Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

How old before you know you're a boy or a girl?Follow

#52 May 19 2009 at 5:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

No it doesn't. Gender identity formation actually starts at a very, very young age and definitely before elementary school.


This is a complete and total guess about a subjective social construct. I'm not even sure what it's supposed to mean; that very, very young children who barely understand the gender roles they observe identify with one or the other? Ridiculous. It's an interesting tapdance, this postmodern feminist argument that little girls like who like to wear dresses, play with dolls, have tea parties and hate math do so because of societal pressure, but that little boys who do such things are driven by the formation of their gender identity, presumably genetically determined.

Sexual orientation, sure; there's evidence there. Gender identity in children? There isn't.




Gender identity is not the same thing as adoption of socially prescribed gender roles. Seeing yourself as female is not equivalent to seeing yourself as someone who plays with dolls and wear dresses. There is a difference between a little boy who wears dresses and sees themselves as a little boy and a little boy who wears dresses and identifies as a girl and it happens early.

To a large extent, the implication that someone is born with a sexual orientation but not any gender identity, doesn't make all that much sense since it means that someone is relating to the world in a gendered way but never applying it to a sense of self.



Edited, May 19th 2009 9:14pm by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#53 May 19 2009 at 9:49 PM Rating: Excellent
I don't have a problem with it. However, if this was my child, I'd have a huge problem with a judge telling me I had to let my daughter get a sex change.

Not because I'd be personally against it, just not at that age. A 12 year old probably hasn't even had a sexual experience yet & having to go through life at that age with a mutilated psuedo-***** is just cruel.

Hormone therapy? Perhaps. But most likely It'd be a decision, I would support, that they would have to make themselves when they're 18.

Edited, May 20th 2009 1:50am by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#54 May 19 2009 at 10:39 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,086 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Not because I'd be personally against it, just not at that age.]


From the article it seems they are just stopping her development into a woman, not actually making her into a man until she is 18.

Isn't asking someone to wait till they are 18 and their body has developed into the incorrect gender rather like offering a dead person life insurance .. a little late in the day?
#55REDACTED, Posted: May 19 2009 at 11:07 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Man wishes to be every thing. I'd say jealousy led to many an invention. Jealous of birds? Build a plane. Jealous of speedy animals? Car.
#56 May 19 2009 at 11:48 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
I don't have a problem with it. However, if this was my child, I'd have a huge problem with a judge telling me I had to let my daughter get a sex change.


Uh huh

And making him wait until he has boobs pop out of his chest and blood flowing from his uterus sounds like a better solution... how?

If the child wants the change, then you have a responsibility as a parent to listen to them and consider it. You do not have a responsibility to refuse them on the basis of some reactionary derisive ******** about their age. "Oh noooo; they're too young to make that kind of decision" is a fantastic way of completely dismissing your child's opinion by lying to yourself that you actually have their best interests in mind. It's also a pretty fast way to alienate the child.

Not to mention that linking their decision making ability to whether or not they've ****** yet is kind of ridiculous.

In any case, the point is that it's not your choice in the first place. It's the child's. Of course asking parents to admit that they aren't omniscient with regards to the welfare of their children is possibly the most pointless exercise in existence, but it passes the time.
#57REDACTED, Posted: May 20 2009 at 12:01 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Last time I checked, not many 8 year old girls have boobs and/or blood flowing from their uterus..es...
#58 May 20 2009 at 12:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Like I said, I'd be ok with hormone therapy. But 12 is a little too early for genital mutilation, in my opinion.

I was a little older when I discovered ************ & I have <3'd my ***** ever since. Despite the fact that she identifies as being a man, I wouldn't want my daughter/son to go through life without knowing what a fully functioning sexual organ feels like as opposed to the psuedo-***** she would prefer to live with.

As I said in a previous thread on this subject, I'm fine with someone identifying as a member of the opposite sex. But the whole sex change operation is a CHOICE (as opposed to the gender identity, which I don't believe is). A choice that needs to be made by her, after she's matured a bit.

And a choice I would support either way.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#59 May 20 2009 at 12:42 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
How is a "girl in a boys body" different from "a girl who likes boy activities"?

Even if it does turn into a sexual thing where she prefers women over men, I'd still say it's society making her believe she'd have to be a man to actively enjoy the things she feels like enjoying.

Unless she one day decides she'd much rather be putting a ***** inside things instead of having a ***** or ***** like structure inserted in her ******, leave what you were created with alone, work with what ya got for cryin' out loud.


Did you notice where I already asked these exact same questions?

I don't have to comprehend what trans-people feel like to respect their agency and desire to be a different sex, or gender, or whatever the hell weird middle ground they are reporting about between the two. It would be nice to comprehend, but it's anything but necessary. Now, until I'm at the stage of comprehension as opposed to the stage of making money and getting laid (hahahahaha yeah right) I'm going to give trans-people the benefit of the doubt.
#60 May 20 2009 at 12:45 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
Like I said, I'd be ok with hormone therapy. But 12 is a little too early for genital mutilation, in my opinion.


Oh well yeah... that wasn't really clear to me. The person in your article wasn't able to receive that operation until he was 18 anyway though, so I'm not sure what your beef is?
#61 May 20 2009 at 12:47 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Oh well yeah... that wasn't really clear to me. The person in your article wasn't able to receive that operation until he was 18 anyway though, so I'm not sure what your beef is?


And that wasn't clear to me. It said "Sex Change" & I thought the whole shebang.

(Pun intended)
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#62 May 20 2009 at 1:11 AM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
(Pun intended)

DIAF.
#63 May 20 2009 at 1:24 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,590 posts
This sort of thing always confuses me.

When I was a kid, for several years I disdained all "girly" things. I was interested mainly in dinosaurs, volcanoes, and model rocketry, and a little bit after that, Pokemon. I would have nothing to do with the color pink, and I would freak out if anyone tried to use a "cute" version of my name. I did play house, since most of my friends were girls, but I was always the daddy, and I wanted to grow up and marry my best friend (another girl). Little girls acting like little boys seem to get a lot more acceptance than the other way around, though--no one seemed to care, and certainly no one gave me a hard time for "acting like a boy". My parents encouraged my interests (well, except for the wanting to marry my best friend part--they just kind of rolled their eyes at that one), never classified anything I did as a "boy" or "girl" activity, and eventually I grew out of it (can't really think of a better way to describe it).

While it seems like the parents in the article are being very accepting, I can't help but feel like they might have been responsible for the child wanting to be a girl. The article said that they restricted some of his activities to the home, and he had to dress differently when he went outside. If the kid hadn't been taught that some things were "girl" things and some things were "boy" things, and that it wasn't okay for a boy to enjoy "girl" stuff in public, maybe he wouldn't feel that he had to be a girl to keep enjoying his hobbies.
#64 May 20 2009 at 2:51 AM Rating: Good
Allegory wrote:
DIAF.


No need to be so hot-headed.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#65 May 20 2009 at 6:52 AM Rating: Good
***
2,813 posts
Quote:
New varus?

...and it's scholar?

This forum isn't doing it's part to normalize immoral/deviant **** slaps fast enough.

He made a Monday thread and a single inoffensive post about his garden. Apparently that's enough to get you rated to scholar when you've set the bar that low for yourself.
#66 May 20 2009 at 6:59 AM Rating: Good
kyla,

Quote:
He made a Monday thread and a single inoffensive post about his garden. Apparently that's enough to get you rated to scholar when you've set the bar that low for yourself.


lmao...Amusing my rating bothers you.

#67 May 20 2009 at 7:01 AM Rating: Decent
*****
12,846 posts
Lady isyris wrote:
This sort of thing always confuses me.

If the kid hadn't been taught that some things were "girl" things and some things were "boy" things, and that it wasn't okay for a boy to enjoy "girl" stuff in public, maybe he wouldn't feel that he had to be a girl to keep enjoying his hobbies.


Gender identification involves much more than "sex designated" items. I think the confusion for some posters like yourself is "sex" and "gender". Sex is an ascribed status that we are all born with and doesn't change regardless of our achieved status of "gender". (if you are born XY, you remain so even if your plumbing changes, your DNA does not.)

Being a tomboy isn't the same as being a trans-man.
#68 May 20 2009 at 7:12 AM Rating: Good
***
2,813 posts
pubis,

Quote:
lmao...Amusing my rating bothers you.


It doesn't bother me at all. I even rated up your Monday post. It felt like rewarding a little kid when he manages not to sh*t his pants.
#69 May 20 2009 at 7:19 AM Rating: Good
Kyla,

I've been at this site for years now and am probably the only one to never rate anyone at all. If people don't want to read my posts that's fine.

Oh and if this,

Quote:
Apparently that's enough to get you rated to scholar when you've set the bar that low for yourself.


isn't whining I don't know what is.



Edited, May 20th 2009 11:27am by publiusvarus
#70 May 20 2009 at 7:22 AM Rating: Default
***
3,229 posts
I'm confused. Did you mean winning or whining? Because that would change your sentence completely.
#71 May 20 2009 at 7:42 AM Rating: Good
***
2,590 posts
niobia wrote:
Lady isyris wrote:
This sort of thing always confuses me.

If the kid hadn't been taught that some things were "girl" things and some things were "boy" things, and that it wasn't okay for a boy to enjoy "girl" stuff in public, maybe he wouldn't feel that he had to be a girl to keep enjoying his hobbies.


Gender identification involves much more than "sex designated" items. I think the confusion for some posters like yourself is "sex" and "gender". Sex is an ascribed status that we are all born with and doesn't change regardless of our achieved status of "gender". (if you are born XY, you remain so even if your plumbing changes, your DNA does not.)

Being a tomboy isn't the same as being a trans-man.


What I would like to know is how a child knows the difference. If I'd been told to either stop playing with rockets or identify myself as male, I would have decided to be a boy simply because things that go whoosh are fun.
#72 May 20 2009 at 7:46 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Lady isyris wrote:
niobia wrote:
Lady isyris wrote:
This sort of thing always confuses me.

If the kid hadn't been taught that some things were "girl" things and some things were "boy" things, and that it wasn't okay for a boy to enjoy "girl" stuff in public, maybe he wouldn't feel that he had to be a girl to keep enjoying his hobbies.


Gender identification involves much more than "sex designated" items. I think the confusion for some posters like yourself is "sex" and "gender". Sex is an ascribed status that we are all born with and doesn't change regardless of our achieved status of "gender". (if you are born XY, you remain so even if your plumbing changes, your DNA does not.)

Being a tomboy isn't the same as being a trans-man.


What I would like to know is how a child knows the difference. If I'd been told to either stop playing with rockets or identify myself as male, I would have decided to be a boy simply because things that go whoosh are fun.
Precisely what I've been asking all along. No one answers beyond saying "being a girl is more than dolls and dresses" and leaving it at that.
#73 May 20 2009 at 7:50 AM Rating: Decent
*****
12,846 posts
Lady isyris wrote:
niobia wrote:
Lady isyris wrote:
This sort of thing always confuses me.

If the kid hadn't been taught that some things were "girl" things and some things were "boy" things, and that it wasn't okay for a boy to enjoy "girl" stuff in public, maybe he wouldn't feel that he had to be a girl to keep enjoying his hobbies.


Gender identification involves much more than "sex designated" items. I think the confusion for some posters like yourself is "sex" and "gender". Sex is an ascribed status that we are all born with and doesn't change regardless of our achieved status of "gender". (if you are born XY, you remain so even if your plumbing changes, your DNA does not.)

Being a tomboy isn't the same as being a trans-man.


What I would like to know is how a child knows the difference. If I'd been told to either stop playing with rockets or identify myself as male, I would have decided to be a boy simply because things that go whoosh are fun.


Anna is the clinician with Nexa as our Resident Sociologist. My knowledge in the matter is that what there is a larger portion of our personalities and gender roles that is genetic as opposed to being conditioned.

Think about sexuality. A child knows pretty early on what "flavor" is to their preference. What seems to be changing is our antiquated conservative based belief system that is easily offended at the mere idea that homosexuality is normal and gender is fluid.
#74 May 20 2009 at 7:58 AM Rating: Good
Lady isyris wrote:
What I would like to know is how a child knows the difference. If I'd been told to either stop playing with rockets or identify myself as male, I would have decided to be a boy simply because things that go whoosh are fun.


I don't understand where you get the idea that this is being said at all.
#75 May 20 2009 at 8:09 AM Rating: Decent
*****
12,846 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Lady isyris wrote:
What I would like to know is how a child knows the difference. If I'd been told to either stop playing with rockets or identify myself as male, I would have decided to be a boy simply because things that go whoosh are fun.


I don't understand where you get the idea that this is being said at all.


sex, sexual preference and gender roles can be confusing. I liken it to trying to remember algebra formulas for factoring. Unfortunately, sexual preference and gender roles are more fluid than Algebra :/

I think it may more be the way we were raised and educated (or uneducated) that may contribute to our lack of understanding. The American culture is still quite conservative.

/edit
I have to say that I appreciate that lysis (sp?) and ash are at least asking and want to understand "why".

Edited, May 20th 2009 9:11am by niobia
#76 May 20 2009 at 8:26 AM Rating: Good
***
2,590 posts
Quote:
Her family has allowed the child to wear dresses and female clothing in their west Omaha home, but until recently, she had to change into boy clothes for her brother’s baseball games, church or any outing outside the house.

“Now I can wear nail polish, get rid of all my boy clothes and not worry about that name,” the child said.


This was what really stuck out to me. The child does indeed identify certain clothing as boy clothes or girl clothes, and has not been allowed to wear "girl clothes" outside the home. If he had been, I think I'd be more willing to accept him as actually transgender, but because of the parents' restrictions it seems like he could easily be insisting on being a girl simply so that he will be allowed to wear "girl" clothes and do "girl" things in public as well as in private. I'm not disputing that he will be happier and less stressed now that he does not have to pretend to be a different person in public, I just question the reasoning behind the decision.

"My child is transgender" sounds a lot better than "I couldn't deal with my son wanting to wear dresses so I decided he was really a girl".
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 650 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (650)