Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Dear Asylum,Follow

#77 May 05 2009 at 11:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
boywithoutaspoon wrote:
You could make the argument that they would need to start enforcing the rules from the top down, starting in the gaming forums, then. I honestly don't think that much of what goes on in the OoT is any worse than what you see on a daily basis in the gaming forums. I hardly think that the site's Out of Topic forum should be stricter than the MMO Gaming forums.


And I basically agree with you, but we're not the one making the complaints that are driving the admins up the walls. If rules were enforced as written, those complaining would either not have anything to complain about or could be told that if they couldn't deal with the rules, that's their problem.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#78 May 05 2009 at 11:04 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Katielynn wrote:
Duke Ikkian wrote:
I think both the Oot and the Asylum shouldn't be moderated at all (or very lightly), but that the rest of the forums are.


Then why not just merge the two and create another?


Because it's been done before? Because that's how we got here?

What's wrong with moving threads to the appropriate forum?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#79 May 05 2009 at 11:07 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
Katielynn wrote:
Duke Ikkian wrote:
I think both the Oot and the Asylum shouldn't be moderated at all (or very lightly), but that the rest of the forums are.


Then why not just merge the two and create another?


What's the point? It would be the same thing. The current OOT'ers don't want to move to the Asylum because they consider the OOT their home. How would they merge the two to make those folks suddenly want to post here and not in the Sandbox?

It seems to me the most logical solution would be enforcing the rules of the OOT by moving any and all posts that don't comply to here. Eventually, they'll get it.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#80 May 05 2009 at 11:08 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
OK, Sammy beat me to it with fewer words.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#81 May 05 2009 at 11:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Gotta be fast, boy. Smart.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#82 May 05 2009 at 11:12 AM Rating: Decent
Kakar wrote:
Katielynn wrote:
Duke Ikkian wrote:
I think both the Oot and the Asylum shouldn't be moderated at all (or very lightly), but that the rest of the forums are.


Then why not just merge the two and create another?


What's the point? It would be the same thing. The current OOT'ers don't want to move to the Asylum because they consider the OOT their home. How would they merge the two to make those folks suddenly want to post here and not in the Sandbox?

It seems to me the most logical solution would be enforcing the rules of the OOT by moving any and all posts that don't comply to here. Eventually, they'll get it.


So? The original Asylumites were THE orginal OOTers. Your argument isn't valid.
#83 May 05 2009 at 11:14 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
Katielynn wrote:
Kakar wrote:
Katielynn wrote:
Duke Ikkian wrote:
I think both the Oot and the Asylum shouldn't be moderated at all (or very lightly), but that the rest of the forums are.


Then why not just merge the two and create another?


What's the point? It would be the same thing. The current OOT'ers don't want to move to the Asylum because they consider the OOT their home. How would they merge the two to make those folks suddenly want to post here and not in the Sandbox?

It seems to me the most logical solution would be enforcing the rules of the OOT by moving any and all posts that don't comply to here. Eventually, they'll get it.


So? The original Asylumites were THE orginal OOTers. Your argument isn't valid.
Merging/creating forums does fUck-all if the moderating stays inconsistent.

ETA: What is your argument for merging the forums and creating a new one, anyway? That it was done before? How well did it work out if we're basically in the same situation again? "Well, it didn't really work in the long run last time, so let's do it again!" Brill'.

Edited, May 5th 2009 3:22pm by boywithoutaspoon
#84 May 05 2009 at 11:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
I like how the natural progression of human grouping is actively discouraged by the administration. Eventually they will learn that this will always be the way things progress.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#85 May 05 2009 at 11:29 AM Rating: Decent
boywithoutaspoon wrote:
Katielynn wrote:
Kakar wrote:
Katielynn wrote:
Duke Ikkian wrote:
I think both the Oot and the Asylum shouldn't be moderated at all (or very lightly), but that the rest of the forums are.


Then why not just merge the two and create another?


What's the point? It would be the same thing. The current OOT'ers don't want to move to the Asylum because they consider the OOT their home. How would they merge the two to make those folks suddenly want to post here and not in the Sandbox?

It seems to me the most logical solution would be enforcing the rules of the OOT by moving any and all posts that don't comply to here. Eventually, they'll get it.


So? The original Asylumites were THE orginal OOTers. Your argument isn't valid.
Merging/creating forums does fUck-all if the moderating stays inconsistent.

ETA: What is your argument for merging the forums and creating a new one, anyway? That it was done before? How well did it work out if we're basically in the same situation again? "Well, it didn't really work in the long run last time, so let's do it again!" Brill'.

Edited, May 5th 2009 3:22pm by boywithoutaspoon


Actually, it worked for several years. But with everything, as time goes, it changes. The regular OOT'ers became more mature, which led to more racy and outrageous posting. Which finally led to the blowout we are seeing now. Change happens, get used to it.
#86 May 05 2009 at 11:31 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Katielynn wrote:
Change happens, get used to it.
Smiley: lolSmiley: lolSmiley: lol

Merging the forums and creating a new one isn't really change, though. It's just restarting the cycle. For there to be a change, the admins have to actually follow through and moderate.

Edited, May 5th 2009 3:34pm by boywithoutaspoon
#87 May 05 2009 at 11:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Katielynn wrote:
The regular OOT'ers became more mature, which led to more racy and outrageous posting.

Are you sure you don't mean less mature? I think you mean less mature.
#88 May 05 2009 at 11:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
I really don't give a **** what the fuck you say about senjow in here. Are there things you can say or do in Asylum that can get you banned? sure. But you really have to work to find them. Varrus can probably give you some pointers.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#89 May 05 2009 at 11:49 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
In Soviet Russia, kids beat Senjiow.
#90 May 05 2009 at 11:49 AM Rating: Good
****
6,858 posts
Hi Kaolian! How are you?
#91 May 05 2009 at 11:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Ok I guess. Nothing has exploded, and no one took my spleen while I slept and left me in a tub of ice, so there is that...
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#92 May 05 2009 at 11:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
I really don't give a sh*t what the fuck you say about senjow in here. Are there things you can say or do in Asylum that can get you banned? sure. But you really have to work to find them. Varrus can probably give you some pointers.


Sweet.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#93 May 05 2009 at 12:00 PM Rating: Good
****
6,858 posts
Ok I guess. Nothing has exploded, and no one took my spleen while I slept and left me in a tub of ice, so there is that...

That IS important.
#94 May 05 2009 at 12:12 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,369 posts
Senjiow in Chinese is bang thai.
Smiley: schooled
#95 May 05 2009 at 12:31 PM Rating: Decent
No, I had it right the first time. The OOT posters as a whole has matured and now needs something more than the OOT was originally created to provide.
#96 May 05 2009 at 1:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
And the right answer is to move threads to the right forum. There is no need to proliferate fora all over the place, as I said before, on a continuum of niceness.

Two levels should be fine: fluffy and fiery.

When people post the wrong thing in one, move it to the other. It's not a hard concept, really.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#97 May 05 2009 at 1:39 PM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
And the right answer is to move threads to the right forum. There is no need to proliferate fora all over the place, as I said before, on a continuum of niceness.

Two levels should be fine: fluffy and fiery.

When people post the wrong thing in one, move it to the other. It's not a hard concept, really.



Except it would take a full time admin. Allakhazam isn't exactly fully staffed at the moment.
#98 May 05 2009 at 1:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
So would hypermoderating the Happy Fluffy Kitten forum. Either way someone is going to have to moderate.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#99 May 05 2009 at 1:46 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Samira wrote:
So would hypermoderating the Happy Fluffy Kitten forum. Either way someone is going to have to moderate.



Katie doesn't understand that merging without moderating is running around in circles.
#100 May 05 2009 at 1:51 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
As near as I can recall, the last time the oot had a specific moderator, it ended up with a lot of ***** being waved... everywhere, and I'm not talking about flame wars.
#101 May 05 2009 at 1:59 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,251 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
Samira wrote:
So would hypermoderating the Happy Fluffy Kitten forum. Either way someone is going to have to moderate.



Katie doesn't understand that merging without moderating is running around in circles.
Don't you see, though? Change happens, get over it. Smiley: rolleyes

Smiley: lolSmiley: lolSmiley: lol
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 305 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (305)