He uses words like a dysentery-sufferer uses Charmin - it's all quantity, driving home an ill-conceived point with ever-more outlandish and baseless proaganda, and repeating the same idiocy with a florid range of nouns, adjectives and adverbs, thrown together randomly like a bad stir-fry.
At some stage he learned the phrases "Ad Hominem" and "Straw Man" and remains clueless about their appropriate usage. In terms of the English language, he reminds me of a music-nerd who's memorised the score but never heard the song.
On the odd, rare occasion he will stumble upon an accurate, valid point ('100 Monkeys writing Hamlet' syndrome, maybe)
but will then dilute it in lexicograpohical saline.
I wish we had a wider spectrum of political representation here - We have ToUtem who can eloquently interpret a Republican perspective and clarify a justification. But by-and-large, the Right wing perspective is left to gbaji, and it's the poorer for it. He genuinely reminds me of Dracoid in troll mode - defending the indefensible dogmatically, without truly understanding context, implications or provenance.
This image always reminds me of gbaji's posts. . .
. . . except unlike this image, the nail is rarely hit on the head, never mind driven home.
But on topic (something 'nice'), no matter how far he backs himself into a corner, mangles language until even he has lost any sense of what he means, and misses the fundamental tenets of counter-arguments, I can rarely remembering him using the word "Phlariant", which has to be a good thing, right?