Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Get your D*mn feet off the deskFollow

#102REDACTED, Posted: Jun 11 2009 at 5:57 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Time,
#103 Jun 11 2009 at 6:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Spoken like a true peon.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#104 Jun 11 2009 at 6:17 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Time,

Quote:
No, "white collar folks" don't find these things sacrosanct. Successful people care much more about the content of their appointments than the meaningless trivialities.


Why bother getting your clothes cleaned before a big meeting? Why bother shining your shoes? I mean obviously you don't think these things matter.

In order to get to the content the client has to feel good about who they are dealing with. If you're wearing sh*t stained shirts and shoes covered in excrement guess how far you're going to get.
Smiley: dubiouswho said anything about having **** on your cloths? I wear clean cloths every day so I guess I don't understand the idea of just washing my cloths before a big meeting. That's weird varrus, do you really sit in your office covered in ****? Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#105 Jun 11 2009 at 6:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Xsarus wrote:
publiusvarus wrote:
Time,

Quote:
No, "white collar folks" don't find these things sacrosanct. Successful people care much more about the content of their appointments than the meaningless trivialities.


Why bother getting your clothes cleaned before a big meeting? Why bother shining your shoes? I mean obviously you don't think these things matter.

In order to get to the content the client has to feel good about who they are dealing with. If you're wearing sh*t stained shirts and shoes covered in excrement guess how far you're going to get.
Smiley: dubiouswho said anything about having sh*t on your cloths? I wear clean cloths every day so I guess I don't understand the idea of just washing my cloths before a big meeting. That's weird varrus, do you really sit in your office covered in sh*t? Smiley: oyvey


If other people find him as bloody annoying as I do, I imagine theres a queue lined up at his workplace to throw excrement at him . I know I'd enjoy doing so.
#106 Jun 11 2009 at 8:21 AM Rating: Excellent
It's casual day at my office, so we're all wearing jeans as we arrange the beginnings of the occasional multi-million dollar deal. No one on the other end of my phone cares that I have on Birkenstocks.

Yes, yes, I'm sure the outside sales/account executives who close the deals we start up are wearing crisp suits and ties, but don't paint all white collar jobs with such a broad paint brush. Inside sales and marketing is pretty relaxed overall.
#107 Jun 11 2009 at 8:28 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Morganne, Star Breaker wrote:
Thing is, if I put my feet up on the desk at work I would get frowned at, even if I was sealing a million pound deal. If I put my feet up on the desk at home my wife would staple my ******** to my forehead and chop my feet of for good measure.
If I was that hen-pecked at both home and work, I'd spend a lot of time in my car.
You shouldn't put your feet up on your dashboard in case the airbags go off.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#108 Jun 11 2009 at 4:34 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
If I was that hen-pecked at both home and work, I'd spend a lot of time in my car.


Picking up hookers right?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#109 Jun 11 2009 at 4:41 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
Why bother getting your clothes cleaned before a big meeting? Why bother shining your shoes? I mean obviously you don't think these things matter.

In order to get to the content the client has to feel good about who they are dealing with. If you're wearing sh*t stained shirts and shoes covered in excrement guess how far you're going to get.


Yeah, uh, who the hell wanders around covered in business suits covered in *****?

---

If you have to make this analogy it's pretty clear your argument has no substance sans perhaps an illicit one.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#110 Jun 11 2009 at 7:25 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Quote:
Why bother getting your clothes cleaned before a big meeting? Why bother shining your shoes? I mean obviously you don't think these things matter.

In order to get to the content the client has to feel good about who they are dealing with. If you're wearing sh*t stained shirts and shoes covered in excrement guess how far you're going to get.


Yeah, uh, who the hell wanders around covered in business suits covered in *****?

---

If you have to make this analogy it's pretty clear your argument has no substance sans perhaps an illicit one.

It's too bad there's no middle ground between $500 patent leathers with a mirror shine, and holey, Shit-encrusted tennis shoes.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#111REDACTED, Posted: Jun 11 2009 at 9:40 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Couldn't you have found a pic of any other President doing that?
#112 Jun 11 2009 at 10:32 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
malee wrote:
It's times like these your Canadian really comes out.
Smiley: dubiouswhat?
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#113 Jun 12 2009 at 2:58 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,229 posts
malee wrote:
[It's times like these your Canadian really comes out.


Are you saying Ugly is 'coming out?' Smiley: dubious
#114 Jun 12 2009 at 3:47 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
malee wrote:
It's times like these your Canadian really comes out.


YAY!

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#115 Jun 12 2009 at 4:00 AM Rating: Good
Samira wrote:
Spoken like a true peon.


Varrus wrote:
Whaaat?

No time for play!
#116REDACTED, Posted: Jun 12 2009 at 5:34 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Still apologizing for Obama I see. You people are getting good at that.
#117 Jun 12 2009 at 7:15 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,829 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Still apologizing for Obama I see. You people are getting good at that.



No need to be insecure, Virus. No one will ever take your "Presidential Apologist" crown away. Your eight years of pretzel-bending feats of logical contortionism during Dubya's administration have firmly established your entitlement to the life-long title.
#118REDACTED, Posted: Jun 12 2009 at 8:06 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Amby,
#119 Jun 12 2009 at 8:11 AM Rating: Excellent
Hey, Clinton's favorables are way up now that we've seen what God-fearing Bush did to the country. He's more popular now than he was during most of his actual tenure as president.

Bill was a total sleezeball, but he's certainly not the first President to let the little commander in chief get out of control, and he won't be the last. (Perhap's Bush's one strong point was his fidelity to Laura. I'm betting Obama is also going to be loyal to Michelle, if for no other reason than she can probably break his neck with her bare hands. Smiley: inlove)
#120 Jun 12 2009 at 8:42 AM Rating: Good
***
3,909 posts
Bush had a lot of personal flaws, and he never should have been President, but it's unfair to demonise the guy. He just wasn't cut out for the job, which honestly is something that applies to most of the American population.

I don't know. The more I think about how virulently I hated Bush and Howard while they were in office, the more I think I overreacted. They were conservatives, and wrong on a lot of important issues, but they did what they thought was right. There's something understandable there.

Anyway, feet on the desk are irrelevant and such. He's the President and it's his desk. This is a guy you people trust with your nuclear weapons. Are you really going to worry about his treatment of a desk that belongs to him?
#121REDACTED, Posted: Jun 12 2009 at 10:13 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You people??
#122REDACTED, Posted: Jun 15 2009 at 4:21 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) What you got to realise is that for all the wonderful weapons the U.S has and for all the technology available to point it and shoot it at someone you get the feeling that they will never really push the big red button because they are probably worried about hitting their own or allied troops. Lets face it, they have a better hit rate against allied troops than they do against the enemy.
#123 Jun 15 2009 at 4:30 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Morganne, Star Breaker wrote:


What you got to realise is that for all the wonderful weapons the U.S has and for all the technology available to point it and shoot it at someone you get the feeling that they will never really push the big red button because they are probably worried about hitting their own or allied troops. Lets face it, they have a better hit rate against allied troops than they do against the enemy.

I can just see Obama giving the command to launch tactical Nuclear weapons and his advisors pointing out to him the California no longer exists and that an internal investigation will be started but the likelihood is that its down to wiring that was put together by good 'ol Jim who is 98 years old, wall eyed and has arthristis in every bone in his body who had to get home for 5pm before his wife gave him a good 'ol beating for missing tea.

LOL


No, seriously, what the **** did you just say? I have no idea.
#124REDACTED, Posted: Jun 15 2009 at 4:44 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Do you have T.V?
#125 Jun 15 2009 at 4:52 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Morganne, Star Breaker wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
[quote=Morganne, Star Breaker]

What you got to realise is that for all the wonderful weapons the U.S has and for all the technology available to point it and shoot it at someone you get the feeling that they will never really push the big red button because they are probably worried about hitting their own or allied troops. Lets face it, they have a better hit rate against allied troops than they do against the enemy.

I can just see Obama giving the command to launch tactical Nuclear weapons and his advisors pointing out to him the California no longer exists and that an internal investigation will be started but the likelihood is that its down to wiring that was put together by good 'ol Jim who is 98 years old, wall eyed and has arthristis in every bone in his body who had to get home for 5pm before his wife gave him a good 'ol beating for missing tea.

LOL


No, seriously, what the @#%^ did you just say? I have no idea.


*****************

No, I repeat, your post made no sense. I have no idea what it meant. What's "the California"? Who is 98-year-old Jim? What does tea have to do with it? I think you're high on something, because you make less sense than a dollar.
#126REDACTED, Posted: Jun 15 2009 at 4:58 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Yup, your American alright, closed of ignorance at anything that may be a criticism of your nation and its armed forces.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 256 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (256)