People have more sex when they aren't married
Why do I suddenly feel like a stand-up comedian ?
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- The problem with "domestic partnership"
The problem with "domestic partnership"Follow
Perhaps we should make sub-Saharan Africa illegal as well, except for the areas where Islam is a major influence there seems to be a lot of AIDS transmissions as well. Islam is the light!
The major transmissions of AIDS is having multiple partners, especially if engaging in unprotected sex, and intravenous drug use. So you as a heterosexual man who has had multiple sex partners are more likely to have and transmit HIV then a gay couple.
The major transmissions of AIDS is having multiple partners, especially if engaging in unprotected sex, and intravenous drug use. So you as a heterosexual man who has had multiple sex partners are more likely to have and transmit HIV then a gay couple.
hangtennow wrote:
Govn recognizing marriage encourages a behaviour that is a health risk.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
hangtennow wrote:
That's like saying Clintons infidelity didn't have an affect marriage, of course it does.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I blame infidelity on the bible, that's the oldest place it's been recorded.
I blame it on the infidels.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
hangtennow wrote:
Jophed,
The populace pays attention to what the govn is doing. After Clinton was caught acts of oral sex shot up among teenagers and young adults.
Quote:
Seriously.... lolwut???
The populace pays attention to what the govn is doing. After Clinton was caught acts of oral sex shot up among teenagers and young adults.
hangtennow wrote:
After Clinton was caught acts of oral sex shot up among teenagers and young adults.
...wait a second. WTF does that have to do with "affecting marriage"? Were all the teens and young adults blowing married dudes?
Edited, May 8th 2009 1:35pm by Jophiel
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
hangtennow wrote:
Jophed,
The populace pays attention to what the govn is doing. After Clinton was caught acts of oral sex shot up among teenagers and young adults.
Quote:
Seriously.... lolwut???
The populace pays attention to what the govn is doing. After Clinton was caught acts of oral sex shot up among teenagers and young adults.
Well, you were certainly a young adult at the time, so I guess you'd know. You *****.
Are you just sad and lonely that no woman will love you enough to marry you because you're a douchebag, so you don't want anyone to marry at all?
It's ok. I don't share your issue, but I understand it. It will all get better in time, maybe thinking logically is a good first step towards finding love.
I didn't know Amilque or w/e had a sock :p
People will have sex whether they're married or not.
Recognizing homosexual marriage has absolutely nothing to do with that fact.
Recognizing homosexual marriage has absolutely nothing to do with that fact.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samira wrote:
People will have sex whether they're married or not.
Recognizing homosexual marriage has absolutely nothing to do with that fact.
Recognizing homosexual marriage has absolutely nothing to do with that fact.
But the Bible says they shouldn't!
It's an immoral behavior. We should legislate against having sex.
hangtennow wrote:
It has to do with the populace acting in ways they think their govn deem appropriate. Children saw Clinton getting a bj at work so they in turn think it's ok to get their 12yr old gf to give them one under the bleachers. I mean the presidents getting them at work so it must be ok right?
Even if your claim that oral sex shot up among teens (which I doubt but whatever) is true, that has nothing at all to do with marriage.
Edited, May 8th 2009 1:53pm by Jophiel
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Quote:
It has to do with the populace acting in ways they think their govn deem appropriate. Children saw Clinton getting a bj at work so they in turn think it's ok to get their 12yr old gf to give them one under the bleachers. I mean the presidents getting them at work so it must be ok right?
I thought it was the job of the family and community to teach right and wrong. At least that's what conservatives have been ranting about.
hangtennow wrote:
Children saw Clinton getting a bj at work
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
hangtennow wrote:
I used Clinton as an example of how the govn can affect how people act.
You previously wrote:
That's like saying Clintons infidelity didn't have an affect marriage, of course it does.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
hangtennow wrote:
Jophed,
I used Clinton as an example of how the govn can affect how people act.
Quote:
That's not what you said. You said that Clinton's infidelity affected marriage.
I used Clinton as an example of how the govn can affect how people act.
B. This has all been a nice distraction.
hangtennow wrote:
baelnic,
and child says, "but Clinton did it".
Quote:
I thought it was the job of the family and community to teach right and wrong. At least that's what conservatives have been ranting about.
and child says, "but Clinton did it".
If any children today have the slightest clue about the Clinton thing, I feel sorry for them. I still can't understand how it was ever news.
It's actually been more entertaining than listening to "We need marriage benefits for the naturally produced children!" over and over again.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Recent Visitors: 268
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (268)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- The problem with "domestic partnership"
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC