Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

The State of the "New" AsylumFollow

#27 Jun 14 2009 at 10:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Warchief Annabella wrote:
Complaining about admin persecution is very OOT. Maybe Omegavegata would be better off in our forum, where he can share our martyrdom. I've never seen an asylum thread where they ******* like this.

Oh, there's been ******** about admins alright. Moreso in a mocking, critical manner than a whiny one, however.

#28 Jun 14 2009 at 4:18 PM Rating: Excellent
This is simply a quest for information.

Also, bare breasts ("brief nudity") & the flipping of the bird are both allowed in PG-13 flicks.

____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#29 Jun 14 2009 at 5:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Well, they aren't here.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#30 Jun 14 2009 at 6:33 PM Rating: Decent
*****
12,846 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
This is simply a quest for information.

Also, bare breasts ("brief nudity") & the flipping of the bird are both allowed in PG-13 flicks.



so why not just pm an admin?
#31 Jun 14 2009 at 6:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
niobia wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
This is simply a quest for information.

Also, bare breasts ("brief nudity") & the flipping of the bird are both allowed in PG-13 flicks.



so why not just pm an admin?


No attention *****-ing that way!


GTFO noob, ESAD, etc. (not you, nio)
#32 Jun 14 2009 at 7:27 PM Rating: Decent
*****
12,846 posts
>.> since it is an attention whoring thread....I thought I'd show off a picture of little Ms. Suki, at her tumbling class.
Screenshot

#33 Jun 14 2009 at 7:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
niobia wrote:
>.> since it is an attention whoring thread....
I'm confused, I thought every thread was for that.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#34 Jun 14 2009 at 7:42 PM Rating: Decent
*****
12,846 posts
Xsarus wrote:
niobia wrote:
>.> since it is an attention whoring thread....
I'm confused, I thought every thread was for that.

only if it involves whatsisfaces elvishly adorable children
#35 Jun 14 2009 at 8:28 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
19,369 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:


Blurring or editing, if done to a sufficient degree and depending ont he situation depicted is ok. Whether Angsty is ok with you using his face is up to him.

Regarding nobby and naughtyword's avatars, there are definite lines. the pictures in question are fully clothed, do not involve any gropeing (Edit for clarity: the lifting motion in rimesume's doesn't involve grasping of the nipple, it's borderline, but we've allowed it. that's about as bad as we would let go though) or particularily sexually suggestive gestures, or anything that would make them forbiddon from being put on tv. Yes, you could theoretically put a guy ina thong up however there is a slight difference as that would be a motion which could be interperated as sexually suggestive given the mechanics of copulation. It would probably depend on how explicit it was, how many complaints it generated, etc. I don't particularily want to see that, but if I nuked every avatar i just didn't like without good reason, well there would be a few more deleted than there are.

If you think it might be a bad choice to put up as an avatar, don't put it up.



It's funny because it's a bit hypocritical of some users.

I tried an experiment once. Someone had posted a black and white picture of two girls laying down on a bed in their underwear and embraced in a kiss. I took the photo and cropped it so it only showed the top portion of the photo; including only their heads and nothing else. I then found a photo of two guys lip locked. Both of these images were the same basic concept; two homosexuals embraced in a kiss, no nudity, etc. Then I put them both up as my avatar for a while, first the two guys. The response was quick, I received threats and bigoted comments in my pm box as well as posts in various threads I participated in but had nothing to do with my avatar. I was quickly told be an admin it had to go. This was expected. As soon as it went down I put up the two girls as my avatar. It was the complete opposite; I was never asked to take it down, received no complaints in my pms but did receive praise and comments of satisfaction in threads I posted in, again none of which had anything to do with the avatar. Eventually I took it down as an avatar and called out the obvious hypocrisy of the posters in general.

I'm not gay and I don't like extreme pda. I find guys kissing guys to be gross. Ewwwww. Girls kissing girls I find to be very hot. Mmmmmmm. However I think if one is allowed both should be. The content is basically the same, it's just a matter of taste of whether someone likes it or not, like someone who prefers chocolate over vanilla or vice versa. The hypocrisy was sickening. I just found it interesting how differently the two images were responded to, not really surprised just interesting.



Edited, Jun 14th 2009 10:30pm by MentalFrog
#36 Jun 15 2009 at 4:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
*sniff* Our little MentalFrog... all grown up and running experiments! Where has the time gone??
#37 Jun 15 2009 at 5:07 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
MentalFrog wrote:

I tried an experiment once.
You dissected a Biologist!?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#38 Jun 15 2009 at 7:18 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
It was revenge for this.

I find a woman hurting a man deliberately equally repugnant.

Watching her laugh at deliberately belting the guy is a bit ironic for me though, because I have a reflex where I laugh convulsively any time I accidentally physically hurt someone badly. It's like an overflow of adrenaline or something. It happened once when I accidentally collided heads with someone and gave him a blood nose, and a second time when I accidentally poured almost boiling temperature tea from a teapot over someone's bare arm.

On both occasions, the laughing didn't help the situation. Especially the tea situation where the reflexive laughter took over and my body kept pouring scalding tea up the length of his arm. Smiley: um
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 582 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (582)