Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

So, Who'has read all the way through Obama's Budget?Follow

#77REDACTED, Posted: Mar 03 2009 at 8:32 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Not because I'm immune to the claim, but because it is exactly right.
#78 Mar 03 2009 at 8:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
KinleyArdal wrote:
Annabella wrote:
No, you'd be a democrat--maybe a more moderate to conservative one but a democrat nonetheless. The modern republican is either entirely disenfranchised or batsh*t insane.


A little bit of both; that's what comes when you watch as your nation is slowly strangled by liberalism, dragging it down and turning it into Western Europe across the ocean.

She was talking to me and I'm no American. Canada has been quite successful being like Western Europe and liberating our ideals.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#79 Mar 03 2009 at 8:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Uglysasquatch, ****** Superhero wrote:
KinleyArdal wrote:
Annabella wrote:
No, you'd be a democrat--maybe a more moderate to conservative one but a democrat nonetheless. The modern republican is either entirely disenfranchised or batsh*t insane.


A little bit of both; that's what comes when you watch as your nation is slowly strangled by liberalism, dragging it down and turning it into Western Europe across the ocean.

She was talking to me and I'm no American. Canada has been quite successful being like Western Europe and liberating our ideals.


Maybe you're talking about a different Western Europe? He specifically mentioned he's talking about the one across the ocean.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#80 Mar 03 2009 at 8:47 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Ooops, my bad. I meant the one not across the ocean.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#81REDACTED, Posted: Mar 03 2009 at 8:49 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I'm aware of that, for that reason I was pondering whether or not I should put in a disclaimer on the post but decided against it.
#82 Mar 03 2009 at 9:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts

Quote:
Anyhow, yes! You are Canadian, and my Canadian associates feel that by and large, Canada is just fine. I know very little about it, for my part.


You do realize that Canada is far more liberal than the US, right?

Just checking.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#83 Mar 03 2009 at 9:43 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Timelordwho wrote:

Quote:
Anyhow, yes! You are Canadian, and my Canadian associates feel that by and large, Canada is just fine. I know very little about it, for my part.


You do realize that Canada is far more liberal than the US, right?

Just checking.
Any country that's not more liberal than the US tends to be one you are at/want to be at war with. Coincidence?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#84 Mar 03 2009 at 9:50 AM Rating: Good
Totem wrote:
And don't get me started on the sheer regularity with which arguments are ignored and replaced with an assumed religious right position instead...


If you want us to stop assuming you side with the religious right, then get people like Kinley up there to stop quoting the Bible as part of his argument.

Unfortunately, the GOP as it is cannot survive as either a secular conservative party or a religious conservative party. You don't have enough conservatives remaining on either side of the divide to call yourself a national party if you do that. So like it or not, you're stucky with your religious conservatives, no matter how much you argue from an idealogical conservative standpoint.

That was the danger of embracing the religious right -- you can't get rid of them now.

Right now Democrats are watching the GOP eat their young, and enjoying the show immensely. Poor Michael Steele was forced to kowtow to the Almighty Rush for daring to call him "incendiary." Ralph Emmanuel, not looking a gift horse in the mouth, proceeded to call Limbaugh the "intellectual force behind the Republican party."

So. You guys gonna run Rush Limbaugh for prez in 2012? Since he's become the de facto leader of the party as acknowledged by the RNC's capitulation to him.

Smiley: popcorn
#85REDACTED, Posted: Mar 03 2009 at 10:53 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Right now we're watching Obama do all he can to kill the market and end modern day capitalism.
#86 Mar 03 2009 at 10:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
bluffrat wrote:
Right now we're watching Obama do all he can to kill the market and end modern day capitalism.

5 months since Obama was elected and the market is at it's lowest point in nearly 20yrs.
This sounds vaguely familiar, and still just as stupid.
#87REDACTED, Posted: Mar 03 2009 at 11:12 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Granted I'm probably not as bright at you are. That said, how does that change the fact that since Obama was elected the market has shot down. Shouldn't people be filled with a sense of hope?
#88 Mar 03 2009 at 11:14 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
bluffratt wrote:
Granted I'm probably not as bright at you are. That said, how does that change the fact that since Obama was elected the market has shot down. Shouldn't people be filled with a sense of hope?

In fact I suggest someone create a thread listing the number of people who have lost their job since Obama was elected.
2 separate socks at once, eh?

Oh, and you suck at causality.
#89 Mar 03 2009 at 11:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
bluffratt wrote:
Granted I'm probably not as bright at you are. That said, how does that change the fact that since Obama was elected the market has shot down. Shouldn't people be filled with a sense of hope?

In fact I suggest someone create a thread listing the number of people who have lost their job since Obama was elected.


I'll start.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#90REDACTED, Posted: Mar 03 2009 at 11:21 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I know I suck...I'm stupid...personalize the attack. It's much easier to attack someone than a failing ideology. The market will continue to shoot down until Obama realizes you can't tax business owners and expect them not react accordingly.
#91 Mar 03 2009 at 11:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
bluffratt wrote:
As it is I'm betting it will go lower thank 5k before it starts to get better.

So am I, but I'm basing it on trends, rather than partisan idiocy. Do you really not see that this has all been brewing for the better part of a decade? They didn't call it a "bubble" for nothing: the market has been artificially inflated with these financial flimflams for awhile now, and it has burst.

If anything, the election of Obama was an effect of the economy. I'm sure you'll have forgotten all about that though.

Oh, and yes, you really are stupid. That has nothing to do with politics, though.

Edited, Mar 3rd 2009 1:25pm by AshOnMyTomatoes
#92REDACTED, Posted: Mar 03 2009 at 11:37 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Of course this isn't an overnight phenomena. However, the market does react to what the president says. The fact is businesses do not like what they're hearing.
#93 Mar 03 2009 at 11:38 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
bluffratt wrote:
Quote:
So am I, but I'm basing it on trends, rather than partisan idiocy. Do you really not see that this has all been brewing for the better part of a decade? They didn't call it a "bubble" for nothing: the market has been artificially inflated with these financial flimflams for awhile now, and it has burst.


Of course this isn't an overnight phenomena. However, the market does react to what the president says. The fact is businesses do not like what they're hearing.
Yes, I'd imagine hearing "massive bank failure" day in and day out does tend to wear on an entrepreneur.
#94 Mar 03 2009 at 11:42 AM Rating: Default
Actually hearing trillions of dollars spent on government programs is frightening them more than the banking crisis because they know that this is going to directly affect more than just the top 5% of wage earners. Businesses are expecting a tax increase and are scaling back operations in anticipation of this increase.

#95 Mar 03 2009 at 12:20 PM Rating: Excellent
I think they're more unhappy about the fact that they're having to lay off workers because they can't get credit from other banks to make payroll, than they are hearing that they might get taxed more.

Getting taxed another few percentage points doesn't mean anything if they can't get any credit to actually run their business on a daily basis. That's what the problem is.

1. Banks screwed up and made ****** loans to people.
2. Banks attempted to hide their screwup by slicing and dicing the loans and calling them something else, then buying insurance on the loans.
3. People who bought the sliced up loans also bought insurance.
4. People who originally got the loans lose their jobs and can't make their payments, at the same time their payments are shooting through the roof because they were term ARMS. They default.
5. The sliced up mortgages, which were previously a valuable debt-asset, suddenly turn worthless. The insurance holders call in their insurance policies.
6. NET EFFECT: American Insurance Group is having to pay out billions in dollars in insurance, while banks are absolutely terrified to lend any money in the off chance that AIG goes under and they themselves are stuck writing off bad debt.
7. Business that relied in small daily, weekly, monthly loans to cover payroll are unable to borrow money from the banks, forcing them to have to downsize staff to cover operating costs.

Where do business taxes fit into the equation?

The only way to end the crisis is to convince the banks to lend again. Not raise taxes, lower taxes, or do any sort of tax voodoo dance.
#96 Mar 03 2009 at 12:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
catwho the Pest wrote:
I think they're more unhappy about the fact that they're having to lay off workers because they can't get credit from other banks to make payroll, than they are hearing that they might get taxed more.

Getting taxed another few percentage points doesn't mean anything if they can't get any credit to actually run their business on a daily basis. That's what the problem is.

1. Banks screwed up and made sh*tty loans to people.
2. Banks attempted to hide their screwup by slicing and dicing the loans and calling them something else, then buying insurance on the loans.
3. People who bought the sliced up loans also bought insurance.
4. People who originally got the loans lose their jobs and can't make their payments, at the same time their payments are shooting through the roof because they were term ARMS. They default.
5. The sliced up mortgages, which were previously a valuable debt-asset, suddenly turn worthless. The insurance holders call in their insurance policies.
6. NET EFFECT: American Insurance Group is having to pay out billions in dollars in insurance, while banks are absolutely terrified to lend any money in the off chance that AIG goes under and they themselves are stuck writing off bad debt.
7. Business that relied in small daily, weekly, monthly loans to cover payroll are unable to borrow money from the banks, forcing them to have to downsize staff to cover operating costs.

Where do business taxes fit into the equation?

The only way to end the crisis is to convince the banks to lend again. Not raise taxes, lower taxes, or do any sort of tax voodoo dance.
You just spoke Gobbledegook to someone who only sees things in partisan terms.
#97 Mar 03 2009 at 12:33 PM Rating: Default
It's not the banks that caused the problem. It was the govn allowing the banks to loan money to people with poor credit, no down payment, and unstable employment history. Astoundingly this still hasn't been addressed. This is why the banks aren't loaning money to people who don't fit all the aforementioned criteria.

#98 Mar 03 2009 at 12:37 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
bluffratt wrote:
It's not the banks that caused the problem. It was the govn allowing the banks to loan money to people with poor credit, no down payment, and unstable employment history. Astoundingly this still hasn't been addressed. This is why the banks aren't loaning money to people who don't fit all the aforementioned criteria.

If someone is caught exploiting a loophole, do you blame the exploiter, or the ruleset the loophole is in?
#99REDACTED, Posted: Mar 03 2009 at 12:46 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ash,
#100 Mar 03 2009 at 12:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
bluffratt wrote:
Ash,

If a ship has a hole in it do you focus on how the hole got there or plugging it up?

Ok.

So why are you always railing on and on about who caused this mess?
#101 Mar 03 2009 at 12:49 PM Rating: Default
I thought I was railing at the lack of inaction by the administration in addressing these issues. Simply spending more of the taxpayers money does nothing to fix this.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 252 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (252)