Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Mommy rantFollow

#52 Feb 16 2009 at 4:57 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?


myth that when Brittish soldiers carried out sabotage missions or whatever in WW2 that as part of their "removing all identifying markings" thing they didn't wear pants.


I've never had my name stitched into my underpants. Ever.


They were more worried about DNA testing from the ***** stains.
#53 Feb 16 2009 at 5:17 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Majivo wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?


myth that when Brittish soldiers carried out sabotage missions or whatever in WW2 that as part of their "removing all identifying markings" thing they didn't wear pants.


I've never had my name stitched into my underpants. Ever.


They were more worried about DNA testing from the ***** stains.


WW2 though, DNA profiling, "genetc fingerprinting" wasn't available then. The two people who are credited with developing the technique weren't even born around that time.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#54 Feb 16 2009 at 5:27 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?


myth that when Brittish soldiers carried out sabotage missions or whatever in WW2 that as part of their "removing all identifying markings" thing they didn't wear pants.


I've never had my name stitched into my underpants. Ever.


Well someday you may find your children if you're lucky to reproduce sewing labels in all your garments after you're place in a nursing home. I found a ribbon of them with my grandmother's name, among my mom's sewing supplies, from back when she was in a nursing home.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#55 Feb 16 2009 at 5:30 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
ElneClare wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?


myth that when Brittish soldiers carried out sabotage missions or whatever in WW2 that as part of their "removing all identifying markings" thing they didn't wear pants.


I've never had my name stitched into my underpants. Ever.


Well someday you may find your children if you're lucky to reproduce sewing labels in all your garments after you're place in a nursing home. I found a ribbon of them with my grandmother's name, among my mom's sewing supplies, from back when she was in a nursing home.


I've had hotels do my laundry before. They always come back with tags in the pants and on the shirts. I'd occasionally forget to remove them, and half way through the work day feel something odd scratching the back of my neck or poking me in the side.

It'd be a little green tag with my last name and room number. I hate them so much.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#56REDACTED, Posted: Feb 17 2009 at 11:34 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Nexa,
#57 Feb 17 2009 at 11:39 AM Rating: Excellent
dupeeconqr wrote:
Nexa,

So let me get this straight; you were negligent in properly clothing your child, whatever the excuse may be, and the teachers aid rudely brings this to your attention and your response is to rail at the aid and cause her as much grief as you possibly can?

Didn't I see this scene in it's a wonderful life? So when does Smashed start cursing the teacher on the phone?


Not... exactly. The child was properly clothed, there was wasn't a spare pair of under garments at the preschool. That's a bit of a difference.
#58 Feb 17 2009 at 2:14 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I've never had my name stitched into my underpants. Ever.


Neither did they. I think the idea was more that it shouldn't be obvious the clothing in question was made in the UK. Again, let me repeat it was a myth, ie: something that did not actually occur.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#59 Feb 17 2009 at 2:19 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
it was a myth, ie: something that did not actually occur.


Whereas this (on googling) seems to have credence:

I wrote:
I always believed it was the US Commandos reworking the Scottish term "Regimental" (A Kilt worn properly, with none of yer sassenach namby-pamby knickers)
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#60 Feb 17 2009 at 2:28 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Whereas this (on googling) seems to have credence:


How would that have morphed to "commando"?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#61 Feb 17 2009 at 2:32 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Whereas this (on googling) seems to have credence:


How would that have morphed to "commando"?
The term was widely used by the Jimmy McJockos for decades if not centuries. Maybe when the Commandos fought alongside the Scots, they stole and americanised the term , like they did with our wimminz?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#62 Feb 17 2009 at 2:36 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
The term was widely used by the Jimmy McJockos for decades if not centuries. Maybe when the Commandos fought alongside the Scots, they stole and americanised the term , like they did with our wimminz?p

That seems plausible. An englishwomen seeing an erect ***** while not in a room full of naked men would likely do almost anything.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#63 Feb 17 2009 at 4:51 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
The term was widely used by the Jimmy McJockos for decades if not centuries. Maybe when the Commandos fought alongside the Scots, they stole and americanised the term , like they did with our wimminz?p

That seems plausible. An englishwomen seeing an erect ***** while not in a room full of naked men would likely do almost anything.



Hmmm, I think I need to visit England.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#64 Feb 18 2009 at 1:21 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
England is not Scotland, ye t'ick Mick
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#65 Feb 18 2009 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Majivo wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?


myth that when Brittish soldiers carried out sabotage missions or whatever in WW2 that as part of their "removing all identifying markings" thing they didn't wear pants.


I've never had my name stitched into my underpants. Ever.


They were more worried about DNA testing from the ***** stains.


WW2 though, DNA profiling, "genetc fingerprinting" wasn't available then. The two people who are credited with developing the technique weren't even born around that time.


And not every Englishman would come in his pants from killing an enemy, either, but the joke works better when you don't look too closely.
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 347 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (347)