Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Cold cheese sandwich anyone?Follow

#52 Feb 25 2009 at 7:08 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
wildre wrote:
When did they start allowing kids to charge lunch at school? We either brought out own,which was sure to be better than the school lunch, or paid up front for what we getting.


I don't recall it ever being a "cash and carry" type of thing (not where I went to school anyway). I do remember that in grade school, the parents basically pre-paid like a month in advance. They'd send the lunch schedule out in a newsletter type thing, and the parents would send in a check with the days/meals they wanted for their kid. A number of lunches arrived at the school equal to the number that were ordered (this was grade school, so no cafeteria). Your name was on a list. If your name wasn't on the list, you didn't get a school lunch. It was pretty simple and there was never a problem.

Today, they tend to use credit systems. The parents pay into it, and the kids buy lunches out of the fund. Very much like food cards at universities. In theory it gives the kids more choice about what they eat, but it leads to the problem in the linked story. The kid walks up to the lunch line expecting to get a lunch, and is rejected cause he's out of money. Oops. It's a lot easier to forget to fill a fund like that then to forget to do a once a month order. Also, it's a lot easier for the school to just let the money slide and allow the credit to go negative so that the kid can get his food, which leads to parents being less diligent about it, and results in a school district being $140,000 short in it's food program. That's a lot of parents forgetting to pay their lunch fund...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#53 Feb 26 2009 at 1:47 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
The One and Only toohotforu wrote:
Being from a single parent family whos mother only made 28,000 a year I was on the reduced lunch program. Not free. $5 a week was the reduced rate and still cost my mother more then what she could afford at the time. She manage to come up with it but the requirements for what is considered "low income" is not all that low in some cases.



My dad made 24k or so a year when I was in elementary as the sole household provider and I totally got the free lunches. In high school I got the reduced price lunches and my parents were making about 40-45k between them.

Lady DSD wrote:
As far as I'm concerned I think the parents should be thankful their children are provided a nutritious meal of sandwich, fruit, and milk when they could be given nothing at all. Some kids don't even get that.


I agree. Sounds like a pretty good deal, to be honest.

Quote:
"Many of these children don't have breakfast, they may not have supper, and this is the only meal they may get," said Joyce Victoriano, a grandparent.


I'm sorry, but I don't buy it. The kids not getting enough at home just doesn't sway me as far as this. If they're not getting enough to eat at home, the something else is wrong, and the school footing the bill for these kids isn't the solution in any way.

Parents too busy working and can't serve their kids meals? Then either get family involved or teach your kid to serve themselves simple, nutritious meals at home. Sure, they may be eating nothing but sandwiches with veggies on the side if they're young enough, but I could make a number of cold meals/snacks as a six year old. I cooked half my family's dinners once I was twelve. Unsupervised.

Parents can't afford to buy food for their kids? That's a sign outside assistance is needed. Be it family or government. The school is helping fill the gap as best they can, but truth is that school budgets are low already. Additional burden could be the difference between the basics that the school needs to teach the kids and not having enough.

For those kids that have applications in for the free lunch program but haven't been processed yet, well that's a problem for the government itself. It certainly needs to process those faster. I certainly feel bad for those kids. But even then, they're getting a fairly decent meal at no cost. Can't say I think the school is doing wrong.
#54 Feb 28 2009 at 10:11 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Lady DSD wrote:
As far as I'm concerned I think the parents should be thankful their children are provided a nutritious meal of sandwich, fruit, and milk when they could be given nothing at all. Some kids don't even get that.


I agree. Sounds like a pretty good deal, to be honest.


It's probably a hell of a lot more healthy than the usual school lunch of that sheet pizza cut into rectangles that is swimming in pepperoni grease. I swear my elementary school served that at least two times a week. Of course it tasted great (fat and sugar always does). But not exactly a healthy balanced lunch.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#55 Feb 28 2009 at 4:28 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
TirithRR wrote:
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Lady DSD wrote:
As far as I'm concerned I think the parents should be thankful their children are provided a nutritious meal of sandwich, fruit, and milk when they could be given nothing at all. Some kids don't even get that.


I agree. Sounds like a pretty good deal, to be honest.


It's probably a hell of a lot more healthy than the usual school lunch of that sheet pizza cut into rectangles that is swimming in pepperoni grease. I swear my elementary school served that at least two times a week. Of course it tasted great (fat and sugar always does). But not exactly a healthy balanced lunch.
Are you kidding? It tasted terrible.
#56 Feb 28 2009 at 4:37 PM Rating: Good
Sage
**
602 posts
At my elementary school if you didn't have money for lunch they gave you a peanut butter sandwich.

TirithRR wrote:
It's probably a hell of a lot more healthy than the usual school lunch of that sheet pizza cut into rectangles that is swimming in pepperoni grease. I swear my elementary school served that at least two times a week. Of course it tasted great (fat and sugar always does). But not exactly a healthy balanced lunch.


In high school we sometimes used the grease from chocolate chip cookies to draw things on the cafeteria table. I never imagined that a cookie could be so greasy.
#57 Feb 28 2009 at 4:52 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Sweetums wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Lady DSD wrote:
As far as I'm concerned I think the parents should be thankful their children are provided a nutritious meal of sandwich, fruit, and milk when they could be given nothing at all. Some kids don't even get that.


I agree. Sounds like a pretty good deal, to be honest.


It's probably a hell of a lot more healthy than the usual school lunch of that sheet pizza cut into rectangles that is swimming in pepperoni grease. I swear my elementary school served that at least two times a week. Of course it tasted great (fat and sugar always does). But not exactly a healthy balanced lunch.
Are you kidding? It tasted terrible.


Pizza and Chicken Nuggets were the best school lunchs we had.

Back in elementary school we used to get Pork Cutlet with Chocolate Pudding. And everyone always dipped the pork in the pudding, I don't know why, but we all thought it tasted great.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 203 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (203)