Allegory wrote:
Elinda wrote:
I really don't think that my original comment was that hard to 'get' if taken with in the context of all them posts above it, including the one I quoted. Was it?
It isn't hard to get; it's just incomplete information.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- What is it about failed artists and violent anti-semitism?
What is it about failed artists and violent anti-semitism?Follow
It isn't hard to get; it's just incomplete information.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Elinda wrote:
No it's all there.
Ok let's look at your first quote.
Quote:
The Daily Show is no more opinion forming than SNL's Weekend Update. If you are NOT already informed, most of the content will be meaningless.
You think this is complete information.
You are saying TDS' opinion making power is equal to or less than SNL's correct? You don't see how it is important for you to specify how TDS and SNL relate to other shows?
Let me tell you there are three (well actually more, but that'd be even more redundant) possibilities here. 1) TDS and SNL both influence people less than CBS (for example). 2) TDS is less effective at influencing than CBS, and CBS is less effective at influencing than SNL. 3) TDS and SNL are both more effective at influencing than CBS.
You started with the statement x<=y, but you have NOT said what x and y are relative to other shows, z.
All of the following are valid possibilities.
x<=y<z
x<=y<=z
x<=y=z
x<=z<=y
z=x<=y
z<=x<=y
z<x<=y
I think I got them all.
Edited, Jun 12th 2009 12:46pm by Allegory
Oh God, Allegory, just stop.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Warchief Annabella wrote:
Oh God, Allegory, just stop.
It's going to be difficult to stop me from finding this hilarious... or quite easy because people could easily become bored/frustrated/lost and stop posting.
I think it's funny when to find out how long someone will argue with me that I'm making a trivial point. There have been people people willing to go pages and days with me telling me how trivial the point I'm making is, but they don't want to simply admit I was right and end the trivial discussion. I do hope the irony is not lost on them.
Allegory wrote:
Warchief Annabella wrote:
Oh God, Allegory, just stop.
It's going to be difficult to stop me from finding this hilarious... or quite easy because people could easily become bored/frustrated/lost and stop posting.
I think it's funny when to find out how long someone will argue with me that I'm making a trivial point. There have been people people willing to go pages and days with me telling me how trivial the point I'm making is, but they don't want to simply admit I was right and end the trivial discussion. I do hope the irony is not lost on them.
No, you are being condescending and irritating while also sounding moronic. I don't think you are a moron, so I get embarrassed for you.
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Allegory wrote:
Elinda wrote:
No it's all there.
Ok let's look at your first quote.
Quote:
The Daily Show is no more opinion forming than SNL's Weekend Update. If you are NOT already informed, most of the content will be meaningless.
You think this is complete information.
You are saying TDS' opinion making power is equal to or less than SNL's correct? You don't see how it is important for you to specify how TDS and SNL relate to other shows?
No. My statement, well at least one of them, is not dependent on the degree to which political opinion may be formulated by real news.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Allegory wrote:
I think it's funny when to find out how long someone will argue with me that I'm making a trivial point. There have been people people willing to go pages and days with me telling me how trivial the point I'm making is, but they don't want to simply admit I was right and end the trivial discussion. I do hope the irony is not lost on them.
You tell 'em! You little noble crusader of logic.
Edited, Jun 12th 2009 1:58pm by CBD
Allegory wrote:
Warchief Annabella wrote:
Oh God, Allegory, just stop.
but they don't want to simply admit I was right and end the trivial discussion. I do hope the irony is not lost on them.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Elinda wrote:
No. My statement, well at least one of them, is not dependent on the degree to which political opinion may be formulated by real news.
So we're back to "right, but irrelevant?"
So you've said Tim is the same height or shorter than Mary. But in an argument about whether Tim is short or tall this alone is useless data. It's incomplete information.You could still be saying TDS is extremely influential. You could be saying TDS has virtually no effect.
Edited, Jun 12th 2009 1:16pm by Allegory
Allegory wrote:
Elinda wrote:
No. My statement, well at least one of them, is not dependent on the degree to which political opinion may be formulated by real news.
So we're back to "right, but irrelevant?"
So you've said Tim is the same height or shorter than Mary. But in an argument about whether Tim is short or tall this alone is useless data. It's incomplete information.You could still be saying TDS is extremely influential. You could be saying TDS has virtually no effect.
Edited, Jun 12th 2009 1:16pm by Allegory
So you see, you're still making comments of an egotistical jerk and I'm still correct in my statement.
Do you date much?
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Elinda wrote:
Do you date much?
Only radiocarbon, I'm pretty sure.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Elinda wrote:
Do you date much?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Elinda wrote:
No, I was saying that I don't think TDS formulates political opinion. Didn't I say that?
That's not what you said specifically in that quote, but you did say that in another post. I also already told you why this was wrong. You haven't specified a degree. Whether you mean "I don't think TDS formulates any political opinion," or "I don't think TDS formulates significant political opinion," remains ambiguous. The former is the more literal interpretation and the latter the more intentional interpretation. You have yet to clear up which you meant.
Elinda wrote:
Do you date much?
Honey, you're hearing my pickup lines.
Edited, Jun 12th 2009 1:46pm by Allegory
I'd have sex with Allegory.
Just thought I should put that out there.
Just thought I should put that out there.
Allegory wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Do you date much?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Kavekk wrote:
I'd have sex with Allegory.
Just thought I should put that out there.
Just thought I should put that out there.
Can you be more specific?
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samira wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
I'd have sex with Allegory.
Just thought I should put that out there.
Just thought I should put that out there.
Can you be more specific?
He'd go to 2nd base only. No gratuitous reach arounds. Possible hand job if Allegory is willing to buy dinner. Steak and two potatoes AND a dessert of his choosing. And no, Allegory, Bonanza doesn't count as a restaurant option.
It all has to be quantifiable and verifiable in a sexy way.
Edited, Jun 12th 2009 3:00pm by Annabella
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Samira wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
I'd have sex with Allegory.
Just thought I should put that out there.
Just thought I should put that out there.
Can you be more specific?
OK.
Things I would do with Allegory:
Oral sex, aural sex, **** sex, roleplaying, mud wrestling, brunch.
Things I would not do with Allegory:
FFXI, banjo playing, watersports, scat, blood play, bondage, mutilation, auto-erotic asphyxiation, necrophilia, vore, the Etruscan puffer fish position.
I guess other things are kind of up in the air, so to speak. I was thinking of more of an ad hoc thing than a carefully planned campaign.
Kavekk wrote:
Things I would do with Allegory:
roleplaying... a carefully planned campaign.
roleplaying... a carefully planned campaign.
I think you'd be sorely disappointed in what we ended up doing.
Well, would I be allowed to play an elephant riding paladin?
If I dated allegory it would just end up in Melee.
***
There are rules for enabling exotic mounts, but it varies with setting of course. If you were in a planes campaign or something it wouldn't make much sense.
Edited, Jun 12th 2009 3:41pm by Pensive
***
Quote:
Well, would I be allowed to play an elephant riding paladin?
There are rules for enabling exotic mounts, but it varies with setting of course. If you were in a planes campaign or something it wouldn't make much sense.
Edited, Jun 12th 2009 3:41pm by Pensive
Quote:
Elinda wrote:
Do you date much?
Honey, you're hearing my pickup lines.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Quote:
Etruscan puffer fish position
I'll admit, I was sad Google and urbandictionary did not reveal what this was.
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
If I dated allegory it would just end up in Melee.
I would love a transcript of any conversations the two of you might have.
"How do you know?"
"How do I know what?"
"How do you know what you know?"
"What are you asking that I know?"
"Whether or not you're certain."
"Certain about what?"
"False."
"What is false?"
"An idea. You are wrong."
"What am I wrong about?"
Oh it makes my heart a-flutter.
Recent Visitors: 288
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (288)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- What is it about failed artists and violent anti-semitism?
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC