Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Is Obama Going to Go Bush When He's Prez?Follow

#77 Jan 17 2009 at 5:12 PM Rating: Decent
Lady GwynapNud wrote:
Sorry to step in but I thought I would advertise that a ceasefire was announced today Smiley: smile


You were beaten to the punch a few posts up.
#78 Jan 17 2009 at 6:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Well, Israel announced a ceasefire.

Hamas swore to continue fighting and firing rockets into Israel.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#79 Jan 17 2009 at 7:39 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Well, Israel announced a ceasefire.

Hamas swore to continue fighting and firing rockets into Israel.


That's what I said.
#80 Jan 17 2009 at 8:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I was responding more to Gwyn. Although you didn't explicitly mention Hamas swearing to continue attacking Israel either.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#81 Jan 18 2009 at 3:49 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Well, Israel announced a ceasefire.

Hamas swore to continue fighting and firing rockets into Israel.


True, but Hamas wasn't included in the cease-fire discussions. Israel does not want a two-way cease-fire,since this would be seen as giving legitimacy to a "terrorist group". And Israeli soldiers will remain be in Gaza. And they will shoot back if being shot at.

So it's less of a cease-fire than Israel agreeing to stop kicking the **** out of Gaza, for now. But hey, Hamas has been thoroughly defeated, rockets have stopped being launched from Gaza to Israel, and everything in the region is much better than it was before the war. Or, wait...
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#82 Jan 18 2009 at 6:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Hamas wasn't included in the cease-fire discussions
Hamas wanted a bunch of concessions for a ceasefire. What they get is to stop having Gaza blown up. Let's see if they give more of a shit about the Palestinians or about getting their way. If they don't like Israeli soldiers kicking around who, gasp, shoot back when shot at, that was something to think about before launching the rockets.
Quote:
But hey, Hamas has been thoroughly defeated, rockets have stopped being launched from Gaza to Israel, and everything in the region is much better than it was before the war. Or, wait...
Good point. Someone tell Israel to keep at it Smiley: laugh

Edited, Jan 18th 2009 8:27am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#83 Jan 18 2009 at 10:17 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Hamas wasn't included in the cease-fire discussions
Hamas wanted a bunch of concessions for a ceasefire.


No, Hamas was never going to be included in the cease-fire, since the whole point of the exercise was to destroy Hamas. How could they then set them up as partner for peace=making? Unless part of the cease-fire would be that Hamas would self-destruct after signing the agreement.


Quote:
Quote:
But hey, Hamas has been thoroughly defeated, rockets have stopped being launched from Gaza to Israel, and everything in the region is much better than it was before the war. Or, wait...
Good point. Someone tell Israel to keep at it Smiley: laugh


Well they could, and it still wouldn't improve anything. Rockets are still being launched from Gaza. Hamas is still there. All this death and destruction, for what? What has it achieved? Except killing people and destroying property, what has it achieved? Is Israel safer? Are we?

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#84 Jan 18 2009 at 11:15 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts

Quote:
Well they could, and it still wouldn't improve anything. Rockets are still being launched from Gaza. Hamas is still there. All this death and destruction, for what? What has it achieved? Except killing people and destroying property, what has it achieved? Is Israel safer? Are we?


For what? Well all that death and destruction and misery has certainly kept Joph amused for a couple of weeks.

Quote:
Good point. Someone tell Israel to keep at it Smiley: laugh


Its funny, I thought he was a bit more enlightened than that.......


I guess he's turned over a new leaf for 2009.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#85 Jan 18 2009 at 12:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
RP wrote:
No, Hamas was never going to be included in the cease-fire
Hamas was never going to be included because Hamas demanded basically that Israel open up Gaza and completely withdraw from the region. Which would be insanity because there's absolutely no reason to believe that Hamas would do anything but use the breathing room to rearm and continue the struggle.
paulsol wrote:
Its funny, I thought he was a bit more enlightened than that.......
Screenshot

I'm pretty sure RP knew I was being tongue-in-cheek there & largely just tweaking him. He's probably even bright enough to have taken the laughing face as a hint. Maybe someday when you're more "enlightened" you'll be able to figure these things out too! Smiley: smile

Until then, I'll continue to be wounded that you thought I was "amused" by it all. Really, the barbs sting but I'll find a way to carry on.

Edited, Jan 18th 2009 2:07pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#86 Jan 18 2009 at 12:17 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
So once the Black Neo is in office and things don't change quite how you hoped them for them to, are you going to be disappointed and call for his head as you did Dubya?

Obama is about to enter the very murky world of the Oval Office; and you, his supporters are about to witness how pragmatism and reality force on Presidents a change they never promised to their constituents.


You think that maybe his mouth wrote some checks his *** won't be able to cash? Surely not!

Yeah, he's already pissed off some of the sheeple that voted for him.

#87 Jan 18 2009 at 12:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Using witty terms such as "Sheeple" is the quickest way to gain credibility.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#88 Jan 18 2009 at 12:23 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Using witty terms such as "Sheeple" is the quickest way to gain credibility.


Well, I guess he's just happy that now the other side can be called Sheeple for the next 8 years.

Probably a little sore after all this.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#89 Jan 18 2009 at 12:34 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Tilar wrote:
Yeah, he's already pissed off some of the sheeple that voted for him.

If they're pissed off, they are, eo ipso, not sheep.

I've been a long time Obama supporter, but there's things I dislike about him. His gay marriage policy, Rick Warren, etc.

#90 Jan 18 2009 at 12:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
In Tricky's perfect world, Obama would be married to Rick Warren.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#91 Jan 18 2009 at 7:16 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
No, Hamas was never going to be included in the cease-fire, since the whole point of the exercise was to destroy Hamas. How could they then set them up as partner for peace=making? Unless part of the cease-fire would be that Hamas would self-destruct after signing the agreement.

I thought that's what Hamas wanted of Israel?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#92 Jan 19 2009 at 3:06 PM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:
Using witty terms such as "Sheeple" is the quickest way to gain credibility.


If I gave the impression that I was seeking credibility from anyone, I sure didn't mean to.
#93 Jan 19 2009 at 7:10 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I forgot. Did someone actually make a comment about the obvious sexual connotation of the topic title?

Cause if not, um... tee hee...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#94 Jan 19 2009 at 7:30 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
I forgot. Did someone actually make a comment about the obvious sexual connotation of the topic title?


Did you just call Bush a cnut?

I'm gonna like 2009!
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#95 Jan 21 2009 at 3:56 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
So I take it everybody is ok with my Israel's rockets into Gaza solution for the next time Hamas starts instigating things again?

Awesome.

Totem
#96 Jan 21 2009 at 4:43 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
Totem wrote:
So I take it everybody is ok with my Israel's rockets into Gaza solution for the next time Hamas starts instigating things again?

Awesome.

Totem


Not really, because Israel's standard artillery rocket is eleventy bajillion times more powerful than Hamas' homemade crap. Hamas has only been hitting things by persistence and sheer weight of numbers. Assuming a 1:1 ratio, your solution would result in more Palestinian bloodshed. And more dead civilians, because the Israelis would be restricted to unguided rockets.
#97 Jan 21 2009 at 5:38 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Totem wrote:
So I take it everybody is ok with my Israel's rockets into Gaza solution for the next time Hamas starts instigating things again?

Awesome.

Totem

Sure thing. Hell, they should be using bigger rockets. With those special tips that they aren't supposed to use.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#98 Jan 21 2009 at 6:04 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
SpankerofMonkey wrote:

I'm not sure that they DID create a thousand more. I NEVER believed that killing civilians immediately bred terrorists. Sure, they gave Hamas and similar groups a new selling point, but believe it or not, they probably deterred as many terrorists as they created.


Um, no they didn't deter anyone. People are ******** that way. If you push them, they push back. If you push them harder, they hit you with a brick. Historically in similar situations, actions such as the recent events in Gaza, always help radicalize the population and drive people into the camp of the oppressed group. Its happened over and over... the American Revolution, the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, China, Northern Ireland, Vietnam, Iraq, et cetera ad nauseum.
#99 Jan 21 2009 at 7:32 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Deathwysh wrote:
SpankerofMonkey wrote:

I'm not sure that they DID create a thousand more. I NEVER believed that killing civilians immediately bred terrorists. Sure, they gave Hamas and similar groups a new selling point, but believe it or not, they probably deterred as many terrorists as they created.


Um, no they didn't deter anyone. People are @#%^s that way. If you push them, they push back. If you push them harder, they hit you with a brick. Historically in similar situations, actions such as the recent events in Gaza, always help radicalize the population and drive people into the camp of the oppressed group. Its happened over and over... the American Revolution, the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, China, Northern Ireland, Vietnam, Iraq, et cetera ad nauseum.


The situations are entirely different though. There's a huge difference between people who are fed up with whomever is ruling them and fighting against them, and people hating another group of people so much that they'll strap bombs to themselves in order to kill a bunch of them.


Israel completely pulled out of Gaza prior to this latest round of violence. They had not one soldier in that territory. Gaza acted completely on its own and continued to attempt to smuggle weapons and dig tunnels to attack Israel. Israel was not occupying them. They were not oppressing the population. At some point, you have to recognize that it's the leadership of the radical anti-Israel organizations who are causing this and not Israel. You also have to realize that no amount of half measures will prevent this. Israel has to eliminate those organizations. The people aren't the target.


There will always be pissed off and/or mentally disturbed people in any society. Plenty who, with enough encouragement and conditioning, can be convinced to do things like suicide bombings. When that is happening, your only solution is to get rid of the organizations training, supplying, and pointing those people at you. Arguing that this only alienates the population is a non-argument IMO.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#100 Jan 21 2009 at 9:59 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
They were not oppressing the population.


If you consider that keeping people captive in a huge open air prison with travel restrictions, restrictions on food supplies, medical supplies, access to eevn the most basic of health care,fuel for transport, gas for cooking, electricity for lighting, total control over everything that the peopple have access to, building a giant concrete wall thru their orchards and carving up the land they do have with roads that the captives cant cross without being shot at, not being oppressed, then sure,' they were not oppressing the population'.Smiley: oyvey



Edited, Jan 22nd 2009 6:00am by paulsol
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#101 Jan 21 2009 at 10:06 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
gbaji wrote:
The situations are entirely different though.
No they aren't.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 296 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (296)