trickybeck wrote:
But hatred isn't even a means!
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
It can feasibly contribute to or even be the proximate cause of events in the world.
Now you're back to the "hatred is toxic and poisons the mind" argument which you previously posted, then deleted.
Which could conceivably be an argument for "hatred is unhealthy" or possibly even "hatred is bad" but not for "hatred is unethical."
I'd also add that according to that logic,
every emotion is unethical. Love can feasibly contribute to jealousy and selfishness, which can feasibly contribute to unethical actions. Selflessness can feasibly lead to self-sacrifice, which can feasibly result in unethical consequences. Continuing, if everything emotion can feasibly be unethical, then every emotion can feasibly be ethical, therefore making them ethically neutral as I originally stated.
And with that I will depart the discussion.
I'm not extremely attached to most of the ideas that I talk about in dialogue. You might be correct really; I'm not exactly sure when I became so dogmatic about ethics, especially considering that they are all specious to begin with.
I'd consider "unethical" and "bad" synonymous though.
I could have short circuited this entire discussion and just rephrased what i wass asking of catwho. Given the choice between hating or not hating, not hating is the one that I would prescribe. Prescriptions are generally associated directly with ethics.
Wow that could have been formatted better
Edited, May 6th 2009 5:59pm by Pensive