Forum Settings
       
1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Mommy rantFollow

QuoteReply
#27 Feb 16 2009 at 1:05 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1649636418093
View User Forum
Sage
******
30,646 posts
Nexa wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

This is probably why I shouldn't be listed as an emergency contace for anyone.


True. I guess I have some contact list options to change, hahahhaha.

Nexa


It occurs to me that Smash could make some decent money allowing people to list him as a contact for certain organizations...
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#28 Feb 16 2009 at 1:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Smasharoo
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

What kind of daycare doesn't at least have a handful of extra clothes? Is it too much of a budget strain to go to a second hand store and pick out a dozen or so pieces of clothing? Hell you could even ask for small donations from the parents to pool together for such an occasion. They could charge parents for the clothing when it's needed. That alone might be enough to help the 'forgetful' parents to bring in their own extra clothing.

That's a great idea. Then, when they're closing the daycare because of the settlement from the first lawsuit where a kid gets a rash from the "loaner" underclothing, they can have a bake sale to throw a going away party for the administrators who thought this would be a good idea.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#29 Feb 16 2009 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Darqflame
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
Smash I love your ideas, can I add you as Kai's uncle and emergency contact? ROFL
____________________________

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#30 Feb 16 2009 at 1:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
What kind of daycare doesn't at least have a handful of extra clothes? Is it too much of a budget strain to go to a second hand store and pick out a dozen or so pieces of clothing? Hell you could even ask for small donations from the parents to pool together for such an occasion. They could charge parents for the clothing when it's needed. That alone might be enough to help the 'forgetful' parents to bring in their own extra clothing.


haha, they do have extra clothes...just not extra underpants in the preschool with the kids who are still learning potty-training.

Eww.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#31 Feb 16 2009 at 1:31 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1613953020893
Scholar
***
2,453 posts
Dirty hippy kids don't need no underwear no how.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#32 Feb 16 2009 at 1:33 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1622420402685
Scholar
*****
19,369 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

What kind of daycare doesn't at least have a handful of extra clothes? Is it too much of a budget strain to go to a second hand store and pick out a dozen or so pieces of clothing? Hell you could even ask for small donations from the parents to pool together for such an occasion. They could charge parents for the clothing when it's needed. That alone might be enough to help the 'forgetful' parents to bring in their own extra clothing.

That's a great idea. Then, when they're closing the daycare because of the settlement from the first lawsuit where a kid gets a rash from the "loaner" underclothing, they can have a bake sale to throw a going away party for the administrators who thought this would be a good idea.



Because there's no possible way to clean and disinfect second hand items. If a daycare is careless enough to obtain second hand items without sanitizing them prior to use then I'd hate to see how careless they were with their other cleaning practices or lack of.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#33 Feb 16 2009 at 1:40 PM Rating: Good
Smasharoo
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Because there's no possible way to clean and disinfect second hand items. If a daycare is careless enough to obtain second hand items without sanitizing them prior to use then I'd hate to see how careless they were with their other cleaning practices or lack of.

You're under the impression that there would have to be actual liability for some whacko parent to sue? How fucking ADORABLE!!
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#34 Feb 16 2009 at 1:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Darqflame
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
MentalFrog wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

What kind of daycare doesn't at least have a handful of extra clothes? Is it too much of a budget strain to go to a second hand store and pick out a dozen or so pieces of clothing? Hell you could even ask for small donations from the parents to pool together for such an occasion. They could charge parents for the clothing when it's needed. That alone might be enough to help the 'forgetful' parents to bring in their own extra clothing.

That's a great idea. Then, when they're closing the daycare because of the settlement from the first lawsuit where a kid gets a rash from the "loaner" underclothing, they can have a bake sale to throw a going away party for the administrators who thought this would be a good idea.



Because there's no possible way to clean and disinfect second hand items. If a daycare is careless enough to obtain second hand items without sanitizing them prior to use then I'd hate to see how careless they were with their other cleaning practices or lack of.


You'd be amazed at where daycare's get their extra clothing, they also buy a lot of bleach.
____________________________

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#35 Feb 16 2009 at 1:45 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1622420402685
Scholar
*****
19,369 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Because there's no possible way to clean and disinfect second hand items. If a daycare is careless enough to obtain second hand items without sanitizing them prior to use then I'd hate to see how careless they were with their other cleaning practices or lack of.

You're under the impression that there would have to be actual liability for some whacko parent to sue? How fucking ADORABLE!!


More that a daycare would be oblivious to common cleaning tactics.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#36 Feb 16 2009 at 1:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Smasharoo
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

More that a daycare would be oblivious to common cleaning tactics.

Fuck, you're slow. No daycare is going to provide anything that touches a child's genitals that isn't brand new, hermetically sealed in some sort of packaging. Because this is America and juries lose their minds when they think of tiny penises and vaginas.

Understand yet? They're not going to provide underclothing or bathing suits or cloth diapers, or whatever.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#37 Feb 16 2009 at 1:53 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1622420402685
Scholar
*****
19,369 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

More that a daycare would be oblivious to common cleaning tactics.

Fuck, you're slow. No daycare is going to provide anything that touches a child's genitals that isn't brand new, hermetically sealed in some sort of packaging. Because this is America and juries lose their minds when they think of tiny penises and vaginas.

Understand yet? They're not going to provide underclothing or bathing suits or cloth diapers, or whatever.


So charge an extra fee. Problem solved.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#38 Feb 16 2009 at 1:54 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1649636418093
View User Forum
Sage
******
30,646 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

More that a daycare would be oblivious to common cleaning tactics.

Fuck, you're slow. No daycare is going to provide anything that touches a child's genitals that isn't brand new, hermetically sealed in some sort of packaging. Because this is America and juries lose their minds when they think of tiny penises and vaginas.

Understand yet? They're not going to provide underclothing or bathing suits or cloth diapers, or whatever.


So charge an extra fee. Problem solved.


Smiley: lol Smiley: dubious
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#39 Feb 16 2009 at 1:55 PM Rating: Good
Smasharoo
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

So charge an extra fee. Problem solved.

Which problem does this solve? You think they should stock new, unopened underclothing in a range of children's sizes, and charge parents for when they need to be used?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#40 Feb 16 2009 at 1:56 PM Rating: Decent
Elinda
View User Forum
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

What kind of daycare doesn't at least have a handful of extra clothes? Is it too much of a budget strain to go to a second hand store and pick out a dozen or so pieces of clothing? Hell you could even ask for small donations from the parents to pool together for such an occasion. They could charge parents for the clothing when it's needed. That alone might be enough to help the 'forgetful' parents to bring in their own extra clothing.

That's a great idea. Then, when they're closing the daycare because of the settlement from the first lawsuit where a kid gets a rash from the "loaner" underclothing, they can have a bake sale to throw a going away party for the administrators who thought this would be a good idea.



Because there's no possible way to clean and disinfect second hand items. If a daycare is careless enough to obtain second hand items without sanitizing them prior to use then I'd hate to see how careless they were with their other cleaning practices or lack of.
Pull-ups Duh.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#41 Feb 16 2009 at 1:58 PM Rating: Good
Nobby
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
commando
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#42 Feb 16 2009 at 1:59 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1622420402685
Scholar
*****
19,369 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

So charge an extra fee. Problem solved.

Which problem does this solve? You think they should stock new, unopened underclothing in a range of children's sizes, and charge parents for when they need to be used?


Prior to be being needed.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#43 Feb 16 2009 at 2:10 PM Rating: Decent
Smasharoo
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Prior to be being needed.

So charge parents for underclothing their children may not need? Can you see why this might not be a good idea in a free market when given the option of just asking the parents to bring underclothing from home with the understanding that if they don't their kid will go without for the day if required?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#44 Feb 16 2009 at 2:16 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1622420402685
Scholar
*****
19,369 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Prior to be being needed.

So charge parents for underclothing their children may not need? Can you see why this might not be a good idea in a free market when given the option of just asking the parents to bring underclothing from home with the understanding that if they don't their kid will go without for the day if required?



This wouldn't be a problem if parents remembered to bring their own extra clothes.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#45 Feb 16 2009 at 2:17 PM Rating: Good
Smasharoo
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

This wouldn't be a problem if parents remembered to bring their own extra clothes.

It's not a problem, regardless. Do you see why?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#46 Feb 16 2009 at 2:32 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1591962888149
Sage
***
2,086 posts
Nexa, I would be upset too. What a waste of time and you find people like that everywhere.

Nobby wrote:
commando


I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#47 Feb 16 2009 at 2:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Smasharoo
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?

myth that when Brittish soldiers carried out sabotage missions or whatever in WW2 that as part of their "removing all identifying markings" thing they didn't wear pants.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#48 Feb 16 2009 at 2:44 PM Rating: Good
Nobby
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?

myth that when Brittish soldiers carried out sabotage missions or whatever in WW2 that as part of their "removing all identifying markings" thing they didn't wear pants.
I always believed it was the US Commandos reworking the Scottish term "Regimental" (A Kilt worn properly, with none of yer sassenach namby-pamby knickers)
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#49 Feb 16 2009 at 2:53 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1591962888149
Sage
***
2,086 posts
Nobby wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?

myth that when Brittish soldiers carried out sabotage missions or whatever in WW2 that as part of their "removing all identifying markings" thing they didn't wear pants.
I always believed it was the US Commandos reworking the Scottish term "Regimental" (A Kilt worn properly, with none of yer sassenach namby-pamby knickers)


You know what is really odd about Kilts? I either think of BraveHeart/Highlander Smiley: inlove Or Carry On films and the Kyber Pass Smiley: eek

Smasharoo, thank you for that explanation. So 007 was a commando once? Smiley: smile
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#50 Feb 16 2009 at 2:58 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1680481127345
View User Forum
Sage
******
21,262 posts
These days they'd have to test second hand clothes for lead anyway.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#51 Feb 16 2009 at 4:48 PM Rating: Decent
TirithRR
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

I always wanted to ask, where did that slang phrase originate from?

myth that when Brittish soldiers carried out sabotage missions or whatever in WW2 that as part of their "removing all identifying markings" thing they didn't wear pants.


I've never had my name stitched into my underpants. Ever.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
▲ Page top
1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 347 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (347)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC