Smasharoo wrote:
No it doesn't. Gender identity formation actually starts at a very, very young age and definitely before elementary school.
This is a complete and total guess about a subjective social construct. I'm not even sure what it's supposed to mean; that very, very young children who barely understand the gender roles they observe identify with one or the other? Ridiculous. It's an interesting tapdance, this postmodern feminist argument that little girls like who like to wear dresses, play with dolls, have tea parties and hate math do so because of societal pressure, but that little boys who do such things are driven by the formation of their gender identity, presumably genetically determined.
Sexual orientation, sure; there's evidence there. Gender identity in children? There isn't.
Gender identity is not the same thing as adoption of socially prescribed gender roles. Seeing yourself as female is not equivalent to seeing yourself as someone who plays with dolls and wear dresses. There is a difference between a little boy who wears dresses and sees themselves as a little boy and a little boy who wears dresses and identifies as a girl and it happens early.
To a large extent, the implication that someone is born with a sexual orientation but not any gender identity, doesn't make all that much sense since it means that someone is relating to the world in a gendered way but never applying it to a sense of self.
Edited, May 19th 2009 9:14pm by Annabella