgotten what either of us was talking about. Thanks, Superpedant.

Edited, Jul 28th 2009 12:02am by zepoodle
#298 Jul 27 2009 at 4:00 PM Rating: Decent
Smasharoo wrote:

There is no problem with my statement. Maybe your comprehension of it is flawed.


The women who made the 911 call is not the person who was suspicious at seeing the event.

Hence:

Her state of mind, what she said, etc. has absolutely nothing to do with if the woman who brought it to HER attention was informed by race.


The argument I was addressing can be broken down as "the reason the 911 call was placed". The 911 caller's attention was drawn to an event by someone else (for WHATEVER reason, race perhaps, but that is irrelevant). The caller then proceeded to observe the situation and using her own judgment (not that of the person who drew her attention to the event in the first place) decided to place a call.

We can debate whether the caller herself would have noticed the event were it not for the old lady, and if we assume she would never have noticed, then we can imply an indirect relationship between racism and the 911 call, but to do so is over-analyzing the situation. The simple fact of the matter is that the caller herself knew nothing about the race of the men when she placed the call. She knew only that at least two men were present and that they had gained some measure of forceful entry into the residence.


"The simplest explanation is usually the correct one."



Edited, Jul 27th 2009 7:00pm by BrownDuck

Edited, Jul 27th 2009 7:01pm by BrownDuck
#299 Jul 27 2009 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Studying what? Why is this so hard for you, it's not a complicated question. Is it that you've at least the cunning of an eleven year old and can see the end result already?


Math and statistics. I didn't quite see the point in answering a question you never asked. Would you like me to now speculate on (a lack of) future job opportunities?

Smasharoo wrote:
Her state of mind, what she said, etc. has absolutely nothing to do with if the woman who brought it to HER attention was informed by race.


Great, so now we've settled that there is essentially no evidence that the woman who actually made the call (the one woman we were talking about) did so because of racist thoughts when she saw two mean, scary black men breaking into the house.

I'm glad we figured that out as a team.

Edited, Jul 27th 2009 8:06pm by CBD
#300 Jul 27 2009 at 4:06 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

We can debate whether the caller herself would have noticed the event were it not for the old lady, and if we assume she would never have noticed, then we can imply an indirect relationship between racism and the 911 call, but to do so is over-analyzing the situation. The simple fact of the matter is that the caller herself knew nothing about the race of the men when she placed the call. She knew only that at least two men were present and that they had gained some measure of forceful entry into the residence.


We don't need to debate it. Your statement "Anna's implication that an old white guy would not have garnered the same phone call is absolutely incorrect" is false.

It's not an arguable position, it's pretty much the definition of false. You even conveniently used the term "absolutely", setting aside all pretense of rhetorical qualification.

Do you see, or shall I map it out for you symbolically?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#301 Jul 27 2009 at 4:06 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
I've forgotten what I was talking about. Thanks, Superpedant.


Well you should have read the rest then. It wasn't pedantic at all and actually quite non-logical and almost emotional.

Quote:
I'm not an expert or anything other than a mildly interested internet guy, but this situation looks like two people being asshats, not two people being racist asshats.


No one is qualified to really judge the specific situation, much less we, the internet.

Look, the point is that it's not a good idea to be dismissive of the problem because we can conjure up an idea of colourblindness. It's also not a good idea to be angry and all vindictive about it, but rather to get people to examine their own perceptions of other people and question their own subconscious motivations.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 181 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (181)