Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Okay, I'm juvenileFollow

#1 Jul 01 2009 at 8:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
And there's nothing particularly funny about the Army deciding it can do without Arabic translators these days because they're gay.

But I have to admit I laughed hard at this part:

teh article wrote:
For now, Diehl said Choi, who was a grand marshal in Sunday's Gay Pride Parade in San Francisco, will "continue drilling" with his.... unit.


Smiley: facepalm

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#2 Jul 01 2009 at 8:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Drill, baby, drill!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Jul 01 2009 at 10:13 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Is that Cloris Leechman in that picture?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#4 Jul 01 2009 at 10:34 AM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
Smiley: lol
#5 Jul 01 2009 at 11:22 AM Rating: Decent
Elinda wrote:
Is that Cloris Leechman in that picture?


The caption, when you click the picture wrote:
Lt. Dan Choi and actress Cloris Leachman take part in Sunday's Gay Pride Parade in San Francisco. (David Paul Morris / Getty Images)


Wasn't sure if you were asking honestly or honestly asking.
#6 Jul 01 2009 at 12:30 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

How very 1950's.

I know the policy still existed, but I'm kinda surprised they'd enforce it in such a high-publicity case as this.

#7 Jul 01 2009 at 12:35 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Beautiful!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#8 Jul 01 2009 at 1:33 PM Rating: Default
trickybeck wrote:

How very 1950's.

I know the policy still existed, but I'm kinda surprised they'd enforce it in such a high-publicity case as this.



Doesn't surprise me. You have no idea how much homophobia is still a very big and real part of our military. It irritates me and disappoints me that it's allowed to so openly breed within the ranks. Gays and Lesbians should not fear for their personal well being and career because of their sexual orientation. Safety is a bigger issue than I think any of you would like top believe when it comes to doing away with the "Don't ask, Don't Tell" policy.

Is the policy unfair? Yes. I can whole heartedly agree that the intolerant attitude the military shows is wrong, but knowing what I do know about the military and having had this argument with MANY enlisted and officers of our military I have to say that I'm honestly afraid for the well being of these men and women if they come out openly. It's one thing to suspect or possibly know with out being told, so many of these neanderthals can lie to themselves about their coworkers orientation even after being faced with the truth but to be told point blank would be another matter. Sadly.
#9 Jul 01 2009 at 2:52 PM Rating: Good
***
1,701 posts
Katielynn wrote:
... but knowing what I do know about the military and having had this argument with MANY enlisted and officers of our military I have to say that I'm honestly afraid for the well being of these men and women if they come out openly. It's one thing to suspect or possibly know with out being told, so many of these neanderthals can lie to themselves about their coworkers orientation even after being faced with the truth but to be told point blank would be another matter. Sadly.



But I heard they were all heros and our nation's most precious resource.
____________________________
If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find someone that life has given vodka and have party.


This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
#10 Jul 01 2009 at 4:51 PM Rating: Good
***
2,453 posts
The neanderthals in the military that persecute people because they are gay, are the same ones that used to persecute people because they were black, or jewish, or just different in some other way. They are not, in my experience of actually having been in the military (and not just talking to those who are), is that they are in the minority. With each passing year that minority will grow smaller. The attitudes of younger people are very different from that of their elders, and people entering the military now and in the future will not have the same level of intolerance as their predecessors (aberrations excepted).

The conventional wisdom from years ago was that black people would not be tolerated in mixed race units (at least that was the rationalization), so they were segregated. When the armed forces were integrated, there were some clashes, but nothing on the scale that was expected or that could be used to justify the segregation to begin with. I expect the situation with homosexuals will be similar.

In short, the neanderthals are the problem, not the homosexuals. As soon as the orders come from the command structure to correct this, it will be corrected.
#11 Jul 02 2009 at 4:52 AM Rating: Decent
**
291 posts
Quote:
The neanderthals in the military that persecute people because they are gay, are the same ones that used to persecute people because they were black, or jewish, or just different in some other way. They are not, in my experience of actually having been in the military (and not just talking to those who are), is that they are in the minority. With each passing year that minority will grow smaller. The attitudes of younger people are very different from that of their elders, and people entering the military now and in the future will not have the same level of intolerance as their predecessors (aberrations excepted).


I suppose by your use of the term "neanderthals in the military" you are referring to military personnel who follow the lawful orders of their legally elected civilian superiors?
#12 Jul 02 2009 at 4:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
He was referring to Katie's statement, I believe.

I tend to agree with Deathwysh: when the command comes down, attitudes will fall in line. It has to start at the top. This was obvious in the 90s, and it's obvious now.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#13 Jul 02 2009 at 5:19 AM Rating: Good
**
291 posts

Quote:
when the command comes down, attitudes will fall in line. It has to start at the top. This was obvious in the 90s, and it's obvious now.


So everyone here who gives a damn and isn't just spouting off because it's fun should write to your President and tell him to get off the dime and give the order. It's not even a lot of work. Send him an email at:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

By the way, even some senior military officials have said it's time to allow homosexuals to serve openly, even a former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Shalikiashvili (although Colin Powell still opposes it, if less vigorously than in the past).

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/02/opinion/02shalikashvili.html

This report says attitudes have changed a lot (along with declining actual discharges).

http://www.palmcenter.org/node/263
#14 Jul 02 2009 at 5:36 AM Rating: Decent
Deathwysh wrote:
The neanderthals in the military that persecute people because they are gay, are the same ones that used to persecute people because they were black, or jewish, or just different in some other way. They are not, in my experience of actually having been in the military (and not just talking to those who are), is that they are in the minority. With each passing year that minority will grow smaller. The attitudes of younger people are very different from that of their elders, and people entering the military now and in the future will not have the same level of intolerance as their predecessors (aberrations excepted).

The conventional wisdom from years ago was that black people would not be tolerated in mixed race units (at least that was the rationalization), so they were segregated. When the armed forces were integrated, there were some clashes, but nothing on the scale that was expected or that could be used to justify the segregation to begin with. I expect the situation with homosexuals will be similar.

In short, the neanderthals are the problem, not the homosexuals. As soon as the orders come from the command structure to correct this, it will be corrected.


You are right! It is the neanderthals that are the problem. Unfortunately, we are still under the leader ship of people who were from another generation entirely. I'm with you. It needs to change. The biggest thing I hear from those who are against it is that it will cost too much to change the military, they believe we'll have to install more bathrooms, more showers, it'll hinder this or that. It's dumb, what they refuse to see is that the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy didn't change any of that, why would allowing openly gay/lesbian soldiers change that?

I'm not arguing against doing away with the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", I hope we can do away with it soon. I'm just relaying what I've been told and what I've heard on my own.
#15 Jul 02 2009 at 5:38 AM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
He was referring to Katie's statement, I believe.

I tend to agree with Deathwysh: when the command comes down, attitudes will fall in line. It has to start at the top. This was obvious in the 90s, and it's obvious now.



As to the command, each base is different. Each base has it's own personality I guess you could call it. Even if the big wigs in DC do away with it it's the individual command at the bases,the command in the units that needs to be upholding this and I don't for one minute believe that it's going to be followed every where. They might say they might, but as I've pointed out before, the military and their individual commands have a way of sweeping things under the rug.
#16 Jul 02 2009 at 7:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
So everyone here who gives a damn and isn't just spouting off because it's fun should write to your President and tell him to get off the dime and give the order.


I know you enjoy being pompous and snide and ****, but really: what makes you think I haven't already done that, or more?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#17 Jul 02 2009 at 7:57 AM Rating: Decent
**
291 posts
Quote:
I know you enjoy being pompous and snide and sh*t, but really: what makes you think I haven't already done that, or more?


Nothing.

EDIT: I don't know if I can do anything about snide and ****, but I'll try to be less pompous.

Edited, Jul 2nd 2009 12:06pm by Ahkuraj
#18 Jul 02 2009 at 8:15 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Ahkuraj wrote:
Quote:
I know you enjoy being pompous and snide and sh*t, but really: what makes you think I haven't already done that, or more?


Nothing.

EDIT: I don't know if I can do anything about snide and sh*t, but I'll try to be less pompous.

Edited, Jul 2nd 2009 12:06pm by Ahkuraj
Yeah, cuz Smash has the market cornered on pompous.

The whole attitude shift does have to come from above. The bigger problem with the prevalence of intolerance among the military (and I really DON'T know that it's a problem) I would think is, in part at least, due to throwing a bunch of scared, often uneducated, 'kids' into a strange land, trained only to protect and serve and not to empathize.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#19 Jul 02 2009 at 9:04 AM Rating: Good
**
291 posts
Quote:
I would think is, in part at least, due to throwing a bunch of scared, often uneducated, 'kids' into a strange land, trained only to protect and serve and not to empathize.


I don't suppose there's any non-pompous way for me to say this ... I was one of several squadron commanders at Air Force Basic Military Training for two years not too long ago. I was the lucky one who got to kick everyone out of the Air Force who wasn't meeting standards. We had very few homosexual discharge cases. Most of the people who claimed to be homosexual were more likely heterosexuals who couldn't take it and wanted us to kick them out. Once we told them they would have to complete Basic while we processed their discharge (which we told them would take more time than finishing Basic) most recanted their statement that they were homosexual and graduated Basic just fine.

We did have a couple of situations where people claimed they were being harassed by other recruits because they were believed to be homosexual. We investigated these cases without ever investigating whether the person was in fact homosexual. All we were interested in was whether they were being harassed; if we substantiated the harassment, we often kicked out the people doing the harassment. Even if we couldn't prove harassment, we moved the person complaining to another baracks for their protection, if they wanted to.

At Air Force Basic, these kids are put together from every conceivable background and put through tremendous stress, deliberately. In some cases, it seemed like specific people had hangups about homosexuals, very often resulting directly from whether or not they were raised to be tolerant. It was not generally a problem.

Now there was one ocassion (out of 76,000 recruits over 2 years) where there were multiple eyewitnesses to 2 male recruits kissing. Any kind of physical relations between recruits was against the rules. These two were already being discharged for other misconduct when this was discovered. We did kick out several male-female pairs who were caught in intimate acts because any kind of sexual conduct between recruits is against the rules (if it was minor, like holding hands or kissing, they would usually be given a direct order to knock it off, moved to different squadrons where they would have no contact, and given a second chance).

Now I know I can't speak for the other Services, but the Air Force is relatively benign toward its homosexual members. I've even had conversations with some Generals who have said they don't care one bit what consenting adults do as long as they follow the same kinds of rules that apply to everyone. Some older people in the Air Force might not like a change in policy allowing homosexuals to serve openly, but I think 99% or more would continue following direction from above, no matter what, and the rest would leave the Air Force one way or the other.
#20 Jul 02 2009 at 9:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
No, see, that wasn't pompous at all. That's good information.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#21 Jul 02 2009 at 11:35 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
Ahkuraj wrote:
So everyone here who gives a damn and isn't just spouting off because it's fun should write to your President and tell him to get off the dime and give the order. It's not even a lot of work.


He won't do it. Some nonsense about how even though he can he'd rather do it through congressional legislation. A bunch of reps even wrote him a letter saying "No. Really. Do it." and he still refused.

#22 Jul 03 2009 at 12:31 AM Rating: Decent
Let gays fight is all I can say, Kick *** and "ask questions later"?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 220 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (220)