Pensive wrote:
Quote:
You mean some of you are hypocritically saying that an animal's life is the same worth as a human's?
I do, but not hypocritically.
Quote:
Noo, you wouldn't be saying that or you wouldn't advocate getting rid of a pet because you're having a baby or throw the cat outside to fend for itself because little Billy's parents can't be assed to get the kid treated for allergies.
I don't.
My mother's deathly allergic to cats, but we've had ours for 16 years (she got worse over time). We deal with it. Getting rid of the cat would mean getting rid of me.
Pen, it wasn't aimed at you. Some of the posters here in the Asylum have said they'd throw out a family pet if little Suzy turned out to be allergic. I just find it ironic that they are now saying a cat's life is worth as much as a humans in this situation but not the other.
I agree with you. If it turned out KatieSpawn were allergic, I'd haul their asses down to the nearest allergy specialist to be treated. I'm totally saying a pet is a family member and should be treated as such.
Also, this guy is a sick **** and I hope he gets treatment.