Liberal Media 101Follow

I actually think there is a protocol like that. I mean, they mentioned it in the West Wing, and I don't think they'd be that blatantly inaccurate. And Washington was referred to as Excellency.

Arch,

I said no such thing. But like most liberals you read what you want into what is said.

I simply pointed out an example of the absolute disrespect the entire press showed W from the time he took office to when he left. That you choose to live with your head in the sand is your choice.

That guy from Talon News liked Bush.

You're kidding, right?

After 9/11, the press did all but give W a reach-around for nearly two years in order to avoid being labeled divisive or unpatriotic. They've never trod so lightly around a president.

If history ever remembers W as anything other than an lazy, ignorant, trigger-happy warmonger, it's going to be because there's so much documentation where his administration was treated with kid gloves.

Conservatism? Although I do not necessarily agree with the Home Office's method of banning people, I'd rather have that than those Westboro twats camping soldiers funerals. I think you're confusing conservatism with extremism, I don't blame you, they are very similar.



He was in a school reading to school children. What's that got to do with the price of fish?

Rhetorical questions on a forum is like pulling teeth. Make your point please.

What's the big friggin deal anyway, why do Dems reject vehemently that the media doesn't love hell out of Obama and hated Bush, everyone at the end of his presidency hated Bush. That's not NEWS. Why do Repubs make a big deal about it. In the grand scheme of things and at the end of the day:

1) what the hell difference does it make, people with 2 eyes and a rudimentary understanding of body language and context can see the love/hate between the two if it exists, drawing attention to it does nothing. If it exists the people will see it and draw their own conclusions.

2) who's going to change it? The media who reports the news is the same media who would write the story about the media bias...when's that story going to seriously come out, I mean really.

Maybe I'm just tired of hearing this ****. Dems embrace the fact the press loves Obama, Republicans will grit their teeth further. Repubs, act like it doesn't make a **** to you, maybe the press will stop sugar coating all things Obama.

Tz,

Ever listened to Rush or Boortz?

Look! An article that describes how one man who owns and runs a zillion news outlets is a neoconservative Republican!
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2004/07/b122948.html

Varrus, all you're doing is exposing how weak-minded and easily manipulated you are. It's the right-side media that's attacking the left and you're just getting caught up in the rhetoric. Why not worry more about what you think than what Glenn Beck tells people to think.

A chance? A chance to what? Spew rhetoric all over me?

Sorry, I don't listen to pundits, I listen to news.

I would, to a degree.

Ever see a documentry where they don't know they're being filmed, then watch the flip side where they do know?

Same group, whole different experiences. The cameras change things. Some ham it up. Even on C-Span.

Michael Savage is pure win.

I've been in the car before explaining to my son that I listen to AM radio to get different viewpoints and thoughts even when I don't agree with them (he was asking why I was listening to some guy insult Obama). The other day Savage was on and I said "You know how I told you I listen to these guys for other viewpoints? This guy I just listen to for the laughs. He's ccrraaazzzyyyy..."