Psh, why would you even want to save marriage?
It's a failed institution... y hallo thar 50% divorce rate.
But of course, if you let them get married, then people will be married to their dogs!
Makes me sick that zealots who believe their way is best are allowed to keep the fact that
"All men are created equal"
away from a certain group of people... just because, y'know, we dun like you queens comin' near our chitlins and guns.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- The problem with "domestic partnership"
The problem with "domestic partnership"Follow
hangtennow wrote:
Now because these two engaged in acts that directly led to his death we have completely re-define traditional marriage? Sounds about par for the homosexual agenda.
Seriously. No, seriously. I don't normally bite, but I have to say this.
STRAIGHT PEOPLE GET AIDS TOO.
There. It's out of my system now.
hangtennow wrote:
Zepoodle,
Either from blood transfusions or sleeping with someone who has aids.
Quote:
STRAIGHT PEOPLE GET AIDS TOO.
Either from blood transfusions or sleeping with someone who has aids.
Edited, May 1st 2009 10:23am by AshOnMyTomatoes
hangtennow wrote:
Zepoodle,
Either from blood transfusions or sleeping with someone who has aids.
Quote:
STRAIGHT PEOPLE GET AIDS TOO.
Either from blood transfusions or sleeping with someone who has aids.
IV Drug use is more likely than blood transfusions.
Nexa
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.â€
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
hangtennow wrote:
nexa,
/nod...but homosexual activity decreases ones immune system making them more susceptible to contracting the disease.
Quote:
IV Drug use is more likely than blood transfusions.
/nod...but homosexual activity decreases ones immune system making them more susceptible to contracting the disease.
Edited, May 1st 2009 10:49am by AshOnMyTomatoes
hangtennow wrote:
nexa,
/nod...but homosexual activity decreases ones immune system making them more susceptible to contracting the disease.
Quote:
IV Drug use is more likely than blood transfusions.
/nod...but homosexual activity decreases ones immune system making them more susceptible to contracting the disease.
Umm, no. What may be confusing you is that one is more susceptible to contract HIV through **** vs. vaginal intercourse, whether you be heterosexual or homosexual. Lesbians are pretty much the least likely to contract HIV through sexual activity.
Nexa
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.â€
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
hangtennow wrote:
nexa,
/nod...but homosexual activity decreases ones immune system making them more susceptible to contracting the disease.
Quote:
IV Drug use is more likely than blood transfusions.
/nod...but homosexual activity decreases ones immune system making them more susceptible to contracting the disease.
LOL!!!!
Virus made a funny!
hangtennow wrote:
Nexa,
Ok so just gay sex between men increases the liklihood of catching an std.
Quote:
Umm, no. What may be confusing you is that one is more susceptible to contract HIV through **** vs. vaginal intercourse
Ok so just gay sex between men increases the liklihood of catching an std.
You do realize that many gay men don't engage in **** intercourse, right?
No, no, of course you don't. Because you homophobes are obsessed with the buttsecks.
In case you have some tiny interest in allowing a spark of reality into your hugely off-base assumptions, one study reports that 24% of gay men reported no **** intercourse, while another 23% reported protected **** intercourse only.
In other words, fully 47% of gay men have no increased risk over the heterosexual population. And that's not even taking into account the fact that ~10% of straight women engage in **** intercourse and somewhere between 60-70% of those don't use protection when doing so.
Edited, May 1st 2009 9:19am by Ambrya
hangtennow wrote:
Nexa,
Ok so just gay sex between men increases the liklihood of catching an std.
Quote:
Umm, no. What may be confusing you is that one is more susceptible to contract HIV through **** vs. vaginal intercourse
Ok so just gay sex between men increases the liklihood of catching an std.
hangtennow wrote:
Nexa,
Ok so just gay sex between men increases the liklihood of catching an std.
Quote:
Umm, no. What may be confusing you is that one is more susceptible to contract HIV through **** vs. vaginal intercourse
Ok so just gay sex between men increases the liklihood of catching an std.
mmmm, closer, but not quite. Regardless of sex, you are more likely to contract HIV (I'm uncertain about other stds) by engaging in **** intercourse with an infected individual as opposed to vaginal intercourse. If the individual with whom you are having intercourse is not infected, you are no more likely to contract HIV by having sex with that person if the person happens to be of the same sex as yourself.
So basically, gay men who engage in unprotected **** sex (which not all do), are more at risk of contracting HIV from an already infected individual than a woman would be from having unprotected vaginal intercourse with same infected individual (though I still wouldn't recommend it). ETA: Likewise, if a woman is HIV positive, you're more at risk of contracting the virus from having **** sex with her vs. vaginal.
I know you don't actually care, but I just can't help myself.
Nexa
Edited, May 1st 2009 11:56am by Nexa
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.â€
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
Nexa,
ok.
Quote:
So basically, gay men who engage in unprotected **** sex (which not all do), are more at risk of contracting HIV from an already infected individual
ok.
hangtennow wrote:
Nexa,
ok.
Quote:
So basically, gay men who engage in unprotected **** sex (which not all do), are more at risk of contracting HIV from an already infected individual
ok.
Yes, but no more at risk than heterosexual men having **** sex with an infected woman. The point is that it's the nature of **** intercourse, not the sexual orientation, that ups the risk factor.
Nexa
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.â€
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
Nexa wrote:
hangtennow wrote:
Nexa,
ok.
Quote:
So basically, gay men who engage in unprotected **** sex (which not all do), are more at risk of contracting HIV from an already infected individual
ok.
Yes, but no more at risk than heterosexual men having **** sex with an infected woman. The point is that it's the nature of **** intercourse, not the sexual orientation, that ups the risk factor.
Nexa
He realises all this, he's just being a douche.
Quote:
~10% of straight women engage in **** intercourse
I bet that number is on the upswing. Somewhere it ceased being taboo with the young 'uns.
baelnic wrote:
Quote:
~10% of straight women engage in **** intercourse
I bet that number is on the upswing. Somewhere it ceased being taboo with the young 'uns.
It's all the abstinence-only education. It teaches them to take it up the back instead of breaking the hymen so that they won't get pregnant.
Which, coincidentally, both makes the sex more painful for the woman and more dangerous for both parties.
The obvious answer to all this is to ban buttsecks.
Or surgically make buttsecks impossible.
Or surgically make buttsecks impossible.
Self-cauterizing butt plugs?
hangtennow wrote:
/nod...but homosexual activity decreases ones immune system making them more susceptible to contracting the disease.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wow.
Ok, seriously. Now that I've stopped laughing. I would really love to see your source for that last comment. I would really love to believe that there actually was a study done on the subject that came to that same conclusion. I would really really love to read it over and digest it's many intricacies. Unfortunately, I stubbornly remain here in reality, where you're just an ignorant twit.
Recent Visitors: 659
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (659)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- The problem with "domestic partnership"
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC