Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

There's a special place in hell...Follow

#127 May 24 2009 at 7:33 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Ambrya wrote:
Some of us actually extend our use of the language beyond the scope of "Donkey Kong."


And some of us have a sense of humour.

Edited, May 24th 2009 11:35pm by Pensive
#128 May 24 2009 at 7:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:

The fact that you can apparently commit immoral actions with impunity doesn't really have anything to do with whether or not they are right.


A legal execution is not immoral in the eyes of the law. You consider it immoral, sure. I, and many others would consider it justice. Feeding, entertaining, clothing, and housing some murderer in a standard of luxury that many of our poorer citizens are denied is immoral in my oppinon.

Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:

There is no reason we should have to choose between giving human rights to criminals or giving civil rights to children. If our country is in that bad of @#%^ing shape then we need a massive overhaul of both systems.

If you can't fix someone then you remove them from the rest of the population as humanely as possible. You keep them in prison for the rest of their lives and give them adequate physical and mental stimulation in accordance with them being humans. I really don't understand why respecting human rights is controversial.


yes, both systems do need a massive overhaul. And there isn't some magic inifinite pot of money available to adequatly fund everything. Prison isn't supposed to be fun. Prison should be a horrible experiance designed to ensure that those being in prison have no desire to ever return. Let's worry about providing adequate physical and mental stimulation for our citizens before prisons. Why should some murderer in prison get free education when we can't provide the means for most of our non-imprisoned youth to go to college?
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#129 May 24 2009 at 8:01 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
Feeding, entertaining, clothing, and housing some murderer in a standard of luxury that many of our poorer citizens are denied is immoral in my oppinon.


If you have to cut off the legs to save the body then fine, do it, but don't pretend like you can still walk afterward. Prisoners are humans. Humans deserve certain rights purely in virtue of being human. Will they get them? I don't know. Do they deserve them? Yes.

Quote:
Why should some murderer in prison get free education when we can't provide the means for most of our non-imprisoned youth to go to college?


I was thinking more like... letting them read books and do crosswords and sh*t.

All citizens deserve a free education. They also probably deserve free housing and a food stipend. Prisoners aren't exactly citizens though, so they should probably only be given a standard education if there is a surplus of funds, or if the teachers are working as volunteers or something.

Quote:
A legal execution is not immoral in the eyes of the law.


A dude going up to you, personally, with a ticking bomb scenario, is hardly a legal execution.

Edited, May 25th 2009 12:02am by Pensive
#130 May 24 2009 at 9:22 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Ambrya wrote:
There's a special place in hell for a mother who smothers her sleeping child.
No there isn't, hell doesn't exist.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#131 May 24 2009 at 9:32 PM Rating: Excellent
bsphil wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
There's a special place in hell for a mother who smothers her sleeping child.
No there isn't, hell doesn't exist.
All right, who erased New Jersey?
#132 May 24 2009 at 9:38 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
MDenham wrote:
bsphil wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
There's a special place in hell for a mother who smothers her sleeping child.
No there isn't, hell doesn't exist.
All right, who erased New Jersey?
I slept in the back of a pickup truck in New Jersey once. Not nearly as bad as I thought, lol.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#133 May 25 2009 at 12:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:


A dude going up to you, personally, with a ticking bomb scenario, is hardly a legal execution.


I was more inferring an electric chair button or something. Regardless, my intent with the "legitimate" phrasing of that was that it would hypotetically be a legal execution.

Regarding human rights, in most cases, yes, people do have rights. In certain extereme cases, the rights of the people they intend to murder should outweigh their need to exist. The second you decide me and mine have no right to live because of some twisted murderous serial killer urge, you forfeit the right to breath.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#134 May 25 2009 at 1:08 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Well... stuff happens in the real world. You can still defend yourself. Sometimes you just have to make a choice between pacifism and murder. It's not like I would hesitate to murder someone that was threatening my family or friends, but I'd still feel really bad after the fact and if they had survivors I'd probably be trying to comfort them.

Screenshot


Ethics are arbitrary and invented. All norms are. Realizing that, I'm not comfortable telling another person that they should be punished for anything, but sometimes we have to simply because there isn't any other choice because criminals cause so much harm to people. However, because we have recognized causing harm as something to avoid, we can't conscientiously cause undue harm to prisoners either.

You can still imprison people, but the process should be absolutely uniform, impartial, and as least sadistic and as least vengeful as possible.

Universal compassion isn't allowing an emotion into an argument that decries emotional judgments. It's simply the principle that glues the entire chain of reasoning together, and even though it's just as arbitrary as wanton vengeance, I believe that compassion leads to much more happiness and peace.

Screenshot
#135 May 25 2009 at 1:43 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

I support Pensive's arguments in this thread via green arrows.

#136 May 25 2009 at 6:33 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
Serious criminals should just be dumped on an island to fend for themselves. Out of sight out of mind. They're free to live their lives however they can manage, on their island, away from us.
#137 May 25 2009 at 6:48 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Superjail!
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#138 May 25 2009 at 8:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Sometimes you just have to thin the herd.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#139 May 25 2009 at 9:52 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Sometimes you just have to thin the herd.


With buckshot.
#140 May 25 2009 at 6:00 PM Rating: Good
Ken Burton's Reject
*****
12,834 posts
Yodabunny wrote:
Serious criminals should just be dumped on an island to fend for themselves. Out of sight out of mind. They're free to live their lives however they can manage, on their island, away from us.
Did they already try this?
____________________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/pawkeshup
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/pawkeshup
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
The idea of old school is way more interesting than the reality
#141 May 25 2009 at 6:03 PM Rating: Good
The convicts sent to Australia were not left alone, though.
#142 May 25 2009 at 6:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Given our high incarceration rate and the fact that among other industrialized countries, we are most likely to execute and yet here we are in the US, still with our high crime rate, stricter punishments aren't gonna do all that much to curb serious crime. That and plucking one story out of the paper and talking about how it means you should change the law isn't a meaningful exercise.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#143 May 25 2009 at 9:01 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Yodabunny wrote:
Serious criminals should just be dumped on an island to fend for themselves. Out of sight out of mind. They're free to live their lives however they can manage, on their island, away from us.


That didn't work the first time.
#144 May 25 2009 at 11:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
You forgot the second part:

Quote:
The island should contain hungry velociraptors.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#145 May 25 2009 at 11:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Warchief Annabella wrote:
Given our high incarceration rate and the fact that among other industrialized countries, we are most likely to execute and yet here we are in the US, still with our high crime rate, stricter punishments aren't gonna do all that much to curb serious crime. That and plucking one story out of the paper and talking about how it means you should change the law isn't a meaningful exercise.


Executed criminals are 98% less likely to reoffend...

And the other 2% are usually covered under the secret Nixon zombie exemption act of 1968 after Abe Lincoln came back.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#146 May 26 2009 at 2:02 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,229 posts
We've been over this a dozen times. Prison clearly doesn't work, so you're stuck between a rock and a hard place. Trying to please everyone by locking people up isn't winning the war on crime, yet executing them runs the risk of getting it wrong.

Isn't it time for a space prison?

And Kavekk is a stupid ****.
#147 May 26 2009 at 2:39 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
And Kavekk is a stupid @#%^.


You can say fuck
#148 May 26 2009 at 3:23 AM Rating: Good
Goggy wrote:
We've been over this a dozen times. Prison clearly doesn't work, so you're stuck between a rock and a hard place. Trying to please everyone by locking people up isn't winning the war on crime, yet executing them runs the risk of getting it wrong.

Isn't it time for a space prison?

And Kavekk is a stupid @#%^.


Where's your documentation to back up your claim?
#149 May 26 2009 at 4:04 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,229 posts
For you being a stupid ****?

Or the other stuff?
#150 May 26 2009 at 4:38 AM Rating: Good
The former.
#151 May 26 2009 at 4:38 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,229 posts
On evidence it's not required m'lud.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 243 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (243)