Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Cali Leading the Fight?Follow

#102 Jun 10 2009 at 11:57 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
For one he could end this conspiracy theory nonsense with one phone call.


I believe Joph asked what was in it for him, not what was in it for you.

Good to see you acknowledge that it's nonsense though.



Edited, Jun 10th 2009 3:58pm by CBD
#103 Jun 10 2009 at 12:00 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Actually if he just unsealed it I, along with millions others, would be satisfied.
No, you wouldn't be. You be cursing him for putting his feet up on his desk.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#104 Jun 10 2009 at 12:05 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Locked,

Quote:
So you're saying that, even after revealing a copy of the birth certification, and having it verified by several sources from respected medical and judicial offices


There you go making things up again.

Hawaiian Health Director Chiyome ********* and Dr. Alvin Onaka have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.[/quote wrote:

[quote]When the birth certificate arrived from the Obama campaign it confirmed his name as the other documents already showed it. Still, we took an extra step: We e-mailed it to the Hawaii Department of Health, which maintains such records, to ask if it was real.

"It's a valid Hawaii state birth certificate," spokesman Janice Okubo told us.

"I guess the big issue that's being raised is the lack of an embossed seal and a signature," Okubo said, pointing out that in Hawaii, both those things are on the back of the document. "Because they scanned the front … you wouldn't see those things."

Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html wrote:
FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as "supporting documents" to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.


Dismissed cases:
http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html wrote:
A southwest Ohio magistrate rejected a challenge to Obama's U.S. citizenship. Judges in Seattle and Philadelphia recently dismissed similar suits.


Note that the FactCheck.org site has pictures of the actual certificate, not the digitally scanned version.
#105 Jun 10 2009 at 12:07 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
There's no need to. It's over. It's a non-issue.

Unless, of course, then it's true that the judicial and legislative systems are just as corrupt as the executive, as well as all the state governors. In that case, I think it's time you took up your guns and your dogs and round up the hookers and start a revolution!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#106 Jun 10 2009 at 12:09 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
And just to verify, and to put one more nail in the "I'm a crazy Rush-listener" coffin, Varrus: you don't believe Obama is an American citizen? Despite all the of the proof for it, and none against it? Despite courts throwing out cases because there is no proof against his citizenship? Despite the health director of the state of Hawaii confirming it? Despite pictures of the actual document AND the digital document?

You know he's as much of a citizen as it is possible to know that one is a citizen while respecting their rights of privacy.
#107REDACTED, Posted: Jun 10 2009 at 12:16 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Explain away. Until it's unsealed and verified by someone other than liberal sycophants I won't believe it.
#108 Jun 10 2009 at 12:18 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Explain away. Until it's unsealed and verified by someone other than liberal sycophants I won't believe it.

That's nice. Really. Irrelevant, though, because every President who ever took office does not have to personally show his authentic birth certificate to every dimwitted hick who calls it into question on a mostly-anonymous forum.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#109REDACTED, Posted: Jun 10 2009 at 12:19 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Debo,
#110 Jun 10 2009 at 12:24 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Debo,

Has this ever been a question for US president?


How about a candidate?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/us/politics/11mccain.html
#111 Jun 10 2009 at 12:25 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I don't know. Has it?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#112 Jun 10 2009 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Explain away. Until it's unsealed and verified by someone other than liberal sycophants I won't believe it.


So, the Hawaiian director of health is a liberal sycophant? Nevermind that she has only donated to the Republican party. Or FactCheck.org?
Quote:
FactCheck.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit website that describes itself as a "'consumer advocate' for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics." It is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, and is funded primarily by the Annenberg Foundation.


I think I missed when these people were taken in by mind control.

Edit: Forgot PolitiFact, which is a service of the St. Petersburg Times and CQ (Congressional Quarterly).

Edited, Jun 10th 2009 4:29pm by LockeColeMA
#113 Jun 10 2009 at 12:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
For one he could end this conspiracy theory nonsense with one phone call.
Hahahaha...


No.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#114 Jun 10 2009 at 12:39 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
The problem is that the phrase "birth certificate" is commonly used, but in this case, the only certificate we have seen is a "Certification of Live Birth", which is not the same thing. In Hawaii at that time, those certifications were simply a record that the person existed and could be obtained by pretty much anyone.

The full long form Birth Certificate includes information such as the hospital where he was born, the signature of the doctor who delivered him, etc. The Certification of Live Birth only proves that Obama was born, is a real person, and his mother was residing in Hawaii at the time she applied for the Certification. To prove that Barack was actually born in the state of Hawaii, the actual long form Birth Certificate would be required and the contents would need to show that he was born in Hawaii and not simply declared to be living in Hawaii (both were "valid" at the time in question, but only one qualifies him to be President).


So far, the only statement about the long form document is that it exists. Which does not tell us what information it contains. What's suspiciously absent from every official statement from every person who has seen the long form document is a statement that the form verifies that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. While I'm perfectly willing to acknowledge that this might just have been an oversight, I and a whole lot of other people would really feel a lot better if someone would simply certify this officially. No one yet has, and until they do, this matter will remain an issue.


They had a whole set of hearings to establish whether McCain was qualified to be President when he ran. Doesn't it seem even a bit strange that there hasn't been a single "official" determination on this? Just challenges and court rulings, but those aren't being made by people who've seen the long form document. The only official on the record statement we have is the one quoted earlier, which only states that a long form certificate exists. Why not go that extra step?...


And no. This issue is not over just because the latest round of legal challenges failed.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#115 Jun 10 2009 at 12:43 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
So, gbaji, what you're trying to say is that you also do not believe that Obama is a US citizen and is not a legitimate President?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#116 Jun 10 2009 at 12:45 PM Rating: Excellent
If it turns out that Obama really isn't a natural born citizen, then I see it nothing more as a precedent to allow other non-natural born citizens to become president.

Arnold Schwarzenegger for Prez 2012! Then Cali really would be leading the fight...

Edited, Jun 10th 2009 3:45pm by Tzemesce
#117 Jun 10 2009 at 12:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
This issue is not over just because the latest round of legal challenges failed.
No, it really is. Sorry. This will never be anything more than the mark of a lunatic fringe.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#118 Jun 10 2009 at 12:55 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
gbaji wrote:
The problem is that the phrase "birth certificate" is commonly used, but in this case, the only certificate we have seen is a "Certification of Live Birth", which is not the same thing. In Hawaii at that time, those certifications were simply a record that the person existed and could be obtained by pretty much anyone.

The full long form Birth Certificate includes information such as the hospital where he was born, the signature of the doctor who delivered him, etc. The Certification of Live Birth only proves that Obama was born, is a real person, and his mother was residing in Hawaii at the time she applied for the Certification. To prove that Barack was actually born in the state of Hawaii, the actual long form Birth Certificate would be required and the contents would need to show that he was born in Hawaii and not simply declared to be living in Hawaii (both were "valid" at the time in question, but only one qualifies him to be President).


So far, the only statement about the long form document is that it exists. Which does not tell us what information it contains. What's suspiciously absent from every official statement from every person who has seen the long form document is a statement that the form verifies that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. While I'm perfectly willing to acknowledge that this might just have been an oversight, I and a whole lot of other people would really feel a lot better if someone would simply certify this officially. No one yet has, and until they do, this matter will remain an issue.


They had a whole set of hearings to establish whether McCain was qualified to be President when he ran. Doesn't it seem even a bit strange that there hasn't been a single "official" determination on this? Just challenges and court rulings, but those aren't being made by people who've seen the long form document. The only official on the record statement we have is the one quoted earlier, which only states that a long form certificate exists. Why not go that extra step?...


And no. This issue is not over just because the latest round of legal challenges failed.



First point, please see: http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg
When it says right on there "City, town or location of BIRTH" "Island of BIRTH" and "County of BIRTH" it pretty much says exactly where he was BORN. It is not "of current residence"... it is OF BIRTH. It is true that it does not have hospital name or the signature of the doctor who delivered, however. Not like it matters, as it still is a birth location (cue the "OMG, but you can't prove that they didn't LIE about the birth location from the short version!").

Second point:

FactCheck wrote:
The document is a "certification of birth," also known as a short-form birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes additional information such as birth weight and parents' hometowns. The short form is printed by the state and draws from a database with fewer details. The Hawaii Department of Health's birth record request form does not give the option to request a photocopy of your long-form birth certificate, but their short form has enough information to be acceptable to the State Department. We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer the short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response.


Because what they have done is sufficient? It is accepted by the State Department, has all the information that the government deems necessary. And that the courts deem necessary, since lawsuits about this keep getting dismissed.

Last point, ******* the health director of Hawaii, verifies that Obama was born in Hawaii.
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/11/obama_hawaaianborn_citizen_for.html wrote:
Does this mean Obama was born in Hawaii?

"Yes," said Hawaii Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo, in both email and telephone interviews with the Tribune. "That's what Dr. ****** is saying."


I guess it's as the politifact.org article said:
Quote:
And there's the rub. It is possible that Obama conspired his way to the precipice of the world's biggest job, involving a vast network of people and government agencies over decades of lies. Anything's possible.

But step back and look at the overwhelming evidence to the contrary and your sense of what's reasonable has to take over.


#119 Jun 10 2009 at 1:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
gbaji wrote:
The full long form Birth Certificate includes information such as the hospital where he was born, the signature of the doctor who delivered him, etc.


Varies by state, actually. If what you say were true, that it has to list a hospital and be signed by a doctor, then no child delivered at home by a midwife could be considered a citizen.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#120 Jun 10 2009 at 1:09 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
This issue is not over just because the latest round of legal challenges failed.
No, it really is. Sorry. This will never be anything more than the mark of a lunatic fringe.


You mean the GOP leadership?
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#121 Jun 10 2009 at 1:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Apparently the lunatic who opened fire in the Holocaust museum today was, beyond an insane racist, one of the "We need Obama's birth certificate!" set.

Edited, Jun 10th 2009 4:17pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#122 Jun 10 2009 at 1:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Apparently the lunatic who opened fire in the Holocaust museum today was, beyond an insane racist, one of the "We need Obama's birth certificate!" set.

Edited, Jun 10th 2009 4:17pm by Jophiel


Haha, yeah, I saw that he had some Freeper posts and thought of you.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#123REDACTED, Posted: Jun 10 2009 at 1:41 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) His original birth certificate will never be released. The sad thing is it's not like it matters to half the people. Then again half the people think someone else should pay for their healthcare and welfare.
#124 Jun 10 2009 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
Quote:
What's suspiciously absent from every official statement from every person who has seen the long form document is a statement that the form verifies that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii
No one needs to know his doctor, his birth weight or any other specific information. This is an invasion of privacy. The certificate establishes his place of birth down to the city. Are you saying an official government document is lying? Anyone who takes a baby to Hawaii can get a birth certificate from there? really? Are you fucking insane?

Quote:
The sad thing is it's not like it matters to half the people
The really sad pathetic thing is that it matters to you.

Edited, Jun 10th 2009 4:46pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#125 Jun 10 2009 at 2:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Apparently the lunatic who opened fire in the Holocaust museum today was, beyond an insane racist, one of the "We need Obama's birth certificate!" set.
Haha, yeah, I saw that he had some Freeper posts and thought of you.
More right-wing radical domestic terrorism!

Looks like Napolitano had the right of it!
Varrus wrote:
The sad thing is it's not like it matters to half the people
Heh, "half".

Edited, Jun 10th 2009 5:04pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#126 Jun 10 2009 at 3:16 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Debalic wrote:
So, gbaji, what you're trying to say is that you also do not believe that Obama is a US citizen and is not a legitimate President?


No. At question is not his US citizenship, but whether he is a "natural born citizen", which is a more strict qualification.

Secondly, it's not about what I believe, but that I don't know if he is a natural born citizen. So far, I haven't seen any official who has seen the long form say anything that satisfies me that he was. I don't assume he wasn't, but also don't assume he was. That's the problem.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 215 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (215)