Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Et tu, Andrew?Follow

#1 Dec 30 2008 at 8:13 AM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
The part of me that has been a Phantom of the Opera fan since early in high school is all YIPPEE!!! at the idea of a PotO sequel, but my inborn critic can't help but suspect this is a money-grubbing, "OMGWTF!!!! I haven't had a hit show in a decade" maneuver on Webber's part.

Either way, it may be time to go read Susan Kay's Phantom again, because she sewed up that particular tale just right.
#2 Dec 30 2008 at 2:46 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,162 posts
I wonder which song he's going to plagiarize this time.
#3 Dec 30 2008 at 2:54 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

The part of me that has been a Phantom of the Opera fan since early in high school is all YIPPEE!!! at the idea of a PotO sequel, but my inborn critic can't help but suspect this is a money-grubbing,


As opposed to the first time, where it was an altruistic artistic vision.

Webber's work is musical theater for idiots. It's like Lifetime started a musical channel before they got into the TV business.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 276 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (276)