Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

The Bible versus the KoranFollow

#77 May 19 2009 at 8:05 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,601 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Xsarus wrote:
This is not a surprise, and everyone has always known this. There was no conspiracy to keep it hushed up.
I think Paulsol gets his theology from Dan Brown novels.
I love it when someone finds out about a translation controversy or something and goes OMG CONSPIRACY Smiley: tinfoilhat

It especially ironic considering the amazing level of scholarship theologians used to have. In the past if you studied the bible you were fluent in all the original languages, compared with today where you hope for some understanding of Greek, and Hebrew if you're lucky.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#78 May 19 2009 at 11:28 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
It especially ironic considering the amazing level of scholarship theologians used to have. In the past if you studied the bible you were fluent in all the original languages, compared with today where you hope for some understanding of Greek, and Hebrew if you're lucky.


um...

Nearly every theologian I know understands at least the languages of their specialty. Most religious studies people do too, unless they deal with mainly NRMs.
#79 May 19 2009 at 11:30 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
I've never read past the the first 10 pages of a Dan Brown novel in my life.

Xsarus:

Quote:
You really shouldn't talk about things you know nothing about.


Oh really? And you are basing your intimate knowledge of events from 2000 years ago on what exactly? Oh yeah...the Bible! Well I concede my position to your far superior knowledge derived from accounts written decades, if not centuries after the events. I guess unquestioning trust in others is part of the requirments tho.....

Quote:
The reason Christians generally believe in the virgin birth is because the new testament describes it as such.


Good on them! Proves absolutely f'uck all tho. See above.

Quote:
OMG CONSPIRACY


I wouldnt call organised religions a conspiracy. More an example of mass self delusion. Wich is fine, if you feel the need. I can understand why you would get all defensive about it tho.

In fact, I would really be a worried Messiah if I was preparing for my second coming tho. 'Cos the minute the poor bugger announces him/herself the religious world would instantly go into paroxysms of disbelief and rejection and do anything and everything to suppress his existence.

AmiRitE?
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#80 May 19 2009 at 11:37 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
paulsol wrote:
In fact, I would really be a worried Messiah if I was preparing for my second coming tho. 'Cos the minute the poor bugger announces him/herself the religious world would instantly go into paroxysms of disbelief and rejection and do anything and everything to suppress his existence.

AmiRitE?
He'll have to float around in the air with a halo, and cause people to start sprouting wings and vanishing. Otherwise he's most likely prison-bound, or a dead man, or both.
#81 May 19 2009 at 11:37 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Paulsol is one of the selected few that has pierced the veil of Maya.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#82 May 19 2009 at 11:41 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
paulsol wrote:
Quote:
You really shouldn't talk about things you know nothing about.
Oh really? And you are basing your intimate knowledge of events from 2000 years ago on what exactly? Oh yeah...the Bible! Well I concede my position to your far superior knowledge derived from accounts written decades, if not centuries after the events. I guess unquestioning trust in others is part of the requirments tho.....
Right, but we're not discussing whether or not Christianity is valid, I was just pointing out that you know nothing about theology. If you're discussing theology or hermeneutics, it behooves you to actually know something about the subject. Of course I'm well aware this is too much to ask from you in this particular area.

paulsol wrote:
Quote:
The reason Christians generally believe in the virgin birth is because the new testament describes it as such.
Good on them! Proves absolutely f'uck all tho. See above.
Again, this is the part where you are wrong about theology. Either re-read my post or read Jophiels to see why.

paulsol wrote:
Quote:
OMG CONSPIRACY
I wouldnt call organised religions a conspiracy. More an example of mass self delusion. Wich is fine, if you feel the need. I can understand why you would get all defensive about it tho.

In fact, I would really be a worried Messiah if I was preparing for my second coming tho. 'Cos the minute the poor bugger announces him/herself the religious world would instantly go into paroxysms of disbelief and rejection and do anything and everything to suppress his existence.

AmiRitE?
The conspiracy part was in referal to your absurd claim that somehow people figured out the translation of that one word in the 60's. Your reading comprehension is at an all time low here.

Edited, May 19th 2009 2:49pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#83 May 19 2009 at 11:59 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Xsarus wrote:
Right, but we're not discussing whether or not Christianity is valid, I was just pointing out that you know nothing about theology. If you're discussing theology or hermeneutics, it behooves you to actually have a clue about what the fuck you're talking about.


So, unless I am a practicing student of theology, I'm not allowed to have an opinion on religion? Ok. Gotcha. Religion of tolerance my *****


Quote:
The conspiracy part was in referal to your absurd claim that somehow people figured out the translation of that one word in the 60's. Your reading comprehension is at an all time low here.


Absurd claim!!1111eleventy fu'ck!ng one!!11!!1

You accuse me of making absurd claims??? Have you even read the bible?? I was taking the **** ffs

If anyone is making absurd claims in relation to our state of being around here, its not me Bucko!
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#84 May 19 2009 at 12:06 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
[quote]So, unless I am a practicing student of theology, I'm not allowed to have an opinion on religion? Ok. Gotcha. Religion of tolerance my *************

Of course you can...

It's nice if your opinion isn't a lot of unoriginal **** that a 12 year old could devise though.

You've exhibited blind hate and an almost willful ignorance of the subject. You don't seem to want to learn, or even listen, to anything good anyone has to say about religious beliefs, and when you go into a discussion with that attitude, you really can't expect that anyone is going to take you seriously when you start being all derisive and dismissive.
#85 May 19 2009 at 12:45 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
paulsol wrote:
[quote=Xsarus]Right, but we're not discussing whether or not Christianity is valid, I was just pointing out that you know nothing about theology. If you're discussing theology or hermeneutics, it behooves you to actually have a clue about what the fuck you're talking about.
So, unless I am a practicing student of theology, I'm not allowed to have an opinion on religion? Ok. Gotcha. Religion of tolerance my ************************* of course you can have an opinion. I'd expect you to have an opinion in fact. And I welcome you sharing the opinion. I was just correcting the misinformation you had picked up somewhere about the whole virgin thing.

Having an opinion on religion is not the same as discussing interpretation of scripture. You have to have some knowledge about it before you can even try to understand it. You can't really have a point about hermeneutics unless you know what hermeneutics means. Do you? It'd be like me making an interpretive point about the constitution without ever having read the thing, or knowing anything about it. I do realize that's SOP around here, but still, I get to point it out when it happens.

I'd like to think you're trolling, and misreading my posts on purpose, but given your posting history I can't be sure. are you?

Edited, May 19th 2009 4:01pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#86 May 19 2009 at 1:09 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
You've exhibited blind hate and an almost willful ignorance of the subject. You don't seem to want to learn, or even listen, to anything good anyone has to say about religious beliefs,


First. I dont hate anyone or anything. I'm a little surprised, Pensive, that you would apply that word to me.

Wilfull ignorance?? Hmmm.... I spent 17 years travelling the world pretty non-stop for one reason or another (Independantly, not i the military or an NGO) and was keen to experience as much as I possibly could.

That included spending time with followers of Islam and Judaism and of course Christianity in the Middle East. Hard core Catholicism and the various Mayan beliefs in Central America, Hinduism, Bhudism, Jainism, Sikhism and animists in various parts of Asia, two 5 day Kala Chakra meditations in the company of the Dalai Lama in the high Himalaya, as well as some interesting times spent in the company of Evangelicals in the USA and East Africa, as well of the usual run of the mill Christians and wotnots of various parts of Europe and its various outposts around the world. Some of the Temples, shrines, churches synagogues and mosques I've been to have stunned me to tears with their beauty and sheer presence. But then again so have some of the natural sights of the world as well.

So while I may not have studied Christianity or any other religion in any sort of formal way, I have spent enough time in the company of followers of various religions to know that, on the whole, they are as fine a group of people you could ever hope to meet.

But if there is one thing that pisses me off, its the literal "Holier than Thou" attitude that makes people spew rubbish such as "its in the bible/koran, and thats a historicaly factual book,'cos my preacher/iman/rabbi told me so yup, nyuk nyuk".

I've listened. Plenty. And with the occasional notable exception, conversations about religion, especially in the 'West', often devolve into an aggressive/ paranoid defence that ends up with someone saying something along the line of 'you dont want to understand, because you hate us'.

If that is the best someone can come up with in defence of their belief system, then why should I be impressed with it? Why shouldn't I take the **** and laugh? Its all it deserves.

If on the other hand an individual wants to show me why they believe, why they need to believe, in their own words, from the heart, as it were, then I will respect their beliefs.

I may not agree with them, but I will respect them.



____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#87 May 19 2009 at 1:12 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
paulsol wrote:
First. I dont hate anyone or anything. I'm a little surprised, Pensive, that you would apply that word to me.
Maybe you should reread some of your posts Smiley: lol
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#88 May 19 2009 at 1:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
paulsol wrote:
First. I dont hate anyone or anything.
EXCEPT THE JEWS!!!! Smiley: mad
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#89 May 19 2009 at 3:42 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
But if there is one thing that pisses me off, its the literal "Holier than Thou" attitude that makes people spew rubbish such as "its in the bible/koran, and thats a historicaly factual book,'cos my preacher/iman/rabbi told me so yup, nyuk nyuk".


Has anyone?
#90 May 19 2009 at 3:52 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I get that, but you don't need to be an Islamic scholar to convert to Islam


No, but you'd hear the Koran in Arabic, pretty much all over the world, and there would be some expectation that you'd learn some Arabic as part of your practice of the faith. It *really is* more significant than in most religions.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#91 May 19 2009 at 3:54 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:


Has anyone?


Perhaps you need to get out more?
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#92 May 19 2009 at 3:55 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

So while I may not have studied Christianity or any other religion in any sort of formal way, I have spent enough time in the company of followers of various religions to know that, on the whole, they are as fine a group of people you could ever hope to meet.


Really? I've never noticed any lesser level of douchebagery in any religious group. Or secular group, really. The douchebag distribution really seems pretty level to me.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#93 May 19 2009 at 4:00 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Smasharoo wrote:


Really? I've never noticed any lesser level of douchebagery in any religious group. Or secular group, really. The douchebag distribution really seems pretty level to me.



You'll be accused of blind hate and wilful ignorance if you carry on like that.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#94 May 19 2009 at 4:26 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
Perhaps you need to get out more?


So you're just ranting at people about a problem that everyone recognizes in the world, but no one has identified with in the thread?


Quote:
You'll be accused of blind hate and wilful ignorance if you carry on like that.


The difference between blind hate and comic derision is that one of them actually addresses the things that present company says.
#95 May 19 2009 at 4:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Really? I've never noticed any lesser level of douchebagery in any religious group. Or secular group, really. The douchebag distribution really seems pretty level to me.

Jews are too neurotic and whiny to be considered "douchebags." I know because I saw a Woody Allen movie once.

#96 May 19 2009 at 4:37 PM Rating: Good
****
6,858 posts
trickybeck wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
Really? I've never noticed any lesser level of douchebagery in any religious group. Or secular group, really. The douchebag distribution really seems pretty level to me.

Jews are too neurotic and whiny to be considered "douchebags." I know because I saw a Woody Allen movie once.



Speaking of neurotic Jews and Woody Allen movies, is there anything more perfect than Larry David starring in one?
#97 May 19 2009 at 4:39 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
paulsol wrote:
So while I may not have studied Christianity or any other religion in any sort of formal way, I have spent enough time in the company of followers of various religions to know that, on the whole, they are as fine a group of people you could ever hope to meet.


It's interesting to me, that your own personal experiences produce the preceding paragraph, but then you follow it up with this:

Quote:
But if there is one thing that pisses me off, its the literal "Holier than Thou" attitude that makes people spew rubbish such as "its in the bible/koran, and thats a historicaly factual book,'cos my preacher/iman/rabbi told me so yup, nyuk nyuk".


I'm curious. How many people spewing this rubbish have you actually encountered in your life? Not "heard about", or "read about", but actually encountered on the street, in a church, or in any other day to day situation?

My experience is that "Religion Bashing" using the argument about blind faith and spewing rubbish occurs vastly more often than the very thing they're complaining about. Heck. You can see it in this thread. How many posts include anyone insisting on some literal translation of the Bible? How often have you *ever* ran into that on this forum at all? Sure. Occasionally someone will post a wince-worthy religiously fueled diatribe, but at a quick guess I'd say those posts are outnumbered a hundred to one by those attacking religion in general because of people who have that "holier than though" attitude.


You're arguing against a religious strawman of your own creation I think. Heck. Your own experiences kinda indicate that those holier than though folks just aren't that significant in terms of total religious population. So why focus so much dislike towards religion in general based on just that one subgroup?

Edited, May 19th 2009 5:40pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#98 May 19 2009 at 4:39 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Speaking of neurotic Jews and Woody Allen movies, is there anything more perfect than Larry David starring in one?


If David Schwimmer were the love interest?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#99 May 19 2009 at 4:41 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

My experience is that "Religion Bashing" using the argument about blind faith and spewing rubbish occurs vastly more often than the very thing they're complaining about.


No it isn't. Your experience is that you assume this to be the case, likely because you live in San Diego and not Plains Georgia.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#100 May 19 2009 at 5:41 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

My experience is that "Religion Bashing" using the argument about blind faith and spewing rubbish occurs vastly more often than the very thing they're complaining about.


No it isn't. Your experience is that you assume this to be the case, likely because you live in San Diego and not Plains Georgia.


So what? There are 1.3 million people living in San Diego, compared to 637 people living in Plains Georgia. My experiences with regard to the rate at which religious folks spout such things compared to how often other people rail against religious folks spouting such things would seem to be vastly more representative.

Don't you agree?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#101 May 20 2009 at 3:46 PM Rating: Good
****
5,311 posts
Gbaji wrote:
Quote:
Smasharoo wrote:

Gbaji wrote:
My experience is that "Religion Bashing" using the argument about blind faith and spewing rubbish occurs vastly more often than the very thing they're complaining about.


No it isn't. Your experience is that you assume this to be the case, likely because you live in San Diego and not Plains Georgia.



So what? There are 1.3 million people living in San Diego, compared to 637 people living in Plains Georgia. My experiences with regard to the rate at which religious folks spout such things compared to how often other people rail against religious folks spouting such things would seem to be vastly more representative.

Don't you agree?


Depends on where your daily routine takes you. When I rode the bus to work downtown & regularly strolled through the skyways and down the city sidewalks, bombardment of religious diatribes & invitations to church were commonplace events. Now I live in the boondocks where it's a little more internalized.

Edited, May 20th 2009 6:47pm by Yanari
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 259 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (259)