Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

WARNING: Rape Cyborz text. NSFWFollow

#1 May 13 2009 at 9:35 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
My question to other Asylum posters, is, not whether you'd rate this down, not whether you think other Asylumites would rate this down, but whether this sort of thing ought to be allowed to be posted in the Asylum at all. I bring this up to you today specifically in light of the TOS rules review going on at the moment. It might help you clarify your ideas on where the lines ought to be, or it might simply be grandiose attention whoring on my part.


Aripyanfar wrote:
Nixnot wrote:
**** SEX ******** FROM ZIONIST CHILD BEATERS



Thread now belongs in the Asylum, and I win.


You aren't even trying to get it moved.

That flashing jagged silver Star of David beats steelily against a bitter enraged heart that cannot hold love, that tosses it out of the bed before the sweat has dried, that will never accept a **** inside because it knows that it will eat it's own children even before they're old enough to cower in wide-eyed pulse-racing throat-choked terror before it, let alone old enough to grow up into warped copies of their poisonous mother, that sneering, snarling, wealthier-than-thou, smarter-than-thou, and God knows better-than-thou ***** who will clench you by the ear, NixNot, and shove you against the headboard and insert her frozen fist-wide and forearm length black strap-on up your **** with such speed it tears even your soggy gaping ****, making it drip blood down her thighs as she lunges over and over into you with such force and speed that your ****** tears and splinters a little with each hissing grunting shriek of triumph clarioning in the air above you while your bellows of pain muffle themselves impotently into the headboard your face is mashed into, your neck cracking, your lungs choking and labouring to gasp air past the clots of snot and tears and blood pouring back down your sinuses and throat, the bed crashing with every thrust, your face bruising, your ********* torsioning, your stomach knotting, and just before the back of your head clenches with unbearable nausea to pour your vile disgust and pain forth in acidic vomit your swollen prostate betrays you utterly and your body goes into a heated, prickling, paralyzing, pulsing, arching contortion as your ********* clench in a throbbing aching frenzy that drives an outpouring of putrid stinking sticky ***** out of you in gouts and fountains that wet you in your own shame from your nipples to your knees before she slows down, withdrawing from you in disgust, to go find someone who could actually give her any sexual satisfaction, on her way to world domination.
#2 May 13 2009 at 9:42 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Needs more amputee quadruple penetration.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#3 May 13 2009 at 9:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Given that I got bored with the paragraph o' text by Line #2, I would not be offended by it or rate it down. I also would not read it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4 May 13 2009 at 9:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Needs more paragraphs. Also, Nixnot's ****** is totally overrated.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#5 May 13 2009 at 9:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

I wouldn't rate down the post itself, but I'd rate down the re-post of it by its own author in a blatant attention-grabbing maneuver.

#6 May 13 2009 at 9:48 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
If someone can't be bothered to put in paragraph breaks, I wouldn't bother reading far enough in to rate it down, get offended or form an opinion on it at all. I'd chalk it up to a half-assed, lazy assault upon my eyeballs and move on.
#7 May 13 2009 at 9:49 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
trickybeck wrote:

I wouldn't rate down the post itself, but I'd rate down the re-post of it by its own author in a blatant attention-grabbing maneuver.



Also: this.
#8 May 13 2009 at 10:06 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
**** ari that's just sad. You need a sequel with a kind and gentle tentacle monster or something that shows the protagonise that sex can be enjoyable..

Sentence structure was a little difficult to follow though.
#9 May 13 2009 at 10:25 PM Rating: Good
2/10

Amateur.

#10 May 13 2009 at 10:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Ambrya wrote:
If someone can't be bothered to put in paragraph breaks, I wouldn't bother reading far enough in to rate it down, get offended or form an opinion on it at all. I'd chalk it up to a half-assed, lazy assault upon my eyeballs and move on.

It's one sentence long. That is one of its three intended literary tricks.

Ambrya wrote:
trickybeck wrote:


I wouldn't rate down the post itself, but I'd rate down the re-post of it by its own author in a blatant attention-grabbing maneuver.




Also: this.

It was written as part of the debate in the OOT about whether the OOT and Asylum ought to be merged, and/or one or both more heavily moderated. Unfortunately, unbeknownst to me, by the time I wrote it Kaolian had gone on holiday, and it didn't end up in the Asylum where it was intended to land.

Many people, including myself, wanted the two forums to stay separated, the Asylum to stay unmoderated, and the OOT to have it's rules enforced not by locks and nukes but by thread moves to the Asylum. The point of thread moves instead of locks and nukes was to get content movement happening more frequently in the Asylum, by the influx of threads and posters that wouldn't ordinarily happen there by themselves. The other point of thread moves instead of locks would be to keep content movement happening in the OOT, because a move is generally a lot less dampening to overall morale than a lock.

Now that the forum rules are up for review, the post is pertinent in a different way, and I'm not going to write out another schlock piece cold-bloodedly when I've got this one handy. It already contains rape and child abuse. Although admittedly not attacks on real children. Hmmm, pretend I changed Mindel over to Niobia.

Many OOT posters were protesting about the *OOT* being more heavily moderated. They wanted to keep it the way it has been on average lately, which is far slipped from it's original rules. They want to keep the boundaries pushed out there.

But I agree there has to be a newbie safe zone for out of topic posters, and the OOT is it. Therefore, although I regret it, I think the OOT does need to be more heavily modded so that newbies can post without being attacked before they settle in.

The Asylum exists presently in theory as the playground of the posters who can "take it". There are lots of posters who want a place to read and write cruel or shocking jokes, because that entertains. Or just find entertainment in plain cruel or shocking trolls/content.

So what do we want the Asylum rules to be?

And how do we move over posters from the OOT who are "Asylum ready" but OOT habituated, and not Asylum habituated?


Edited, May 14th 2009 3:07am by Aripyanfar
#11 May 13 2009 at 10:33 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
I don't think anyone who read that took it seriously.

Then again, I didn't take my ex seriously when she said she'd try to castrate me in bed, and look what I got! Scarred **********
#12 May 13 2009 at 10:38 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
zepoodle wrote:
I don't think anyone who read that took it seriously.

Then again, I didn't take my ex seriously when she said she'd try to castrate me in bed, and look what I got! Scarred **********

Someone who has been sexually abused, perhaps especially in childhood, might be made extremely ill/disturbed/traumatised to read something like my OP.

#13 May 13 2009 at 10:38 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,359 posts
[quote]Then again, I didn't take my ex seriously when she said she'd try to castrate me in bed, and look what I got! Scarred ******************

Is there a story to this or are you just being facetious? Cos if there is a story then you need to deliver.
#14 May 13 2009 at 10:40 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
[quote]Then again, I didn't take my ex seriously when she said she'd try to castrate me in bed, and look what I got! Scarred ******************

Is there a story to this or are you just being facetious? Cos if there is a story then you need to deliver.


I'm exaggerating. She did attack me while I was sleeping, but she got nowhere near my ********** I watch out for my boys.
#15 May 13 2009 at 10:44 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Did you end up punching her in the face like kaain did to that lady who choked him?

That was kaain right?
#16 May 13 2009 at 10:45 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
Someone who has been sexually abused, perhaps especially in childhood, might be made extremely ill/disturbed/traumatised to read something like my OP.


Well, yeah, but if you're disgusted by violent sex then you're going to be disgusted by violent ****.

What I mean to say is that everyone on the forums who read that knew that you weren't being serious. Unless you were being serious. In which case, bai!

/flee

Pensive wrote:
Did you end up punching her in the face like kaain did to that lady who choked him?


God, no. She's half my weight. I just lifted her off the ground.

Edited, May 14th 2009 6:46am by zepoodle
#17 May 13 2009 at 10:58 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
zepoodle wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Someone who has been sexually abused, perhaps especially in childhood, might be made extremely ill/disturbed/traumatised to read something like my OP.


Well, yeah, but if you're disgusted by violent sex then you're going to be disgusted by violent ****.

What I mean to say is that everyone on the forums who read that knew that you weren't being serious. Unless you were being serious. In which case, bai!

/flee


Well, I'm sure everyone knew it wasn't a serious post. But someone who has been sexually abused in the past could be traumatised by reading it, even though s/he knew it wasn't a serious post. Are we going to tell these people to read the Asylum at their own risk, or stay in the OOT? Or are we going to ban traumatic subjects in the Asylum? Or are we going to allow some mention of traumatic subjects in some contexts, but not in other contexts? What about if new laws were passed about sentencing to do with a traumatic subject? Should we be allowed to have political discussions about it?
#18 May 14 2009 at 4:58 AM Rating: Decent
Aripyanfar wrote:
zepoodle wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Someone who has been sexually abused, perhaps especially in childhood, might be made extremely ill/disturbed/traumatised to read something like my OP.


Well, yeah, but if you're disgusted by violent sex then you're going to be disgusted by violent ****.

What I mean to say is that everyone on the forums who read that knew that you weren't being serious. Unless you were being serious. In which case, bai!

/flee


Well, I'm sure everyone knew it wasn't a serious post. But someone who has been sexually abused in the past could be traumatised by reading it, even though s/he knew it wasn't a serious post. Are we going to tell these people to read the Asylum at their own risk, or stay in the OOT? Or are we going to ban traumatic subjects in the Asylum? Or are we going to allow some mention of traumatic subjects in some contexts, but not in other contexts? What about if new laws were passed about sentencing to do with a traumatic subject? Should we be allowed to have political discussions about it?


I think 2 things right now: newcomers should stay away from the asylum, and you need to keep your sick, twisted, demented, and filthy thoughts to yourself.
#19 May 14 2009 at 5:02 AM Rating: Default
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Zaikimaliki the Vile wrote:
I think 2 things right now: newcomers should stay away from the asylum, and you need to keep your sick, twisted, demented, and filthy thoughts to yourself.
Neither of these statements are true.
#20 May 14 2009 at 5:23 AM Rating: Good
Aripyanfar wrote:
silver Star of David
Thank you for finally getting the facts straight.

Edited, May 14th 2009 9:23am by Mindel
#21 May 14 2009 at 5:31 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Mindel wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
silver Star of David
Thank you for finally getting the facts straight.
Just for you.

I went through a small phase of posting things that only one other poster would ever get, but I got over that one fairly quickly.
#22 May 14 2009 at 6:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
I think 2 things right now: newcomers should stay away from the asylum, and you need to keep your sick, twisted, demented, and filthy thoughts to yourself.


Smiley: laugh

Er... you were joking, right?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#23 May 14 2009 at 6:45 AM Rating: Good
Aripyanfar wrote:

It was written as part of the debate in the OOT about whether the OOT and Asylum ought to be merged, and/or one or both more heavily moderated. Unfortunately, unbeknownst to me, by the time I wrote it Kaolian had gone on holiday, and it didn't end up in the Asylum where it was intended to land.


I don't understand this. You wanted the Asylum and the OOT to remain separate, and to further that end, you posted something completely Asylum worthy in a thread that was not Asylum worth in an effort to get the entire thing moved?
#24 May 14 2009 at 6:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
To demonstrate a point about whether it would or would not be moved, I think

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#25 May 14 2009 at 6:59 AM Rating: Good
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:

It was written as part of the debate in the OOT about whether the OOT and Asylum ought to be merged, and/or one or both more heavily moderated. Unfortunately, unbeknownst to me, by the time I wrote it Kaolian had gone on holiday, and it didn't end up in the Asylum where it was intended to land.


I don't understand this. You wanted the Asylum and the OOT to remain separate, and to further that end, you posted something completely Asylum worthy in a thread that was not Asylum worth in an effort to get the entire thing moved?
Ari is a troll, too, dear. :)
#26 May 14 2009 at 7:08 AM Rating: Good
Samira wrote:
To demonstrate a point about whether it would or would not be moved, I think



Ooooh. Ok, I guess that makes... a little sense.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 289 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (289)