Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Not kill off the space program? Failing that, at least move ahead with a space shuttle replacement that isn't a !@#$%^& throwback capsule design.
The numbers I've heard indicate it would be about 10 times cheaper to go back to capsules. My understanding is the soviets made a shuttle, launched it once, realized it was way too expensive and went back to capsules. I'm not saying there aren't better designs out there. I've heard a small shuttle-like device for humans plus a larger payload (no humans) launcher would be vastly better (cheaper, could lift more, etc).
That said, for science, human space flight has very little value. The shining moment for humans in space (for pure science) was to fix the hubble. Of course there are other reasons for humans to be in space. And I support those despite the fact that budget could do so much for science.
At the end of the day, however, those who want science fiction come to life should put more into the NSF.