gbaji wrote:
Actually, I think Smash may have a point here (gasp!). There are relief programs designed to help out people with their home loans, but most of them only kick in if the person has been delinquent a specific amount of time, or even gone into foreclosure. Couldn't say I know the details, but I seem to recall hearing proposals about such things.
I think it's kinda stupid, but if you actually specifically asked your bank to help you qualify for such a program, then yeah, their actions make perfect sense.
The specifics of the modification was not a foreclosure program primarily because what's available now didn't exist at the time. It was a rewrite of the loan terms with the current (at the time I think 5.5% or so) interest rate and the rewrite was suppose to cover the deliquent period in effect similar to a deferment of payments. Although you (and Smash) are right, as mid-December of '08 the foreclosure "programs" starting rolling out. My bank just apparently didn't get the memo.
gbaji wrote:
Um... You still should have just gone to a third party and gotten a solid refinance instead. Right now, there is a booming industry surrounding this very thing. Lots of people got themselves into crappy ARMs with balloon payments and other silly things, which can be fixed up pretty easily by someone with the right skills and contacts.
Right now, yes. At the time refinancing would have not worked. The mortgage value vs. assessed value would have resulted in us actually borrowing "more" to handle closing costs and lawyer fees, against a house with technically no equity. We really wouldn't have won on that one. Once the rates started really dropping out of the 6% range, we would have tried, but the delinquent mortgage was working against us. We fell into a pathetic gray area between the time where the current programs were not there yet, and we already made the mistake of listening to the bank. Sh
it happens.