Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Wanna play "I Spy?"Follow

#1 Feb 20 2009 at 12:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
How long will it take to find a "for the good of the children!" in this little gem?!


Quote:
(CNET) -- Republican politicians on Thursday called for a sweeping new federal law that would require all Internet providers and operators of millions of Wi-Fi access points, even hotels, local coffee shops, and home users, to keep records about users for two years to aid police investigations.


Thanks for keeping tabs on that thar gubberment Repubs! We don't want 'em gettin' too big for their britches!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#2 Feb 20 2009 at 12:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
teh article wrote:
"While the Internet has generated many positive changes in the way we communicate and do business, its limitless nature offers anonymity that has opened the door to criminals looking to harm innocent children," U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, said at a press conference on Thursday.


Well that didn't take long.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#3 Feb 20 2009 at 1:03 PM Rating: Decent
select * from ************** 
where targetSite = 'toohot4tots.com' 
and dataSent like '%sex%'


Not really. It's a stupid ******* law written by people who don't understand the technical implications.
#4 Feb 20 2009 at 1:18 PM Rating: Excellent
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
My door to harming innocent children is on my pants.

wait..
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#5 Feb 20 2009 at 1:43 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
The legislation, which echoes a measure proposed by one of their Democratic colleagues three years ago, would impose unprecedented data retention requirements on a broad swath of Internet access providers and is certain to draw fire from businesses and privacy advocates.


Quote:
Democratic


Sounds like both parties are guilty on this one, at least according to the article you linked.
#6 Feb 20 2009 at 4:21 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
I always wondered if people used hotel, or other wifi areas, for illegal activity, how would they trace it back to the person?
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#7 Feb 20 2009 at 4:42 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
TirithRR wrote:
I always wondered if people used hotel, or other wifi areas, for illegal activity, how would they trace it back to the person?


Digital signatures involved in any of a number of processes. Most obvious is MAC address off your network card, but that's only the most basic. The process of connecting to a network involves a number of handshaking mechanisms, during which any number of identification type signals are sent back and forth. These form a kind of digital fingerprint which law enforcement can use to track someone.


I'll also point out that the ignorance of the technical implications lies on both sides of this sort of debate. The records they're talking about are pretty basic. It's not like they're requiring internet cafe's to run scanning software that'll hack into people's machines and store all their super secret information. What they're asking for is that these sorts of services be treated identically to the phone companies in this regard. They are required to keep phone records for a period of time for the exact same reasons.


The current problem is that since there isn't any regulation, most open wireless access providers (like hotels and internet cafes) don't keep any connection records at all. Which means that even when police trace someone, and get a subpoena for the records, there aren't any to collect. Leaving them to wait until they see online activity again, often only to repeat the process over and over.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#8 Feb 20 2009 at 5:50 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

The records they're talking about are pretty basic. It's not like they're requiring internet cafe's to run scanning software that'll hack into people's machines and store all their super secret information. What they're asking for is that these sorts of services be treated identically to the phone companies in this regard. They are required to keep phone records for a period of time for the exact same reasons.


It's as perfectly reasonable as requiring private car owners to keep a manifest of people they transport and requiring them to log ID information.

There's no "ignorance" here. Who benefits from this? It's not complicated to discover who wrote this bill and for what purpose.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 193 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (193)