Pensive wrote:
It's because you're moderate about a lot of stuff. You get confused easily with the opposition, whoever it may be. Tricksy ******* you are.
Maybe I should fill my posts with more vitriol, so my posts are easier to distinguish.
Or go back to what I used to do, pick a side that's in the middle of the other two but in a different way - e.g. the time I argued, using the evidence from the left side (that nukes did more damage than an invasion would have), that the US was right to nuke Japan (conclusion of right side) because it killed as many Japanese people as possible, and that the Japanese people deserved to suffer because they supported their Emperor's attacks on the US. No one else is likely to make a similar argument, so I should be OK. Probably best not to try it IRL, though.