Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

Honduras DemocracyFollow

#1 Jun 29 2009 at 1:34 PM Rating: Default
What a suprise Hillary Clinton, Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, and Daniel Ortega have all sided against a Democratic Honduras.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124623220955866301.html

Quote:
Mrs. Clinton has piled on as well. Yesterday she accused Honduras of violating "the precepts of the Interamerican Democratic Charter" and said it "should be condemned by all." Fidel Castro did just that. Mr. Chávez pledged to overthrow the new government.

Honduras is fighting back by strictly following the constitution. The Honduran Congress met in emergency session yesterday and designated its president as the interim executive as stipulated in Honduran law. It also said that presidential elections set for November will go forward. The Supreme Court later said that the military acted on its orders. It also said that when Mr. Zelaya realized that he was going to be prosecuted for his illegal behavior, he agreed to an offer to resign in exchange for safe passage out of the country. Mr. Zelaya denies it.



And here I thought the Obama policy on matters like this was not to "meddle".

#2 Jun 29 2009 at 1:51 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Yes... military coups are totally Democratic governments. Do you actually know what's going on? Here's a hint: when the president is acting in a manner the courts declare is illegal you usually impeach him, not arrest him through military might, lockdown the country, and force the old president into exile while having the military-backed Congress handpick a successor.

Edit: Reading the post you linked makes it obvious what your opinion in. Because Hugo Chavez backs the old president, the coup must be Democracy! Because the opposite would be, uh, socialism! Or something. Suffice it to say you don't like Chavez and don't actually know what the situation is but anyone whom he likes must be BAD.

Edited, Jun 29th 2009 5:53pm by LockeColeMA
#3 Jun 29 2009 at 2:12 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Based on this one article and no other relevant background info, I believe that the Honduran Congress was in the right to use the military in this fashion and oust a potentially abusive rogue President.

I don't think that we as a nation need to get involved, but Mrs. Clinton can state her opinion as she sees fit.

Edited, Jun 29th 2009 6:13pm by Debalic
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#4 Jun 29 2009 at 2:26 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,158 posts
I'd bet a considerable amount of money that until yesterday, varus would have been hard pushed to point out Honduras on a map.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#5 Jun 29 2009 at 5:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Well, to be fair even I would have only been able to give a general area. I always found that problematic with many of these little countries, when they're smaller than most of our states.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#6 Jun 29 2009 at 5:16 PM Rating: Good
What would you think if US soldiers, tired of Iraq and Afganistatan, had said **** it and overthrown Bush in 2004 and instated Senator Kerry? That's not democracy. What's going on Honduras . . . isn't democracy by a long shot.
#7 Jun 29 2009 at 5:19 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Debalic wrote:
Well, to be fair even I would have only been able to give a general area. I always found that problematic with many of these little countries, when they're smaller than most of our states.


To be fair that would be like an Englishman not knowing where Belgium was.

And also to be fair, taking into account the amount of 'dealings' the US has had in recent years in Honduras/El Salvador/ Nicaragua/ Guatamala, some basic knowledge of the whereabouts of those little countries south of your border, that have been of such interest to your various govts, shouldnt have been too hard to absorb surely....
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#8 Jun 29 2009 at 5:49 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
paulsol wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Well, to be fair even I would have only been able to give a general area. I always found that problematic with many of these little countries, when they're smaller than most of our states.


To be fair that would be like an Englishman not knowing where Belgium was.

And also to be fair, taking into account the amount of 'dealings' the US has had in recent years in Honduras/El Salvador/ Nicaragua/ Guatamala, some basic knowledge of the whereabouts of those little countries south of your border, that have been of such interest to your various govts, shouldnt have been too hard to absorb surely....

They're all in Central America. How's that for basic knowledge.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#9 Jun 29 2009 at 5:51 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
catwho wrote:
What would you think if US soldiers, tired of Iraq and Afganistatan, had said @#%^ it and overthrown Bush in 2004 and instated Senator Kerry? That's not democracy. What's going on Honduras . . . isn't democracy by a long shot.

What if Bush tried to re-write the Constitution, giving himself new exclusive powers, and our Congress had him removed from power? Granted, we have our own methods, like impeachment, but perhaps they do things differently down there.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#10 Jun 29 2009 at 6:10 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Debalic wrote:
catwho wrote:
What would you think if US soldiers, tired of Iraq and Afganistatan, had said @#%^ it and overthrown Bush in 2004 and instated Senator Kerry? That's not democracy. What's going on Honduras . . . isn't democracy by a long shot.

What if Bush tried to re-write the Constitution, giving himself new exclusive powers, and our Congress had him removed from power? Granted, we have our own methods, like impeachment, but perhaps they do things differently down there.


From what I have read he was trying to get a referendum to see if he could change the term conditions (ie, so he could run again). It would be put to a popular vote in the country first. The president was popular in select areas of the country, especially amongst the poor, but the military and Congress were not. Fearing his imminent reelection the Supreme Court declared the move illegal, arrested the president, and instated their own candidate. The former president went to Costa Rica.

There are two real camps on this thought opposing the military coup (and yes, it was a military coup). The one spouted by Chavez is to stir up trouble. He can point to the problems in Honduras and say to his people "Look at the fascists! Isn't it great you have me? We need to support our friends, ra ra ra!" That's the main issue right there. Then there's the camp in which the US and the UN fall. Destabilization is bad, because it's lending support to leftist governments like that of Chanvez. It is also bad because it is democracy failing; and a military state OR a socialist state are both unwelcome by the US. Obama wants democracy preserved; that doesn't mean he wants new leftist dictator AT ALL. Assuming the referendum failed, Zelaya would be out in 7 months anyway. If it passed, then the other candidate better start campaigning well.

What should have happened is the impeachment process should have taken place, since every other branch of the government declared Zelaya's actions illegal. Instead the other branches let the military take over, gave up democracy, and chose their own candidate.


And as for the comment, Bush did give himself new powers; we just didn't do anything about it :-P
#11 Jun 29 2009 at 6:21 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I didn't see in the stated article what the referendum was for; it didn't state that he was trying to extend his term. I haven't gotten to look for any other articles on the topic.

But what I did read from your post is that you believe this is bad because Obama doesn't like it, regardless of the merits of democracy on its own. Hell, I don't believe that we should force every country in the world to become a democracy modeled on our own Constitution
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#12 Jun 29 2009 at 6:27 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
And also to be fair, taking into account the amount of 'dealings' the US has had in recent years in Honduras/El Salvador/ Nicaragua/ Guatamala, some basic knowledge of the whereabouts of those little countries south of your border, that have been of such interest to your various govts, shouldnt have been too hard to absorb surely....


It's funny because you think that we teach geography.

They taught geography in highschool, at ninth grade, as an optional course that would delay world history for a year; of course if people aren't constantly exposed to that knowledge and practice it, they're going to forget it.

In university, as part of world history and "global issues" (whatever that is supposed to cover) they gave a map test that everyone was required to pass in order to pass the class, you know, standard fare: label 25 randomly chosen countries. A lot of people had to retake that thing.

I didn't get every single question myself.. I mean sometimes you transpose two next-door countries or whatever, but I passed it fine, but that's basically the extent of the geography practice I've seen in my education. It's not sufficient to give someone a knowledge of the precise, or absolute location of a country.


Quote:
To be fair that would be like an Englishman not knowing where Belgium was.


Belgium is about as far from England as North Carolina is from Georgia. Geographical knowledge is important to cultivate but this really isn't a good comparison of ignorance relevant to reasonable expectation.

Edited, Jun 29th 2009 10:30pm by Pensive
#13 Jun 29 2009 at 6:32 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Debalic wrote:

But what I did read from your post is that you believe this is bad because Obama doesn't like it, regardless of the merits of democracy on its own. Hell, I don't believe that we should force every country in the world to become a democracy modeled on our own Constitution


I don't think so either. And no, I don't think its bad because Obama doesn't like it; I simply understand the thinking behind taking a stand. Stability in a region plagued by a lack thereof is desired. Right now either the military takes over (which throws the area into chaos thanks to in-country demonstrations/reprisals and because of outside interference) or the country could turn socialistic, joining with other anti-US countries and becoming another annoyance. What would be best is the status quo, which is what Obama desires.
#14 Jun 29 2009 at 6:52 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Pensive wrote:


It's funny because you think that we teach geography.


No. I spent enough time in the USA to know that geography isnt taught to any extent in the schools there.


Quote:
To be fair that would be like an Englishman not knowing where Belgium was.


Pensive wrote:


Belgium is about as far from England as North Carolina is from Georgia. Geographical knowledge is important to cultivate but this really isn't a good comparison of ignorance relevant to reasonable expectation.



I'm assuming that most of us have learned about the geographical relationships of various countries by looking at them on maps and such as opposed to walking between them, and unless your map is of a unuasually large scale, the distance would never be more than a few centimeters (inches).

(Having said that tho, I did in fact personnaly walk accross the border from Guatamala to Honduras after a visit to this place) wich was actually pretty interesting if you ever happen to be in the area.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#15 Jun 29 2009 at 7:50 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
I'm assuming that most of us have learned about the geographical relationships of various countries by looking at them on maps and such as opposed to walking between them, and unless your map is of a unuasually large scale, the distance would never be more than a few centimeters (inches).


Why did you mention Belgium if not for it's proximity to England?
#16 Jun 29 2009 at 8:08 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

I could pinpoint Belgium easily but Honduras I would have had to guess between it, Guatemala, and Nicaragua. I think Belgium has had a lot more dealings with England than Honduras with the US. And Belgium has a lot more globally notable "things" about it than Honduras. It's also got twice as many people, 33 times the GDP, and 5 times the armed forces.




Edited, Jun 29th 2009 11:21pm by trickybeck
#17 Jun 29 2009 at 8:30 PM Rating: Default
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
paulsol mentioned Belgium because his second language is self-righteous douchebag though he is unable to spell in either language.

I agree with LockeColeMa. The US should back the government that will keep the region stable. Chavez and Castro's reactions shouldn't be part of his equation.





Edited, Jun 30th 2009 1:20am by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#18 Jun 29 2009 at 9:45 PM Rating: Good
Debalic wrote:
catwho wrote:
What would you think if US soldiers, tired of Iraq and Afganistatan, had said @#%^ it and overthrown Bush in 2004 and instated Senator Kerry? That's not democracy. What's going on Honduras . . . isn't democracy by a long shot.

What if Bush tried to re-write the Constitution, giving himself new exclusive powers, and our Congress had him removed from power? Granted, we have our own methods, like impeachment, but perhaps they do things differently down there.


Also worth mentioning is that the Honduran constitution explicitly states that anyone who proposes changing the presidential term limit (one term) must immediately be removed from office and barred from holding public office for 10 years.

And that the Honduran constitution does not describe a mechanism for impeachment.



Anyway, given that Zelaya had already ignored the supreme court, the legislature, and the constitution several times, I doubt there were workable options beyond evicting him with the military.
#19 Jun 29 2009 at 9:46 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Pensive wrote:
In university, as part of world history and "global issues" (whatever that is supposed to cover) they gave a map test that everyone was required to pass in order to pass the class, you know, standard fare: label 25 randomly chosen countries. A lot of people had to retake that thing.


It's not that ******* hard. You get a world map and stare at it for a few hours.

On the coup: I can't argue which faction the US should be supporting because we haven't yet seen how the junta is going to act. They might be in the process of installing a military dictatorship or they might genuinely be trying to safeguard the democracy. It's too early to tell.

But as a general rule, military coups are bad. They can be justified, but this one hasn't been justified yet. The junta needs to prove itself capable of transitioning back to democracy. So I'm not surprised that the US is condemning the coup. That should be America's automatic response. If they decided to intervene and reinstall the president, that'd be bad. What they've done just now is say "Military coups are bad."

Really, it's far too early to tell. Either party could be in the wrong.
#20 Jun 30 2009 at 12:02 AM Rating: Good
BastokFL wrote:
Also worth mentioning is that the Honduran constitution explicitly states that anyone who proposes changing the presidential term limit (one term) must immediately be removed from office and barred from holding public office for 10 years.
It also says that, through some sort of court action (sue me, I'm using Wikipedia as a reference) their citizenship can be canceled for that.

That has got to be one of the world's most bizarre constitutions. I suspect there's a clause stating that every time the 27th lands on a Thursday, a chicken must be mailed to every single woman whose last name begins with a vowel.
#21 Jun 30 2009 at 12:26 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
It's not that @#%^ing hard.


Especially when a list of 100 possible countries are provided to you beforehand, I agree. I'm just stating facts.

What I mean to convey is that there's a middle ground: geography's important, but not knowing where honduras is of all places is not an inexcusable lack of knowledge.

Not knowing where Cuba is? (for an American) yeah.
#22 Jun 30 2009 at 1:30 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
And at the risk of being accused of being self-righteous again The old ones are always the best......
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#23 Jun 30 2009 at 2:09 AM Rating: Decent
paulsol wrote:
And at the risk of being accused of being self-righteous again The old ones are always the best......


There are those made in other countries too, not just the US. I've seen similar videos of local people too on television, equally embarassing. Not all that many people I know will be able to point out Honduras on a blind map, apart from it being in Central America perhaps.

And Honduras's population is about 4/5th that of Belgium. It's half that of the Netherlands. I also doubt that the Honduras army is five times smaller, not given the serious cuts in recent years. Heck, most of our army is in Afghanistan, or so it feels like anyway, at this time.

GDP is about 15 times larger.

#24 Jun 30 2009 at 2:25 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Jebus, you lot are touchy about geography!
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#25 Jun 30 2009 at 3:36 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
paulsol wrote:
And at the risk of being accused of being self-righteous again The old ones are always the best......


To be perfectly fair, Australians aren't any better. Most of us don't even know that Indonesia exists, much less that it's our most important neighbour.
#26 Jun 30 2009 at 3:37 AM Rating: Good
Ok, Paul, here are ten geography questions. Don't cheat!

1) Who is the reigning monarch of Sealand?
2) What's the principal export of India?
3) Which has the higher sheep to people ratio, Wales or New Zealand?
4) Which country has sex with the most sheep annually?
5) Name a country beginning with x.
6) Name the world's third largest island.
7) Name the second largest empire ever to exist.
8) Why does no one care about Ireland?
9) Where is the cave of tits located?
10) Which continent is the most awesome?

Edited, Jun 30th 2009 11:38am by Kavekk
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 260 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (260)