Holy Sh*t -- 60, Muthaf--kersFollow

So... it's not ok for women to have sex for money because it degrades them, but it's perfectly acceptable for you to take advantage of them for free?

Interesting theories you've got there, champ.

Is it hard to live life so full of contradiction that it's hard to write more than one or two sentences without making yourself look like a hypocrite?

Edited, Apr 29th 2009 1:08pm by Belkira

Holy moley, Senator Snowe was right!

Cat,



That's exactly what they're doing. They're printing money we don't have to give govn jobs to people who aren't succeeding in the private sector. That's called buying votes.





This just in the economy is doing much worse than it had been, even after the passing of the oh so great stimulus package, and it's going to get a lot worse. If you people think govn controlling the private sector is going to stimulate the economy you're sorely mistaken. I'm just biding my time and saving every red cent so that when the economies at it's lowest i'll be positioned to take full advantage.





Uncomfortable in my own skin? Is this a slam against health conscience people who strive to improve their physical condition on a daily basis? I love who I am and what I represent. What I don't love is the fact that most people have neither the drive nor inclination to succeed without begging the govn for help at the expense of their neighbor.

Have you considered that someone who was less secure in who they were and what they're about would have long since attempted to change his stripes after a continual barrage of insults and attacks over the course of years?

We all have issues, mine happens to be an afinity for pretty young (college) girls; let he who is without sin cast the first stone. What's sad is what you allow you're govn to do to people is behaviour you would never in a million years consider doing yourself. I mean forcing the govn to pay for healthcare...wtf is that?

Cat,



Kind of goes against the concept of freedom to have your neighbor fund your healthcare dontcha think?

In the "Like Rain On Your Wedding Day" file, the NRSC is running robocalls in Pennsylvania linking Arlen Specter to President Bush

In the "Like Rain On Your Wedding Day" file, the NRSC is running robocalls in Pennsylvania linking Arlen Specter to President Bush

Steele better be offering little boys and oxy to every moderate Republican in the Northeast to run in the primary. Toomey gets slaughtered in the General against anyone who isn't fucking a sheep in their campaign ads. On the other hand, I guess he has the prospect of an exciting three way deal if Specter looses the Dem primary to, oh...Bob Casey or whomever, where they might be able to steal the seat with a plurality.

Freedom is hardly an end in itself. It's just so amazingly linked with pleasure that people conflate the two.

The answer to your question is negative in any case, so the point is moot.

No, that's taxation. You know what the rules are for living in the country. They're not secret rules. You make the choice to live here, under those rules. If you dislike the rules, there is a means of changing them. They may never get changed to how you want them but that's different from there being no way to change them. If it comes down to it, you're able to leave this land and its rules and go find another land with other rules more to your liking -- the US doesn't have any iron curtains or brick walls keeping its citizens inside.

But none of that makes it "stealing".

Man this is a clumsy analogy ...

I like that guy more and more everyday, he always says something to amuse me.

I think that there's nothing at all wrong with asking everyone (not just the wealthy) to help out those less fortunate in our country via paying in taxes.

Why is this a better option than waiting and hoping that someone will be kind enough to "help their neighbor?" Because not everyone will be able to benefit from that sort of charity. This way, it's organized, centralized, and able to reach everyone who needs it.

Edited, Apr 30th 2009 2:30pm by Belkira

Tough ****** I guess. I don't like a lot of the things my taxes go towards. Not much I can do about that, though. The war in Iraq still needs to be funded. Personally, I'd rather see every single person in America have healthcare than have Saddam hanged.

I'd rather see you stop (supposedly) having sex with multiple women, thus creating the potential for contracting and spreading an STD and (1) once again becoming a walking contridiction, given your predaliction for wanting to keep homosexuals from being married is because you mistakenly believe they are more likely to catch and spread an STD when your own behavior is just as bad, if not worse, and (2) posing just as much of a risk of forcing other people to pay for your poor life choices.

I'm not sure how you live your life being so hypocritical so much of the time.

Not personally, but yes, I'd be fine with my tax dollars going towards your care. I'm nice like that.



I understand that you've said over and over that homosexuals are more likely to contract an STD, which is false by the way. Promiscuous people are more likely to contract an STD, whether they be homosexual or heterosexual.

Edited, Apr 30th 2009 4:20pm by Belkira