Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Religious Figures Disapprove of Playboy (this month)Follow

#1 Dec 15 2008 at 1:06 PM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE4BE54F20081215

Quote:
By Alex Dobuzinskis

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A nude model resembling the Virgin Mary on the cover of the Mexican edition of Playboy magazine, published only days before a major Mexican festival dedicated to the mother of Jesus, prompted the company's U.S. headquarters on Friday to apologize.

The magazine, which hit newsstands on December 1 as ceremonies began leading to Friday's pilgrimage to the Mexico City shrine of the Virgin of Guadalupe, showed a model wearing nothing but a white cloth over her head and breasts.

She is standing in front of a stained glass window with the cover line, "We Love You, Maria" in Spanish. The model's name is Maria Florencia Onori.

The Virgin of Guadalupe, said to have appeared to a sixteenth century Indian peasant, is Mexico's most revered Roman Catholic figure and the annual pilgrimage to the Mexico City basilica dedicated to her is one of the world's largest religious events.

In a statement, Chicago-based Playboy Enterprises Inc said the Mexican edition of the magazine is published by a licensee, and the company did not approve or endorse the cover.

"While Playboy Mexico never meant for the cover or images to offend anyone, we recognize that it has created offense, and we as well as Playboy Mexico offer our sincerest apologies," the statement said.

Raul Sayrols, publisher of Playboy Mexico, said in a statement, "The image is not and never was intended to portray the Virgin of Guadalupe or any other religious figure. The intent was to reflect a Renaissance-like mood on the cover."

Playboy Mexico printed 100,000 copies of the issue.


Damn those Catholics.

The offending cover can be found here, somewhat NSFW I suppose, though they just showed the cover on CNN for about 30 seconds.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#2 Dec 15 2008 at 1:09 PM Rating: Good
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
lolreligioningeneral
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#3 Dec 15 2008 at 1:11 PM Rating: Good
That is so not NSFW! I have avatars more NSFW than that image. I can see how they might be offended but I really thing they should go back to reading their bibles more and Playboy less.
#4 Dec 15 2008 at 1:14 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Katielynn wrote:
That is so not NSFW! I have avatars more NSFW than that image. I can see how they might be offended but I really thing they should go back to reading their bibles more and Playboy less.
I didn't think it was but apparently half of Mexico shat bricks when they saw it so I guess it was more up for grabs than I had originally thought.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#5 Dec 15 2008 at 1:22 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,760 posts
I'd hit it.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#6 Dec 15 2008 at 1:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Playgirl should do a Muhammed spread.
#7 Dec 15 2008 at 1:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
It doesn't seem to say exactly who disapproved but, in a nation which is 76% Catholic, it's a good bet that it wasn't just a couple "Religious Figures".

Personally, I don't care but it seems like pretty bad business sense to put out a cover potentially viewed as denigrating someone who is arguably the most important figure in Hispanic Catholicism. Especially right before a major religious observation celebrating that figure. If having a nealry nude woman made up to resemble the Virgin in a religious setting who just happens to be named Maria was coincidence, it was a pretty unlucky one.

Edited, Dec 15th 2008 3:35pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Dec 15 2008 at 3:05 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
Now if tey really wanted to make it look like a Renaissance painting of the Madonna holding a nude baby Jesus, it would be NSFW Smiley: glare
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#9 Dec 15 2008 at 3:10 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
It doesn't seem to say exactly who disapproved but, in a nation which is 76% Catholic, it's a good bet that it wasn't just a couple "Religious Figures".


It seems strange that catholics would come into contact with a playboy magazine.
#10 Dec 15 2008 at 3:59 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
There is nothing "sexual" about it. Mary is obviously just getting ready to breast feed the baby Jesus. Do you want baby Jesus to go unfed? You heartless bastards!



PS. Are there more photos inside? Or is she only on the cover?
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#11 Dec 15 2008 at 7:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
ElneClare wrote:
Now if tey really wanted to make it look like a Renaissance painting of the Madonna holding a nude baby Jesus, it would be NSFW Smiley: glare

Throwing a little something in there to grab the Catholic Priest audience, clever.
#12 Dec 15 2008 at 8:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Pensive wrote:
It seems strange that catholics would come into contact with a playboy magazine.
Setting aside the obvious "People who actually buy Playboy", do you think Catholics don't go to newstands or liquor stores or book stores or whereever else Playboy is sold and they might see the cover?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#13 Dec 15 2008 at 8:16 PM Rating: Good
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
TirithRR wrote:
There is nothing "sexual" about it. Mary is obviously just getting ready to breast feed the baby Jesus. Do you want baby Jesus to go unfed? You heartless bastards!



PS. Are there more photos inside? Or is she only on the cover?


Found an ebook copy of that playboy, there are more pictures of her dressed like that inside.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#14 Dec 15 2008 at 8:20 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Shaowstrike wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
There is nothing "sexual" about it. Mary is obviously just getting ready to breast feed the baby Jesus. Do you want baby Jesus to go unfed? You heartless bastards!



PS. Are there more photos inside? Or is she only on the cover?


Found an ebook copy of that playboy, there are more pictures of her dressed like that inside.


Ya, I found the pictures too, looks like there are about 20 of them inside. The model's name is Maria Florencia Onori. So when they said "Adoramos, Maria!" They could easily have been saying they love the model, not a phrase about Mary. Smiley: wink
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#15 Dec 15 2008 at 8:59 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
do you think Catholics don't go to newstands or liquor stores or book stores or whereever else Playboy is sold and they might see the cover?


Sure I guess.

I get most of my information through the internet though, since I don't go to newstands or liquor stores. Projection and all that.
#16 Dec 15 2008 at 9:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Setting aside the obvious "People who actually buy Playboy", do you think Catholics don't go to newstands or liquor stores or book stores or whereever else Playboy is sold and they might see the cover?


And they feel really bad about buying it, too.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#17 Dec 16 2008 at 12:27 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Pensive wrote:
It seems strange that catholics would come into contact with a playboy magazine.
Setting aside the obvious "People who actually buy Playboy", do you think Catholics don't go to newstands or liquor stores or book stores or whereever else Playboy is sold and they might see the cover?


Should tell them about 4chan.
#18 Dec 16 2008 at 12:08 PM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
And they feel really bad about it
Classic Catholicism.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#19 Dec 16 2008 at 1:42 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
bsphil wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
And they feel really bad about it
Classic Catholicism.


As long as you are sorry, it's ok?
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#20 Dec 16 2008 at 2:16 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
I don't care but it seems like pretty bad business sense to put out a cover potentially viewed as denigrating someone who is arguably the most important figure in Hispanic Catholicism.


Bad business sense? Are you sure?

I'd lay good money on it being the highest selling issue of the year.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#21 Dec 16 2008 at 3:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
As long as you are sorry, it's ok?


It's all about the guilt.

& Confession.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#22 Dec 16 2008 at 7:20 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
She's pretty hot.
#23 Dec 16 2008 at 7:25 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
She's pretty hot.


She's not really a virgin you know.....
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#24 Dec 17 2008 at 2:55 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,909 posts
paulsol wrote:
Quote:
She's pretty hot.


She's not really a virgin you know.....


You're always confusing me with these odd non sequiturs.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 248 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (248)