Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

One wish...Follow

#1 Jan 23 2009 at 12:05 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Any single thing the Obama administration, current congress (and if you're feeling ambitious, this session of the SCOTUS) can accomplish this session. Presidency: Next four years, Congress, next two.

Just one each.
#2 Jan 23 2009 at 2:24 AM Rating: Good
I'll go for the international angle, since domestic politics doesn't affect me all that much.

My biggest wish would be that Obama starts working on a two-state solution in Israel/Paletine, now. Or at least, after the Israeli elections in Feb. As opposed to the very end of his Presidency, as is usually the case. And hopefully, this time, we can implement the solution that all parties agree needs to be implemented. The theory is all there, and everyone pretty much agrees on what needs to be done. I have no doubt this would be the start of a virtuous cycle in the ME. Israel could then normalise some of its relations with neighbouring Arab countries, and maybe, just maybe, the region would be a tiny bit more stable.

Also, if he really is the Messiah, he should feel right at home in the ME. So yeah, no giganticly unrealistic expectations, or anything.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#3 Jan 23 2009 at 7:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Not kill off the space program? Failing that, at least move ahead with a space shuttle replacement that isn't a !@#$%^& throwback capsule design.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#4 Jan 23 2009 at 7:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
All good suggestions. I'll throw in a wish for him and Biden and whoever else is good at twisting arms to do what they can to free up the credit/bailout logjam and get banks lending again.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#5 Jan 23 2009 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
They need to do something about increasing funding for higher education, especially for people who end up working in the public sector.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#6 Jan 23 2009 at 7:56 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Baron von Annabella wrote:
They need to do something about increasing funding for higher education, especially for people who end up working in the public sector.
I agree with this. It's disgusting how much more expensive University is in the US vs Canada. Tuition in Canada might cost you $30k for 4 year.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#7 Jan 23 2009 at 9:45 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Perhaps, to eliminate as many traces of religion from public policy as possible.


Sort of inane to have to pick just one though :P

Edit: oops, should have read the OP more carefully. Oh well, this is all you get.



Edited, Jan 23rd 2009 4:16pm by trickybeck
#8 Jan 23 2009 at 9:47 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Uglysasquatch, ****** Superhero wrote:
Baron von Annabella wrote:
They need to do something about increasing funding for higher education, especially for people who end up working in the public sector.
I agree with this. It's disgusting how much more expensive University is in the US vs Canada. Tuition in Canada might cost you $30k for 4 year.
Really? Maybe I should study in Canuckia...
#9 Jan 23 2009 at 9:49 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Nothing original here:

Israel & Palestine diplomacy with initiation of discussions with other Middle-Eastern & Arab states

Reinvigorate public lending (either guarantees or pump-priming capital)
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#10 Jan 23 2009 at 10:01 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
NPR was talking this morning about the possible creation of a "Bad Bank." Apparently sorta similar to the original plan of the government buying up all of those "toxic" assets. They set up an entity that buys up the bad stuff, then they attempt to recover as much of the loss as possible. Whereas with the original TARP plan, the government would just eat the losses directly, in fact they were even going to overpay for those assets to "convince the banks to go for it."

I think the original plan was going to be a huge, huge benefit for the banks, and now that it has been changed, they're being pissy and not lending.
#11 Jan 23 2009 at 10:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
In a sense, the economy has to be the #1 answer. If we're doing better in 2012 than we are now, everything else feels like gravy and the administration can get a lot done. If we're all in bread lines in 2012, no one is going to give a fuck about cheaper college or what's going on in Israel.

That said, by 2012 (President) I'd love to see some sort of substantial health care reform in place.
By 2010, I'd like to see Congress pass through a strong reform of No Child Left Behind which attempts to fix its many flaws
By 2012, I'd like to see Roberts, Alito, Scalia & Thomas all decide to retire from the Supreme Court Smiley: wink2
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#12 Jan 23 2009 at 1:40 PM Rating: Decent
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Not kill off the space program? Failing that, at least move ahead with a space shuttle replacement that isn't a !@#$%^& throwback capsule design.


The numbers I've heard indicate it would be about 10 times cheaper to go back to capsules. My understanding is the soviets made a shuttle, launched it once, realized it was way too expensive and went back to capsules. I'm not saying there aren't better designs out there. I've heard a small shuttle-like device for humans plus a larger payload (no humans) launcher would be vastly better (cheaper, could lift more, etc).

That said, for science, human space flight has very little value. The shining moment for humans in space (for pure science) was to fix the hubble. Of course there are other reasons for humans to be in space. And I support those despite the fact that budget could do so much for science.

At the end of the day, however, those who want science fiction come to life should put more into the NSF.
#13 Jan 23 2009 at 1:40 PM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Uglysasquatch, ****** Superhero wrote:
Baron von Annabella wrote:
They need to do something about increasing funding for higher education, especially for people who end up working in the public sector.
I agree with this. It's disgusting how much more expensive University is in the US vs Canada. Tuition in Canada might cost you $30k for 4 year.
Really? Maybe I should study in Canuckia...


You'd have to become a citizen to get the discount. They normally charge imports ~ 4 times as much.
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#14 Jan 23 2009 at 1:48 PM Rating: Decent
Uglysasquatch, ****** Superhero wrote:
Baron von Annabella wrote:
They need to do something about increasing funding for higher education, especially for people who end up working in the public sector.
I agree with this. It's disgusting how much more expensive University is in the US vs Canada. Tuition in Canada might cost you $30k for 4 year.


Tuition to the University of California (UC) system is about US$5000/year. Cal State system is like US$4000/year. The community college system is very cheap and there is a program for ensured transfer from community college to a UC school (with good grades). California is large, but there are about 10 UC campuses plus 23 state ones and a ton of community colleges (like 100), so they are very accessible. There are also many ways to get financial help, although some are unsavory. (Note: tuition doesn't include room and board. If that would be included in Canada, that is a large difference for those moving away from home.)
#15 Jan 23 2009 at 2:00 PM Rating: Decent
Paskil wrote:
Any single thing the Obama administration, current congress (and if you're feeling ambitious, this session of the SCOTUS) can accomplish this session. Presidency: Next four years, Congress, next two.

Just one each.


Very unlikely to happen:

Congress: eliminate all mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines. Let states work that one out. Way too skewed.

Supreme Court: reverse position on campaign finance reform.

President: I'm not sure even the plutonic form of peace negotiator could help people fundamentally at odds. Thus instead I recommend the following: vastly reduce the size of the military and pull back from most foreign non-combat areas. Force future leaders to either draft an army for large operations or garner more cooperation from allies. As a side benefit, allies will likely increase military spending to replace the American presence as we leave.
#16 Jan 23 2009 at 5:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
yossarian wrote:


The numbers I've heard indicate it would be about 10 times cheaper to go back to capsules. My understanding is the soviets made a shuttle, launched it once, realized it was way too expensive and went back to capsules. I'm not saying there aren't better designs out there. I've heard a small shuttle-like device for humans plus a larger payload (no humans) launcher would be vastly better (cheaper, could lift more, etc).

That said, for science, human space flight has very little value. The shining moment for humans in space (for pure science) was to fix the hubble. Of course there are other reasons for humans to be in space. And I support those despite the fact that budget could do so much for science.

At the end of the day, however, those who want science fiction come to life should put more into the NSF.


The Soviet Buran shuttles were never launched because the funds for their fuel tanks and boosters was cut in favor of the Mir station. Yes, the shuttle as it exists currently is expensive. Much of that is in the maintenance and upkeep costs. Back when the shuttle was made we didn't have the technology to create large precision ceramic surfaces easily, and those we could produce were very brittle. Maintianing those tiles is one of the most expensive portions of space shuttle operation. The other cost is the fuel tanks and reloading the solid rocket boosters. With a 2 stage to orbit aircraft mothership/shuttle package, you would have far lower operating costs than from a conventional shuttle, increased safety, higher payload and return capacity. Or they could dust off the Venture star prototype. The problems with that design were fixable, and its substantially complete. Anything but a poorly designed capsule.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#17 Jan 23 2009 at 6:28 PM Rating: Good
***
3,212 posts
I want to see some sort of health care plan for people that would allow ELne Clare and I to get married. Currently I dont make enough to carry her on my work plan.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 275 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (275)