Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

I've never wanted a Ford beforeFollow

#27 Jan 19 2009 at 9:25 AM Rating: Decent
Nobby wrote:
Flixa wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qliBV6w_USs the steering wheel is on the wrong side.
What a mind-blowingly unoriginal and crap post! Smiley: thumbsup


So he's improving, then.
#28 Jan 19 2009 at 9:27 AM Rating: Decent
Screenshot

Here is the ride I recently picked up. Not quite an Astra TwinTop, but a man can dream. Sorry to derail your Ford thread Nexa.

Edited, Jan 19th 2009 12:27pm by Araxius
#29 Jan 19 2009 at 12:03 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Araxius, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Screenshot

Here is the ride I recently picked up. Not quite an Astra TwinTop, but a man can dream. Sorry to derail your Ford thread Nexa.
Never been a fan of Japanese cars, but the 350z has really grown on me.

Also, it would leave me standing Smiley: glare
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#30 Jan 19 2009 at 12:05 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
So you went and got the Z? You're going to love/regret that. Enjoy.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#31 Jan 19 2009 at 12:09 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Uglysasquatch, ****** Superhero wrote:
So you went and got the Z? You're going to love/regret that. Enjoy.
They're similar to the Aston Martin and the Alfa-Romeo.

A petrol-head's car - when behaving, a delight and a joy - enough to put up with the quirkiness
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#32 Jan 19 2009 at 1:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Alright, now i'm torn. Ford class nucelar powered aircraft carrier, or the "just in case obama turns out to be an evil robot android bent on world dominion truck" that drives just behind his presidential limo.

http://jalopnik.com/5134488/presidential-gatling-gun+equipped-suburban-badder-than-new-cadillac-limo
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#33 Jan 19 2009 at 1:44 PM Rating: Decent
Uglysasquatch, ****** Superhero wrote:
So you went and got the Z? You're going to love/regret that. Enjoy.


Yep I love it already. I had to drive it a couple miles in the snow last night. That was a joy let me tell you. The guy that traded in the 350Z I bought, got this brand new from the same dealership.

Screenshot
#34 Jan 19 2009 at 3:18 PM Rating: Decent
#35 Jan 19 2009 at 3:19 PM Rating: Decent
And no, that is not mine, But I have one that will look like that when I get finished with it.
#36 Jan 20 2009 at 6:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts


I love Arax's car, but THAT turns me on!
____________________________

#38 Jan 20 2009 at 9:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
WarMaverick wrote:
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
You can have that one, I'll take one of these!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_R._Ford_class_aircraft_carrier


Ok, so can someone enlighten me, why is it exactly that we need new aircraft carriers? Without going on a rant, it just seems like a huge waste of money. Are we preparing for a naval campaign in the Pacific or something?


Several reasons. The oldest Nimitz class carrier will begin reaching old age about the time the first one of these is ready for sea trials. So we really won't be getting more aircraft carriers, we'll just be replacing them as they age.

The new class carriers have several important upgrades over the old ones:
1. They use electromagnetic aircraft catepults and arresting gear. The electromagnetic system is about 1/500th the size of the older steam system, and eliminates literally 1/32nd of the weight of the older nimitz design just by removing the steam pipes and boilers. This is also a huge savings in maintenance costs. Steam is corrosive over time, and pipes are easy to damage when the aircraft carrier is under attack.

2. A complete rebuild of the electrical grid. The oldest nimitz class carriers use a proprietary military specification that was designed before anything like anti missile lasers was even considered remotely possible. They are pretty much at the limit of their electrical generation capability, and the electrical grid lacks redundant paths and excess capacity for future upgrades. By going with the new design, which uses more standard components and is much more efficient and robust, along with new generation reactors, the capacity to launch aircraft is increased and the ability to add up and coming weapons systems easily is preserved.

3. The new carriers are larger, but incorporate more automation, requireing a smaller crew. Les people we need to pay, or more people available for other ships.

4. With the steam system eliminated, there is more room for aviation gas and munitions for the aircraft.

5. The nimitz design is at it's weight limit. You really can't add any systems to it without risking it being too heavy and sinking. The ford class design has additional capacity built in.

____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#39 Jan 20 2009 at 9:59 AM Rating: Decent
I can't say I really see the point of replacing all ten. It's not like it's the cold war anymore. The US hardly needs to maintain its six-to-one aircaft carrier ratio over the closest competitor - especially seeing as both the new and old carriers carry about two to three times as many fighters as other countries' carriers.
#40 Jan 20 2009 at 5:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
So which area of the planet would you like us to not have covered by an aircraft carrier then? Middle east maybe? South asia? East or west coast? Africa? It's a big ******* ocean...
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#41 Jan 20 2009 at 7:12 PM Rating: Default
nissan 4 lyfe

http://gallery.azzido.no/albums/S13-5-Silvia/s13_silvia_11.sized.jpg
#42 Jan 21 2009 at 6:13 AM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
WarMaverick wrote:
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
You can have that one, I'll take one of these!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_R._Ford_class_aircraft_carrier


Ok, so can someone enlighten me, why is it exactly that we need new aircraft carriers? Without going on a rant, it just seems like a huge waste of money. Are we preparing for a naval campaign in the Pacific or something?


Several reasons. The oldest Nimitz class carrier will begin reaching old age about the time the first one of these is ready for sea trials. So we really won't be getting more aircraft carriers, we'll just be replacing them as they age.




My nephew in navy is currently in Norfolk being train as Nuclear tect on the USS Enterprise and from what he saids about about the different systems he has to learn about, I think replacing all the aircraft carriers with new design makes lots of sense.

____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#43 Jan 21 2009 at 6:31 AM Rating: Decent
****
6,580 posts
Mistress Darqflame wrote:


I love Arax's car, but THAT turns me on!

So ******* unfair. Why don't we get real muscle cars in the UK? The closest thing we have to a a REAL old muscle car is a bloody Ford Capri.

It's probably the best of the old UK pseudo-muscle cars. Not that that’s much to shout about. That’s like saying ‘Oh good, I’ve got syphilis, the best of the STD's!'
#44 Jan 21 2009 at 9:40 AM Rating: Decent
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
So which area of the planet would you like us to not have covered by an aircraft carrier then? Middle east maybe? South asia? East or west coast? Africa? It's a big @#%^ing ocean...


If America can't respond with deadly force to a problem anywhere in the world in under 6 days who knows what evils the savages that populate the rest of the Earth will get up to?
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 285 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (285)